An indirect sequential determination of phosphorus and arsenic in high-purity tungsten and its compounds by atomic-absorption spectrophotometry

1981 ◽  
Vol 76 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piroska Tekula-Buxbaum
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Absorption ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Sequential Determination ◽  
Absorption Spectrophotometry

Determination of metals of low concentration in high purity copper by atomic absorption spectrophotometry

1975 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katalin Z. Balla ◽  
Etelka G. Hars�nyi ◽  
L�szl� P�los ◽  
Ern� Pungor
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Absorption ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Low Concentration ◽  
Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Purity Copper

Determination of Minor Nutrients in Fertilizers by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry: Second Collaborative Study

1965 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1100-1103
Author(s):  
C H Mcbride
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Absorption ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Absorption Method ◽  
Atomic Absorption Method ◽  
Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Minor Nutrients

Abstract The atomic absorption method studied last year was re-examined and extended to include calcium and sodium. The procedures were submitted to 16 collaborators for determination of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Na, and Zn. Results for Ca and Na were discouraging; further study is recommended.

Comparison of Methods for Determining Biuret in Urea

1979 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Luis F Corominas ◽  
Victor M Boy ◽  
Manuel Guijosa
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Absorption ◽  
Spectrophotometric Determination ◽  
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
International Organization ◽  
Comparison Of Methods ◽  
Definite Advantage ◽  
Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
Alternative Procedures ◽  
Aoac Method

Abstract The official first action AOAC method for the spectrophotometric determination of biuret in urea, 2.072—2.074, was compared with official first action AOAC method 2.C01-2.C03 (atomic absorption spectrophotometry), 2 simplified versions of 2.072-2.074, and modified versions of 2 alternative procedures of the International Organization for Standardization. Three synthetic urea samples (0.3, 1.4, and 3.0% biuret) and 1 commercial urea sample (1.0% biuret) were analyzed. The methods proved to be equivalent and none showed a definite advantage over 2.072-2.074. The purification of biuret and the interference by ammonia are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document