Comparison of the interaction of the anti-viral chemotherapeutic agents amantadine and tromantadine with model phospholipid membranes

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Cheetham ◽  
Richard M. Epand
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Cyclosporin A ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Hexagonal Phase ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Hydrophilic Group

Amantadine and tromantadine are agents used against influenza and herpes infections, respectively. Tromantadine raises the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature of synthetic phosphatidylethanolamines and is less disruptive to phospholipid packing. Tromantadine acts similar to cyclosporin A, previously demonstrated to inhibit viral-induced cell-cell fusion. We suggest the balance between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic group sizes would allow tromantadine to prevent membrane fusion more than amantadine and thus inhibit infection by viruses such as Herpes, which fuse with the plasma membrane. Study of agents which stabilize the bilayer phase of membranes may lead to efficacious inhibitors of viral infections requiring cell fusion events.

Virus replication inhibitory peptide inhibits the conversion of phospholipid bilayers to the hexagonal phase

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 647-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Epand
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Phase Transition Temperature ◽  
Virus Replication ◽  
Hexagonal Phase ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Viral Glycoprotein ◽  
Inhibitory Peptide

Virus replication inhibitory peptide (carbobenzoxy-D-Phe-L-PheGly) was shown to be a potent specific inhibitor of the replication of paramyxovirus and myxovirus (Richardson, Scheid and Choppin (1980), Virology105, 205–222). This peptide inhibits the membrane fusing activity of a viral glycoprotein. Many agents which promote the formation of the hexagonal phase in membranes also accelerate membrane fusion. At a mole fraction of 0.1, viral replication inhibitory peptide can raise the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature of dielaidoylphosphatidylethanolamine by almost 10°. Two related peptides, carbobenzoxy-L-PheGly and carbobenzoxy-L-GlyPhe, are less potent in raising the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature, with the latter peptide being the least effective of the three. This order of potency is the same as the order of potency in inhibiting viral replication. Substances which inhibit hexagonal phase formation of pure lipids may also inhibit membrane fusion.

Bilayer stabilizing peptides and the inhibition of viral infection: antimeasles activity of carbobenzoxy-Ser-Leu-amide

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 745-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Epand ◽  
Thomas J. Lobl ◽  
H. E. Renis
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Phase Transition Temperature ◽  
Measles Virus ◽  
Cytopathic Effect ◽  
Hexagonal Phase ◽  
Vero Cells ◽  
Time Parameter ◽  
Scanning Calorimetry ◽  
Hplc Retention Time

A number of carbobenzoxy-dipeptide-amides raise the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature of dielaidoylphosphatidylethanolamine (stabilizes the bilayer). The potency of the peptides in stabilizing the bilayer phase is Z-Tyr-Leu-NH2>Z-Gly-Phe-NH2>Z-Ser-Leu-NH2>Z-Gly-Leu-NH2>Z-Gly-Gly-NH2. A linear correlation was found between the respective HPLC retention time parameter k′ for the peptide and the slope of the bilayer stabilization curve determined with model membranes by differential scanning calorimetry. One dipeptide, Z-Ser-Leu-NH2, reduces measles virus cytopathic effect (CPE) in Vero cells. The mechanism by which this peptide reduces the CPE is not known, although some peptides which raise the bilayer to hexagonal phase transition temperature of phospholipids inhibit membrane fusion.

scholarly journals FUS1Regulates the Opening and Expansion of Fusion Pores between Mating Yeast

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2439-2450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Nolan ◽  
Ann E. Cowan ◽  
Dennis E. Koppel ◽  
Hui Jin ◽  
Eric Grote
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Fusion Pore ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Fluorescent Markers ◽  
Fold Reduction ◽  
Fusion Pores

Mating yeast cells provide a genetically accessible system for the study of cell fusion. The dynamics of fusion pores between yeast cells were analyzed by following the exchange of fluorescent markers between fusion partners. Upon plasma membrane fusion, cytoplasmic GFP and DsRed diffuse between cells at rates proportional to the size of the fusion pore. GFP permeance measurements reveal that a typical fusion pore opens with a burst and then gradually expands. In some mating pairs, a sudden increase in GFP permeance was found, consistent with the opening of a second pore. In contrast, other fusion pores closed after permitting a limited amount of cytoplasmic exchange. Deletion of FUS1 from both mating partners caused a >10-fold reduction in the initial permeance and expansion rate of the fusion pore. Although fus1 mating pairs also have a defect in degrading the cell wall that separates mating partners before plasma membrane fusion, other cell fusion mutants with cell wall remodeling defects had more modest effects on fusion pore permeance. Karyogamy is delayed by >1 h in fus1 mating pairs, possibly as a consequence of retarded fusion pore expansion.

scholarly journals Ultrastructural plasma membrane asymmetries in tension and curvature promote yeast cell fusion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Muriel ◽  
Laetitia Michon ◽  
Wanda Kukulski ◽  
Sophie G Martin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Sexual Reproduction ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Turgor Pressure ◽  
Wall Material ◽  
M Cells ◽  
P Cells ◽  
Cell Cell

Cell-cell fusion is central to the process of fertilization for sexual reproduction. This necessitates the remodeling of peri-cellular matrix or cell wall material and the merging of plasma membranes. In walled fission yeast S. pombe, the fusion of P and M cells during sexual reproduction relies on the fusion focus, an actin structure that concentrates glucanase-containing secretory vesicles for local cell wall digestion necessary for membrane fusion. Here, we present a correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) quantitative study of a large dataset of 3D tomograms of the fusion site, which revealed the ultrastructure of the fusion focus as an actin-containing, vesicle-dense structure excluding other organelles. Unexpectedly, the data revealed asymmetries between the two gametes: M-cells exhibit a taut and convex plasma membrane that progressively protrudes into P-cells, which exhibit a more slack, wavy plasma membrane. These asymmetries are relaxed upon plasma membrane fusion, with observations of ramified pores that may result from multiple initiations or inhomogeneous expansion. We show that P-cells have a higher exo- to endocytosis ratio than M-cells, and that local reduction in exocytosis abrogates membrane waviness and compromises cell fusion significantly more in P- than M-cells. Reciprocally, reduction of turgor pressure specifically in M-cells prevents their protrusions into P-cells and delays cell fusion. Thus, asymmetric membrane conformations, which result from differential turgor pressure and exocytosis/endocytosis ratios between mating types, favor cell-cell fusion.

scholarly journals Prm1p, a Pheromone-Regulated Multispanning Membrane Protein, Facilitates Plasma Membrane Fusion during Yeast Mating

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell G. Heiman ◽  
Peter Walter
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Plasma Membranes ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Cell Contact ◽  
Yeast Mating

Cell fusion occurs throughout development, from fertilization to organogenesis. The molecular mechanisms driving plasma membrane fusion in these processes remain unknown. While yeast mating offers an excellent model system in which to study cell fusion, all genes previously shown to regulate the process act at or before cell wall breakdown; i.e., well before the two plasma membranes have come in contact. Using a new strategy in which genomic data is used to predict which genes may possess a given function, we identified PRM1, a gene that is selectively expressed during mating and that encodes a multispanning transmembrane protein. Prm1p localizes to sites of cell–cell contact where fusion occurs. In matings between Δprm1 mutants, a large fraction of cells initiate zygote formation and degrade the cell wall separating mating partners but then fail to fuse. Electron microscopic analysis reveals that the two plasma membranes in these mating pairs are tightly apposed, remaining separated only by a uniform gap of ∼8 nm. Thus, the phenotype of Δprm1 mutants defines a new step in the mating reaction in which membranes are juxtaposed, possibly through a defined adherence junction, yet remain unfused. This phenotype suggests a role for Prm1p in plasma membrane fusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document