Farm-level and district efforts to improve water management during drought

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Wichelns ◽  
David Cone
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Robert ◽  
Alban Thomas ◽  
Muddu Sekhar ◽  
Hélène Raynal ◽  
Éric Casellas ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-173
Author(s):  
Florent Demelezi ◽  
◽  
Bernadett Galya ◽  
Janos Tamas ◽  
Imri Demelezi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Reddy Kakumanu ◽  
Yella Reddy Kaluvai ◽  
Udaya Sekhar Nagothu ◽  
Narayan Reddy Lati ◽  
Gurava Reddy Kotapati ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2611
Author(s):  
Bahram Saeidian ◽  
Mohammad Saadi Mesgari ◽  
Biswajeet Pradhan ◽  
Abdullah M. Alamri

The present water crisis necessitates a frugal water management strategy. Deficit irrigation can be regarded as an efficient strategy for agricultural water management. Optimal allocation of water to agricultural farms is a computationally complex problem because of many factors, including limitations and constraints related to irrigation, numerous allocation states, and non-linearity and complexity of the objective function. Meta-heuristic algorithms are typically used to solve complex problems. The main objective of this study is to represent water allocation at farm level using temporal cultivation data as an optimisation problem, solve this problem using various meta-heuristic algorithms, and compare the results. The objective of the optimisation is to maximise the total income of all considered lands. The criteria of objective function value, convergence trend, robustness, runtime, and complexity of use and modelling are used to compare the algorithms. Finally, the algorithms are ranked using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The income resulting from the allocation of water by the imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) was 1.006, 1.084, and 1.098 times that of particle swarm optimisation (PSO), bees algorithm (BA), and genetic algorithm (GA), respectively. The ICA and PSO were superior to the other algorithms in most evaluations. According to the results of TOPSIS, the algorithms, by order of priority, are ICA PSO, BA, and GA. In addition, the experience showed that using meta-heuristic algorithms, such as ICA, results in higher income (4.747 times) and improved management of water deficit than the commonly used area-based water allocation method.


2009 ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Balendonck ◽  
C. Stanghellini ◽  
J. Hemming ◽  
F.L.K. Kempkes ◽  
B.A.J. Van Tuijl
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document