One-dimensional model of the motion of a concentrated disperse mixture in an annular duct

1986 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-525
Author(s):  
D. V. Bakonin ◽  
V. A. Drach ◽  
E. M. Dyn'kin
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Model ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Disperse Mixture ◽  
Annular Duct

Modelling Techniques in Applied Glaciology: Numerical Modelling of Avalanches

1983 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
G. Brugnot
Keyword(s):  
Finite Difference Method ◽  
Transverse Velocity ◽  
Longitudinal Velocity ◽  
Momentum Conservation ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Modelling Techniques ◽  
Reference Grid ◽  
The One ◽  
Near Future

We consider the paper by Brugnot and Pochat (1981), which describes a one-dimensional model applied to a snow avalanche. The main advance made here is the introduction of the second dimension in the runout zone. Indeed, in the channelled course, we still use the one-dimensional model, but, when the avalanche spreads before stopping, we apply a (x, y) grid on the ground and six equations have to be solved: (1) for the avalanche body, one equation for continuity and two equations for momentum conservation, and (2) at the front, one equation for continuity and two equations for momentum conservation. We suppose the front to be a mobile jump, with longitudinal velocity varying more rapidly than transverse velocity.We solve these equations by a finite difference method. This involves many topological problems, due to the actual position of the front, which is defined by its intersection with the reference grid (SI, YJ). In the near future our two directions of research will be testing the code on actual avalanches and improving it by trying to make it cheaper without impairing its accuracy.

Tilting transitions in a one-dimensional model lipid monolayer

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 2889-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Gianotti ◽  
M J Grimson ◽  
M Silbert
Keyword(s):  
Lipid Monolayer ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
One Dimensional

A time-dependent model for high-pressure discharges in narrow ablative capillaries

1993 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Zoler ◽  
S. Cuperman ◽  
J. Ashkenazy ◽  
M. Caner ◽  
Z. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Equation Of State ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Plasma Sources ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Space And Time ◽  
Dependent Model ◽  
Energy Equations ◽  
Time Dependent Model

A time-dependent quasi-one-dimensional model is developed for studying high- pressure discharges in ablative capillaries used, for example, as plasma sources in electrothermal launchers. The main features of the model are (i) consideration of ablation effects in each of the continuity, momentum and energy equations; (ii) use of a non-ideal equation of state; and (iii) consideration of space- and time-dependent ionization.

Quasi-One-Dimensional Model of Hydrogen-Fueled Scramjet Combustors

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1220-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian H. Birzer ◽  
Con J. Doolan
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Model ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Scramjet Combustors

Mine Impact Burial Prediction From One to Three Dimensions

2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Chu
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Time History ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Vertical Position ◽  
Burial Depth ◽  
Prediction Errors ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Models

The Navy’s mine impact burial prediction model creates a time history of a cylindrical or a noncylindrical mine as it falls through air, water, and sediment. The output of the model is the predicted mine trajectory in air and water columns, burial depth/orientation in sediment, as well as height, area, and volume protruding. Model inputs consist of parameters of environment, mine characteristics, and initial release. This paper reviews near three decades’ effort on model development from one to three dimensions: (1) one-dimensional models predict the vertical position of the mine’s center of mass (COM) with the assumption of constant falling angle, (2) two-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,z) plane and the rotation around the y-axis, and (3) three-dimensional models predict the COM position in the (x,y,z) space and the rotation around the x-, y-, and z-axes. These models are verified using the data collected from mine impact burial experiments. The one-dimensional model only solves one momentum equation (in the z-direction). It cannot predict the mine trajectory and burial depth well. The two-dimensional model restricts the mine motion in the (x,z) plane (which requires motionless for the environmental fluids) and uses incorrect drag coefficients and inaccurate sediment dynamics. The prediction errors are large in the mine trajectory and burial depth prediction (six to ten times larger than the observed depth in sand bottom of the Monterey Bay). The three-dimensional model predicts the trajectory and burial depth relatively well for cylindrical, near-cylindrical mines, and operational mines such as Manta and Rockan mines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document