Aerodynamic characteristics of star-shaped bodies at Mach numbers M = 3?5

1982 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Vedernikov ◽  
A. L. Gonor ◽  
M. A. Zubin ◽  
N. A. Ostapenko
Keyword(s):  
Aerodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Mach Numbers

Influencing Factors Analysis of the Shock-Induced Separation for Supercritical Airfoil

2013 ◽  
Vol 444-445 ◽  
pp. 221-226
Author(s):  
Xin Xu ◽  
Da Wei Liu ◽  
De Hua Chen ◽  
Yuan Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Aerodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Navier Stokes Equations ◽  
Supercritical Airfoil ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Mach Numbers

The shock-induced separation easily occurred on the upper surface of supercritical airfoil at transonic speeds, which would change the aerodynamic characteristics. The problem of the shock-induced separation was not solved completely for the complicated phenomena and flow mechanism. In this paper, the influencing factors of shock-induced separation for supercritical airfoil CH was analyzed at transonic speeds. The Navier-Stokes equations were solved, in order to investigate influence of different attack angles, Mach numbers and Reynolds numbers. The computation attack angles of CH airfoil varied from 0oto 7o, Reynolds numbers varied from 5×106to 50×106per airfoil chord while Mach number varied from 0.74 to 0.82. It was shown that the shock-induced separation was affected by attack angles, Mach numbers and Reynolds numbers, but the influence tendency and areas were quite different. The shock wave location and intensity were affected by the three factors, and the boundary layer thickness was mainly affected by Reynolds number, while the separation structure was mainly determined by the attack angle and Mach number.

Aerodynamic analysis and design of Busemann biplane: towards efficient supersonic flight

2011 ◽  
Vol 226 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Maruyama ◽  
K Kusunose ◽  
K Matsushima ◽  
K Nakahashi
Keyword(s):  
Mach Number ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Aerodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Aerodynamic Performance ◽  
The Body ◽  
Analysis And Design ◽  
Expansion Waves ◽  
Mach Numbers ◽  
Inverse Design Method

Aiming to realize a low-drag supersonic transport, Busemann biplane concept was adopted in this study. Two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) biplanes were analysed and designed to improve their aerodynamic performance using computational fluid dynamics. It was confirmed that 3D biplane wings have better aerodynamic-performance areas than 2D biplane airfoils. A winglet is also useful for improvement of their aerodynamic performance. Aerodynamic characteristics of these biplanes at their off-design conditions were also analysed. In 3D wings, a flow choking and its attendant hysteresis as starting problems, which arise when the biplanes accelerate from low Mach numbers, disappear at lower Mach numbers than those in 2D airfoils. It was confirmed that hinged slats and flaps are effective to settle these issues. Finally, interference effects of a body with the biplanes were investigated. When the biplane wings are affected by the expansion waves from the body, their aerodynamic performance at the design Mach number and the starting Mach number are better and lower than those of their isolated wings, respectively. A 3D biplane wing obtained by an inverse-design method was applied to the body. The wing of this wing–body configuration achieves higher aerodynamic performance than the 2D flat-plate airfoil at sufficient lift conditions, which is the almost identical performance of 2D biplane airfoils.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document