Procedural justice and parents' satisfaction in a field study of child custody dispute resolution.

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Kitzmann ◽  
Robert E. Emery
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Child Custody

scholarly journals TEISĖJO ELGESIO IR SPRENDIMO PROGNOZĖS SĄVEIKA VERTINANT PROCEDŪRINĮ TEISINGU

Psichologija ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 87-101
Author(s):  
Alfredas Laurinavičius
Keyword(s):  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Status Recognition ◽  
Justice Judgments ◽  
Moderate Relationship

Teisingumo klausimas yra svarbus teisminio ginčo nagrinėjimo dalyviams. Suvoktas sprendimo ir procedūrinis teisingumas turi įtakos sprendimo ir jį priimančio asmens vertinimams. Atliktame faktoriniame 3 × 2 × 2 eksperimente buvo tiriama subjektyvios teisėjo sprendimo palankumo prognozės įtaka teisingumo vertinimams. Esant skirtingai teisėjo sprendimo prognozei, teisėjo elgesio ypatumai turi skirtingą įtaką procedūrinio teisingumo ir pasitikėjimo teismais vertinimams. Atliktas eksperimentas parodė, kad teisėjo elgesio ir procedūrinio teisingumo reikalavimų atitikimas yra ypač svarbus vertinant teisėjo elgesį tais atvejais, kai ginčo dalyvis prognozuoja nepalankų sau sprendimą arba neturi aiškios teisėjo sprendimo prognozės. Esant nepalankiai teisėjo sprendimo prognozei, teisėjo elgesio ir procedūrinio teisingumo reikalavimų atitikimas ypač stipriai veikia asmens pasitikėjimą teismais.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: teisingumo psichologija, procedūrinis teisingumas, ginčo sprendimas. THE INTERACTION OF JUDGE’S BEHAVIOR AND JUDGE’S DECISION PROGNOSIS IN THE PROCEDURAL JUSTICE JUDGMENTSAlfredas Laurinavičius SummaryPsychological research shows a big importance of procedural justice in dispute resolution. Perception of procedural justice affects evaluations of the performance of legal institutions and authorities, evaluations of legal decisions and outcomes, satisfaction with encounters with the legal system, support for legal institutions and compliance with law. According to K. van den Bos and E. A. Lind people are more affected by variation in fairness when they feel uncertain. Participants’ expectations about judge’s possible decision can moderate relationship between procedure and subjective evaluation of procedural justice. 3 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted: 3 (expectation of the possible decision: certainly positive, certainly negative, uncertain)× 2 (decision: positive vs. negative) × 2 (procedure: fair vs. unfair). The experiment was conduced in 2 Vilnius universities, participation was voluntary, participants were not paid. Data of 330 students (men and women) were analyzed. There were between 22 and 36 participants per cell. A scenario method was applied in the experiment. Participants were given a description of legal dispute of non material harm compensation. Participants were asked to imagine themselves as being defendant and evaluated a possibility of positive and negative decision. Participants were shown one of two videotapes with excerpts from litigation session. After watching the excerpt (fair treatment or unfair treatment) they received judge’s final decision (favorable or unfavorab le) and completed the questionnaire. Dependents variables in this experiment were participants’ evaluations of distributive justice, procedural justice, perceived voice, neutrality, trust in benevolence, status recognition and support for courts.A 2 × 2 × 3 ANOVA revealed significant interactions between Expectation and Procedure on perceived voice F (2,318) = 4.513, p < .05, η² = .028, neutrality F (2,318) = 3.413, p < .05, η² = .021 and support for courts F (2,318) = 3.084, p < .05, η² = .019. No interactions were found for distributive justice, procedural justice, trust in benevolence, status recognition. A significant effect of Expectation was found on distributive justice judgments F (2,317) = 5.02, p < .05, η² = .031. Those expected negative decision rated distributive justice more positively.The presented research shows that expectation of judge’s decision can moderate some procedural justice judgments and support for courts judgments. Variation of procedure had biggest effect on evaluation of perceived voice, neutrality and support for courts in condition when participant was expecting negative decision. It seems that expectation of negative decision makes people more sensitive to procedural issues. Being certain about positive decision decreases a role of procedure on those ratings.Keywords: Psychology of Justice, Procedural justice, Dispute resolution.

scholarly journals Mexico-U. S. Cross-Border Family Mediation: Legal Issues in Mexico

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (18) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Nuria González Martín
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Mexico City ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Family Mediation ◽  
Child Abduction ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Binary Approach ◽  
International Child ◽  
The Usa

The approach taken by society toward dispute resolution in child custody cases has historically been seen as litigation versus mediation. Given the current volume of cross-border family-related disputes, this binary approach no longer makes sense. In this note, I provide a brief introduction to mediation in Mexico, especially Mexico City. I also analyze other ideas regarding International Child Abduction by one of the Parents and International Family Mediation between Mexico and the USA.

Employee Perceptions of the Fairness of Work Group Incentive Pay Plans

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Dulebohn ◽  
Joseph J. Martocchio
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Commitment ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Work Group ◽  
Fortune 500 ◽  
Employee Perceptions ◽  
Incentive Pay ◽  
Production Facility ◽  
Job Classification ◽  
Fairness Judgments

A field study investigated 368 employees’ perceptions of the fair-ness of work group incentive pay plans. In particular, we studied therelationships between six antecedent variables (understanding of thepay plan, satisfaction with base pay, organizational commitment, beliefsin the pay plan eflectiveness, plan payout amount, and group identijication) and outcome variables, including fairness judgments of both theprocesses associated with the pay plan as well as the earned payoutamounts. The setting for this study was a major nonunion production facility of a Fortune 500 company that is involved in chemical produc-tion. The findings indicate that understanding of the pay plan, belief inthe pay plan effectiveness, and organizational commitment were relatedto perceptions of procedural justice. Moreover, pay satisfaction, under-standing, belief in the pay plan effectiveness, and organizational commitment were associated with perceptions of distributive justice.Further, we found significant effects of two control variables— job classification on perceptions of procedural justice, and organization altenure on both perceptions of procedural and distributive justice.

KENDALA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH MELALUI PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA MALANG

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Zulhefni
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Field Study ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Causative Factor ◽  
District Court ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Economic Problems ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

<p>Authority to prosecute sharia economy is an Islamic Religious Court’s absolute authority. However, there are still a lot of Sharia economic problems presented to the District Court. This fact raises the question, what causes an Sharia economic dispute still filed in the District Court. This research is a field research or field study with a juridical sociology approach. As for method of analysis, the research used descriptive qualitative analysis method. Causative factor that make Sharia economic problems still exist in an environment of Public Justice is not caused by one party but the entire parties concerned in transactions of Islamic economy. In addition, the authorities in resolving the disputes also be the cause. There are at least 4 causes that can be categorized which is associated with the contract clause in terms of dispute resolution, the customer, the competence of religious court judges and the attitude of the District Court.</p><p><br />Kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara ekonomi syariah merupakan kewenangan absolut yang dimiliki Pengadilan Agama. Namun pada kenyataanya masih banyak perkara ekonomi syariah yang diajukan oleh pelaku ekonomi syariah ke Pengadilan Negeri. Hal ini menimbulkan tanda tanya, faktor apakah yang menyebabkan sengketa ekonomi syariah sampai saat ini masih diajukan di Pengadilan Negeri. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian field research atau studi lapangan dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Adapun metode analisis data yang menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah faktor penyebab masih adanya perkara ekonomi syariah di lingkungan Peradilan Umum tidaklah disebabkan oleh satu pihak saja, melainkan seluruh pihak yang terkait dalam transaksi ekonomi syariah tersebut. Selain itu, pihak yang berwenang dalam menyelesaikan sengketa juga ikut menjadi penyebab. Setidaknya ada 4 penyebab yang dapat penulis kategorikan dalam penelitian yaitu sebab yang terkait dengan klausula akad dalam hal penyelesaian sengketa, nasabah, kompetensi hakim Pengadilan Agama dan sikap dari Pengadilan Negeri itu sendiri.</p>

Confrontations and Compromise: Dispute Resolution at a Worker Cooperative Coal Mine

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 555-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Coal Mine ◽  
Organizational Theory ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Hierarchical Organization ◽  
Law And Society ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Worker Cooperative

This paper compares dispute-resolution behavior at a large coal mine in South Wales at two times: when the mine was run as a conventional, hierarchical organization by British Coal and, several years later, when it was bought out by the employees and converted into a worker cooperative. Synthesizing themes from law and society, organizational theory, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) research, I demonstrate how shared ownership, flattened hierarchy, and cooperative ideology impact on disputing behavior. By changing from a hierarchical organization to a worker cooperative, the coal mine increased is level of procedural justice and transformed its dispute-resolution behavior to rely much more on informal resolution. Using qualitative methods, this research draws on 42 in-depth open interviews with miners and managers.

Child custody mediation and litigation: Custody, contact, and coparenting 12 years after initial dispute resolution.

2001 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Emery ◽  
Lisa Laumann-Billings ◽  
Mary C. Waldron ◽  
David A. Sbarra ◽  
Peter Dillon
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Custody Mediation

scholarly journals Nalar Integrasi Fikih dan Psikologi Keluarga dalam Pandangan Hakim Agama Jawa Timur Tentang Hak Asuh Anak Pasangan Murtad

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-98
Author(s):  
M. Ghufron ◽  
Moh. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Field Study ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Family Psychology ◽  
The Family ◽  
Normative Basis

One of the causes of divorce which was decided by a Religious Court judge was because of the apostasy of one of the spouses. Divorce due to apostasy leaves problems in parenting. To whom the child custody will be given must be considered by the judge. This research is empirical research (field study) with fiqh and family psychology approach to get an understanding of the basic considerations of judges in establishing child custody in the case of an apostate partner. Through interviews and documentation, the study found, that the consideration of judges based on three things: first, normative basis, which is based on the consideration of Constitution No. 1 of 1974, Compilation of Islamic Law, Constitution No. 7 of 1989 Jo. Constitution Number 30 of 2006 concerning Childcare, and Number 23 of 2002, Supreme Court jurisprudence Number 210 / K / AG / 1990. Second, fiqh basis, which refers to the requirements of the Hadhanah which are in line with fiqh and the provisions of the Hadhanah based on Syafii's Madzab. Third, the psychological basis, which considers all psychological problems related to children. By using this integrative analysis the judge considers that the requirements for Muslims to care for children are in line with psychological values, that the family must provide Islamic education to shape the child's mental spirit.

A therapeutic mediation model for child custody dispute resolution

1984 ◽  
Vol 1984 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane A. Waldron ◽  
Colleen P. Roth ◽  
Patricia H. Fair ◽  
Eberhard M. Mann ◽  
John F. McDermott
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Child Custody ◽  
Mediation Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document