Uncertainty of a measured result and confidence error of measurements

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 872-878
Author(s):  
M. N. Selivanov
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Error

scholarly journals COUNTERPART CANDIDATES TO THE UNIDENTIFIED FERMI SOURCE 0FGL J1848.6-0138

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 825-830
Author(s):  
P. L. LUQUE-ESCAMILLA ◽  
E. SÁNCHEZ AYASO ◽  
J. MARTÍ ◽  
A. J. MUÑOZ-ARJONILLA ◽  
J. R. SÁNCHEZ SUTIL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Globular Cluster ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Confidence Error ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Low X

Here we report the finding of a few counterpart candidates inside the 95% confidence error box of the Fermi LAT unidentified gamma-ray source 0FGL J1848.6-0138. Among them, the globular cluster GLIMPSE-C01 is specially remarkable. It offers a conceivable physical scenario for gamma-ray production and if confirmed to be counterpart it would be the second globular cluster (after 47 Tuc) associated to a Fermi source. The Fermi-observed spectrum is compared with theoretical predictions in the literature and the association is found to be plausible but not yet certain because of its low X–ray to gamma-ray luminosity ratio.

scholarly journals Neural Correlates of People's Hypercorrection of Their False Beliefs

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1571-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Metcalfe ◽  
Brady Butterfield ◽  
Christian Habeck ◽  
Yaakov Stern
Keyword(s):  
General Information ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
High Confidence ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Confidence Error ◽  
True Answer ◽  
The Right ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Information Errors ◽  
Error Condition

Despite the intuition that strongly held beliefs are particularly difficult to change, the data on error correction indicate that general information errors that people commit with a high degree of belief are especially easy to correct. This finding is called the hypercorrection effect. The hypothesis was tested that the reason for hypercorrection stems from enhanced attention and encoding that results from a metacognitive mismatch between the person's confidence in their responses and the true answer. This experiment, which is the first to use imaging to investigate the hypercorrection effect, provided support for this hypothesis, showing that both metacognitive mismatch conditions—that in which high confidence accompanies a wrong answer and that in which low confidence accompanies a correct answer—revealed anterior cingulate and medial frontal gyrus activations. Only in the high confidence error condition, however, was an error that conflicted with the true answer mentally present. And only the high confidence error condition yielded activations in the right TPJ and the right dorsolateral pFC. These activations suggested that, during the correction process after error commission, people (1) were entertaining both the false belief as well as the true belief (as in theory of mind tasks, which also manifest the right TPJ activation) and (2) may have been suppressing the unwanted, incorrect information that they had, themselves, produced (as in think/no-think tasks, which also manifest dorsolateral pFC activation). These error-specific processes as well as enhanced attention because of metacognitive mismatch appear to be implicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document