Effects of grading practices and time of rating on student ratings of faculty performance and student learning

1991 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Nimmer ◽  
Eugene F. Stone
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Student Ratings ◽  
Grading Practices ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

Student Ratings of Faculty

AAUP Bulletin ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbert J. Mckeachie
Keyword(s):  
Student Ratings ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

Analysis Of Online Student Ratings Of University Faculty

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Otto ◽  
Douglas Sanford ◽  
William Wagner
Keyword(s):  
World Wide Web ◽  
Student Perceptions ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Faculty Evaluation ◽  
Student Ratings ◽  
Online Faculty ◽  
Online Student ◽  
Evaluation Data ◽  
The World ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

This article explores and analyzes a new, exciting, and quite different source of faculty evaluation data that has recently become available on the world wide web; online faculty evaluation/ratings.  The authors analyze the relationships between different online student rating measures of faculty performance.  They investigate how student ratings of faculty easiness, clarity, and helpfulness are interrelated.  The results of the analysis provides insights into student perceptions of faculty and suggest implications for the practice of teaching.

Postlecture and postcourse student ratings of faculty in multi‐instructor courses

1989 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Scott ◽  
Gerald M. Gillmore ◽  
Douglas M. Brock ◽  
D. Daniel Hunt ◽  
Laurie M. Greig
Keyword(s):  
Student Ratings ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

Key Performance Indicator Dashboards

2021 ◽  
pp. 274-281
Author(s):  
Kelly Palese ◽  
Monte McKay
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Faculty Development ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Key Performance Indicator ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Online Classroom ◽  
Teaching Online ◽  
Faculty Teaching

Growing enrollments in online learning have dramatically increased the number of remote, adjunct faculty teaching online. This is a challenge for universities to create scalable strategies to develop, evaluate, and support faculty in the online classroom. While robust qualitative and quantitative faculty performance metrics exist, faculty analytic data is typically difficult to retrieve and even more difficult to efficiently analyze. This chapter overviews the value of key performance indicator dashboards (KPI) that can help automate the collection and use of faculty analytic data to enhance faculty development and, ultimately, foster positive student learning experiences.

Meanings Underlying Student Ratings of Faculty

1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn R. Benz ◽  
Stephen J. Blatt
Keyword(s):  
Student Ratings ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

Correspondence: "Student Ratings of Faculty"

AAUP Bulletin ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Nochimson ◽  
Edgar F. Borgatta ◽  
Paul S. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Student Ratings ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty

Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise

Academe ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilbert J. McKeachie
Keyword(s):  
Student Ratings ◽  
Student Ratings Of Faculty
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document