Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the male genital system inPorocephalus crotali andP. stilesi (Pentastomida: Porocephalida)

1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 610-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Storch ◽  
Wolfgang B�ckeler ◽  
John Riley
Keyword(s):  
Genital System ◽  
Microscopic Anatomy ◽  
Male Genital System ◽  
Anatomy And Ultrastructure ◽  
Male Genital

Morphologic differences between abdominal and inguinal testes in stallions

1987 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 820-821
Author(s):  
F. Al-Bagdadi ◽  
D. Hoyt ◽  
P. Karns ◽  
G. Martin ◽  
M. Memon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoma Cells ◽  
Genital System ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Male Genital System ◽  
Morphological Differences ◽  
Hormone Imbalance ◽  
Made In ◽  
Male Genital

The most frequently occuring abnormality of the male genital system in mammals is the failure of one or both testes to descend into the scrotum. The reasons for abdominal or inguinal retention of testes could be anatomic malformation, faulty development or hormone imbalance.Cryptorchidism has been associated with either greatly reduced or absent spermatogenesis (Kaueakami et al, 1984), and being a source of neoplasia. According to Stick (1980), germinal carcinoma cells have been believed to be the cause of teratomas in equine cryptorchid testicles. Neoplasia has been reported in descended testes of unilateral cryptorchid patients (Martin et al, 1981).No distinction has been made in relating the problem of cryptorchid testes to inguinal or abdominal retention. The purpose of this study is to record the morphological differences between inguinal and abdominal cryptorchid testes as an aid in diagnosis and prognosis.

scholarly journals Tumors of the Male Genital System

1974 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 849-849
Author(s):  
N. F. C. Gowing
Keyword(s):  
Genital System ◽  
Male Genital System ◽  
Male Genital

Male Genital System

1987 ◽  
pp. 194-198
Author(s):  
Nancy K. Hall ◽  
Daniel L. Feeback
Keyword(s):  
Genital System ◽  
Male Genital System ◽  
Male Genital

scholarly journals Circumcision requirement in children with phimosis: immediately or elective?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-428
Author(s):  
Serpil Sancar ◽  
Elif Altınay Kırlı
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Genital System ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
Pathological Findings ◽  
Undescended Testicle ◽  
Male Genital System ◽  
One Year ◽  
Referring Physicians ◽  
Male Genital

Objective: Phimosis is define as unretractable prepuce and has two different clinical presentation; pathological (PaP) and physiological. Physiological phimosis (PhP) is a common condition in children that does not require treatment. In our study, we aimed to determine the actual requirement for circumcision in patients with phimosis who were recommended circumcision. Material and Methods: Children who were offered circumcision due to phimosis between July 2019 and January 2020 and applied to the pediatric surgery and pediatric urology outpatient clinic were included in the study. They were evaluated in terms of referring physicians, genital examination findings and requirement for circumcision. Results: Between the study dates, 199 patients applied for circumcision due to phimosis.  126 patients are under one year old, 73 patients are over one year old. PhP was present in 194 of the patients and PaP in 5 of them. While PaP is not detected in patients under one year of age, there are 5 patients with PaP over one year of age (2%). There was no requirement for urgent circumcision in any of the patients. Genital examination revealed incidentally undescended testicle in 3 patients and hydrocele in 12 children. Conclusion: Male genital system examination and pathological findings are not well known by physicians. We think that there is a need for detailed training for physicians regarding PhP and childhood testicle pathologies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document