A constitutional diagram of the system TiC?HfC?WC

1977 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1189-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rogl ◽  
Subhash K. Naik ◽  
Erwin Rudy
1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1497-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.D. Guseinov ◽  
G.B. Abdullayev ◽  
E.M. Gojayev ◽  
LàA. Rzayeva ◽  
G.A. Agayev

1977 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 1339-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rogl ◽  
Subhash K. Naik ◽  
Erwin Rudy

JOM ◽  
1953 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-548
Author(s):  
H. A. Saller ◽  
F. A. Rough

1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (18) ◽  
pp. 3417-3427 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Pickwick ◽  
W. A. Alexander ◽  
R. H. Gamble

A constitutional diagram for magnesium–indium alloys containing between 23.2 and 100 atomic % indium has been established using differential thermal analysis, electrical resistivity, and metallographic methods.An intermediate solid solution, β, with a wide range of homogeneity, is formed peritectically from the liquid and α, the magnesium primary solid solution. It extends between 23 atomic % indium at 485.3 °C and 86 atomic % indium at 160.2 °C, where it is in equilibrium with γ, the indium primary solid solution. Magnesium has a limited solid solubility in indium of about 6 atomic %.For alloys containing up to 50 atomic % indium, the derived constitutional diagram is in good agreement with that of a previous investigation (2). Two exceptions are noted: first, there is no evidence of a long period superlattice, β′′′ of the CuAu II type, and second, a reaction is observed involving a transition between the two ordered phases β′ and β′′. For the indium-rich alloys no intermediate or ordered phase formation is observed.The results have been discussed in terms of the existing phase diagrams.


1977 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1213-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Rogl ◽  
Subhash K. Naik ◽  
Erwin Rudy

1969 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Sears ◽  
L.M. Ferris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document