VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution

1990 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Jaśkowski ◽  
Antoni Pruszewicz ◽  
Piotr Świdzinski
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Time Distribution ◽  
Reaction Time Distribution ◽  
Motor Reaction ◽  
Motor Reaction Time ◽  
Simple Motor ◽  
Vep Latency

Simple Reaction Time and Perception of Temporal Order: Dissociations and Hypotheses

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Jaśkowski
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Simple Reaction Time ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Motor Reaction ◽  
Motor Reaction Time ◽  
Simple Reaction ◽  
Simple Motor ◽  
Perceptual Latency

Simple motor reaction time and judgment of temporal order are commonly recognized as two methods for estimation of perceptual latency. Unfortunately, the results obtained by the methods under the same conditions do not agree. We review hypotheses attempting to explain the disagreement. Although some of these seem to be promising, no one at present could be fully accepted.

Brainstem frequency-following response and simple motor reaction time

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary C Galbraith ◽  
Bryan C Chae ◽  
Jason R Cooper ◽  
Mark M Gindi ◽  
Timothy N Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Reaction ◽  
Motor Reaction Time ◽  
Frequency Following Response ◽  
Simple Motor

Fluctuations in regional BOLD signal measured prior to trial presentation predict performance on a simple motor reaction time task

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S155
Author(s):  
Oliver Hinds ◽  
Todd Thompson ◽  
Susa Whitfield-Gabrieli ◽  
Chri Triantafyllou ◽  
John Gabrieli
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Reaction Time Task ◽  
Bold Signal ◽  
Motor Reaction ◽  
Motor Reaction Time ◽  
Time Task ◽  
Simple Motor

scholarly journals Gap effect and reaction time distribution: simple vs choice manual responses

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1313-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Machado-Pinheiro ◽  
L.G. Gawryszewski ◽  
L.E. Ribeiro-do-Valle
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Time Distribution ◽  
Reaction Time Distribution ◽  
Gap Effect ◽  
Manual Responses

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF FEMALE TABLE TENNIS SPORT PERFORMANCE BY SENZOR MOTORIC REACTION TIME

GYMNASIUM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol XVII (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrieta Hornigova ◽  
Ladislava Dolezajova ◽  
Jaromir Sedlacek ◽  
Peter Sagat ◽  
Gheorghe Balint
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Lower Extremities ◽  
Sport Performance ◽  
Table Tennis ◽  
Motor Reaction ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Tennis Players ◽  
Motor Reaction Time ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Significant Difference

In the sport performance structure of table tennis is sensor motor reaction time one of the most important factors for reaching top-level results, both in males and females groups. In this research we watched 23 female table tennis players from Slovakia; 9 mini cadets (12-13 years), 6 cadets (14-15 years) and 8 juniors (16-18 years). Girls were tested by modified agility test for table tennis players (Vacenovsky & Vencurik, 2013) with machine FITRO Agility check. Thus we gained their sensor motor reaction times. By Mann-Whitney U-test we studied differences between age categories, upper and lower extremities, dominant (forehand) and un-dominant (backhand) side, right and left-handed players. We used significance level p<0.05. In our research we did not confirm expected results that the older groups have shorter sensor motor reaction time. We also expected shorter reaction time of upper extremities comparing lower extremities; this was confirmed, though there was found statistical significant difference only in juniors group. Groups of mini-cadets and cadets have better (shorter) sensor motor reaction time from backhand side, while group of junior is better from forehand side. We also confirmed that left-handed players have slightly shorter reaction time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document