Another role for citizens: Three variations of citizen evaluation review

1980 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan Wagner Zinober ◽  
Nancy R. Dinkel ◽  
Gerald Landsberg ◽  
Charles Windle
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 02003
Author(s):  
Nicolas Houel ◽  
Dany Joly ◽  
Laurent Lescop

The recent introduction of digital tools in public lighting represents a milestone in the evolution of street lighting. Simultaneously to this innovation phase, urban lighting is currently being studied in terms of energy and environmental sobriety, to reduce its financial and ecological impact. This study presents the observations and evaluations carried out by nocturnal urban dwellers of an experimental public lighting system, set up in real conditions. The evaluations question the relevance of sensors integrated to the lighting material in real time via a series of survey managed autonomously by residents of the experimental environment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haina Yan ◽  
Yuan Ting

Since the 1990s, more local governments across China have launched Internet-based citizen participation in government performance evaluation. However, we know little about how it is perceived by bureaucrats whose attitudes are critical in determining the outcome of this citizen participation. In this article, we present an analytical framework to identify major factors influencing bureaucratic perceptions of the effectiveness of online citizen participation. We use survey data collected from local government bureaucrats in Guangdong Province, China, to test our research hypotheses. The results suggest that the effectiveness of online civic participation is primarily a function of citizens’ capacity and motivation, inter-agency difference, and administrative burden. This article concludes with a discussion about how our study extends previous research on citizen participation and the implications for practitioners and future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document