In what ways do characteristics of psychiatric services determine contact rates and use of services? The Nordic Comparative Study on Sectorized Psychiatry

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Hansson
1998 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Outi Saarento ◽  
Görgen Göstas ◽  
Sten Muus ◽  
Mikael Sandlund ◽  
Hanne Vinding ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Hansson ◽  
T. Öiesvold ◽  
G. Göstas ◽  
M. Kastrup ◽  
O. Lönnerberg ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Saarento ◽  
T. Öiesvold ◽  
G. Göstas ◽  
A. Lindhardt ◽  
M. Sandlund ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. øiesvold ◽  
O. Saarento ◽  
S. Sytema ◽  
L. Christiansen ◽  
G. Göstas ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Saarento ◽  
S Räsänen ◽  
P Nieminen ◽  
H Hakko ◽  
M Isohanni

1990 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Mino ◽  
Ryosei Kodera ◽  
Paul Bebbington

Psychiatric services in Japan and England are compared using government statistics. In Japan, the number of in-patients per 100 000 population has increased from the 1950s, while that of England has decreased since 1954. Since 1972 the prevalence of in-patients has been higher in Japan than in England. The admission rate is lower in Japan than in England, and there are more long-stay patients. Most Japanese in-patients are admitted compulsorily, whereas most are admitted voluntarily in England. The attendance at out-patient clinics is higher in Japan than in England, but there are far fewer day-hospital places in Japan. Differing government policies are the main reason for these differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document