Differential effect of amino acid starvation on polysome decay in escherichia coli

1978 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Roche ◽  
A. J. Cozzone ◽  
P. Donini ◽  
V. Santonastaso
2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 570-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Gropp ◽  
Yael Strausz ◽  
Miriam Gross ◽  
Gad Glaser

ABSTRACT The E. coli RelA protein is a ribosome-dependent (p)ppGpp synthetase that is activated in response to amino acid starvation. RelA can be dissected both functionally and physically into two domains: The N-terminal domain (NTD) (amino acids [aa] 1 to 455) contains the catalytic domain of RelA, and the C-terminal domain (CTD) (aa 455 to 744) is involved in regulating RelA activity. We used mutational analysis to localize sites important for RelA activity and control in these two domains. We inserted two separate mutations into the NTD, which resulted in mutated RelA proteins that were impaired in their ability to synthesize (p)ppGpp. When we caused the CTD inrelA + cells to be overexpressed, (p)ppGpp accumulation during amino acid starvation was negatively affected. Mutational analysis showed that Cys-612, Asp-637, and Cys-638, found in a conserved amino acid sequence (aa 612 to 638), are essential for this negative effect of the CTD. When mutations corresponding to these residues were inserted into the full-length relA gene, the mutated RelA proteins were impaired in their regulation. In attempting to clarify the mechanism through which the CTD regulates RelA activity, we found no evidence for competition for ribosomal binding between the normal RelA and the overexpressed CTD. Results from CyaA complementation experiments of the bacterial two-hybrid system fusion plasmids (G. Karimova, J. Pidoux, A. Ullmann, and D. Ladant, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5752–5756, 1998) indicated that the CTD (aa 564 to 744) is involved in RelA-RelA interactions. Our findings support a model in which RelA activation is regulated by its oligomerization state.


1965 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. R. Reeve ◽  
J. O. Bishop

A multi-step Chloramphenicol (CM)-resistant derivative of an RC-stringent strain of Escherichia coli auxotrophic for threonine and leucine was resistant also to Aureomycin (AM) and Puromycin (PM). All three antibiotics released the repression of RNA synthesis due to amino acid starvation in the CM-sensitive parent strain, their relative activities being about 1:10:100 for AM: CM: PM. High doses of AM and CM failed to induce RNA synthesis. The CM-resistant strain required greater concentrations of each antibiotic than the sensitive strain to induce the same level of RNA synthesis, and appeared to be about one hundred times, ten times and five times more resistant to CM, AM and PM, respectively, than the sensitive strain.


1960 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avram Goldstein ◽  
Beverly J. Brown

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1128-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Traxler ◽  
Sean M. Summers ◽  
Huyen-Tran Nguyen ◽  
Vineetha M. Zacharia ◽  
G. Aaron Hightower ◽  
...  

1965 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Hollom ◽  
R. H. Pritchard

From studies involving inhibition of DNA synthesis in Hfr strains ofEscherichia coliK12, either by thymine starvation (Pritchard, 1963) or amino-acid starvation (Suit, Matney, Doudney & Billen, 1964), during mating withF−strains, it has been concluded that transfer of DNA from males to females can occur in the absence of DNA synthesis. This conclusion is at variance with the hypothesis (Jacob, Brenner & Cuzin, 1963) that the energy required for transfer is derived from the process of DNA replication. On the other hand, a second prediction from this hypothesis, that one polynucleotide chain of the DNA transferred during mating will have been synthesized during transfer, is strongly supported by recent experiments (Ptashne, 1965; Blinkova, Bresler & Lanzov, 1965; Gross & Caro, 1965).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document