Classical mechanics in Galilean space-time

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 679-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray E. Artz
1991 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1788-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Zerzion ◽  
L. P. Horwitz ◽  
R. I. Arshansky

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (32) ◽  
pp. 4641-4650
Author(s):  
ARVIND KUMAR

The recent deterministic quantum theory of Roy and Singh is shown to be covariant with respect to Galilean, space reflection and time reversal transformations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1450086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horace W. Crater ◽  
Luca Lusanna

After a review of the existing theory of non-inertial frames and mathematical observers in Minkowski space-time we give the explicit expression of a family of such frames obtained from the inertial ones by means of point-dependent Lorentz transformations as suggested by the locality principle. These non-inertial frames have non-Euclidean 3-spaces and contain the differentially rotating ones in Euclidean 3-spaces as a subcase. Then we discuss how to replace mathematical accelerated observers with dynamical ones (their world-lines belong to interacting particles in an isolated system) and how to define Unruh–DeWitt detectors without using mathematical Rindler uniformly accelerated observers. Also some comments are done on the transition from relativistic classical mechanics to relativistic quantum mechanics in non-inertial frames.


1980 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2384-2386 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Roy Choudhury ◽  
S. Roy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Kamal

Utilizing multiple theorems derived from and formulating the equation : Z = {∀Θ ∈ Z → ∃s ∈ P S ∧ ∃t ∈ T : Θ = (s, t)} and formulating the equation: X = O + Ĥ + (n(log)Φ Pd x ), as well as some mathematical constraints and numerous implications in Quantum Physics, Classical Mechanics, and Algorithmic Quantization, we come up with a framework for mathematically representing our universe. These series of individualized papers make up a huge part of a dissertation on the subject matter of Quantum Similarity. Everything including how we view time itself and the origin point for our universe is explained in theoretical details throughout these papers.


10.14311/1809 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frieder Kleefeld

According to some generalized correspondence principle the classical limit of a non-Hermitian quantum theory describing quantum degrees of freedom is expected to be the well known classical mechanics of classical degrees of freedom in the complex phase space, i.e., some phase space spanned by complex-valued space and momentum coordinates. As special relativity was developed by Einstein merely for real-valued space-time and four-momentum, we will try to understand how special relativity and covariance can be extended to complex-valued space-time and four-momentum. Our considerations will lead us not only to some unconventional derivation of Lorentz transformations for complex-valued velocities, but also to the non-Hermitian Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, which are to lay the foundations of a non-Hermitian quantum theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document