Ferritic stainless steels with high chromium concentrations that are tough and resistant to corrosion cracking, pitting corrosion, and stress corrosion

1975 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-271
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (07) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper NACE 2020-14695, “Comparison of Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior of Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-Based High-Chromium Stainless Steels in High-Pressure/High-Temperature CO2 Environments,” by Yameng Qi, Zhonghua Zhang, and Chunxia Zhang, Baoshan Iron and Steel, prepared for the 2020 NACE International Corrosion Conference and Exposition, Houston, 14–18 June. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys in high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) carbon dioxide (CO2) environments was investigated through slow-strain-rate tests (SSRTs) and electrochemical methods. The results show that a remarkable decrease in tensile strength and elongation to failure was observed when testing in a CO2 environment compared with that of air. Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys possessed better SCC resistance than Fe13Cr5Ni-based alloys. The better SCC resistance of the former could be attributed to good repassivation capacity and pitting-corrosion resistance induced by the increase in chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) content. Introduction When service temperature exceeds 150°C, SCC resistance of Fe13Cr5Ni-based alloys could become an issue. Compared with Fe13Cr5Ni-based alloys, 22Cr duplex stainless steel has an excel-lent performance when exposed to temperatures over 150°C and stable SCC resistance in HP/HT CO2 environments. However, the cost of 22Cr duplex stainless steel is extremely high. Experimental Procedure Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys were produced by the authors’ research institute. The materials were in a quenched and tempered state. For micrographic observation, each specimen was ground with 2,000-grit carbide silicon paper and polished with 1.2-µm diamond paste. They were then degreased with acetone and etched with hydrochloric ferric chloride solution (a mixture of 5-g ferric chloride, 25-mL hydrochloric acid, and 25-mL ethanol). The steel microstructures were characterized using an optical micro-scope. The micrograph in Fig. 1a for the F-13Cr5Ni-based alloys shows a martensite phase with no notable second phases. Fe17Cr5.5Ni alloys possess long strip ferrite and martensite phases (Fig. 1b). For SSRTs, smooth tensile specimens with a gauge length of 25.4 mm and a diameter of 3.81 mm were prepared. The specimens were cut from the Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys into an 8-mm-thick, 12-mm-outer- diameter disc for electrochemical measurement. All specimens were polished to a 1,200-grit surface finish, degreased with acetone, cleansed with distilled water, and dried in air. SSRT and electrochemical-measurement procedures are detailed in the complete paper. Results SCC Susceptibility. As expected, tensile strength and elongation to failure of Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys deteriorated in HP/HT CO2 environments. Compared with an environment of air, the elongation to failure of Fe13Cr5Ni- and Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys in HP/HT CO2 environments decreased by approximately 30 and 25%, respectively. In addition, tensile strength and elongation to failure of Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys were greater than those of Fe13Cr5Ni-based alloys. Elongation, reduction in area, and time to failure of Fe17Cr5.5Ni-based alloys were found to be much higher than that of Fe13Cr5Ni-based alloys in HP/HT CO2 environments. It can be concluded that Fe17Cr5.5Ni alloys possess better SCC resistance than Fe13Cr5Ni alloys in these environments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Mariano A. Kappes

AbstractFluorides, bromides, and iodides, despite being less common than chlorides, are present in various environments of industrial relevance. Stainless steels suffer pitting corrosion in solutions of all halides except fluorides, which can be understood considering that fluoride is the anion of a weak acid. The aggressiveness of the rest of the halides for pitting corrosion is on the order Cl− > Br− > I− for stainless steels with Mo content below 3 wt.%. Mo is not as effective in inhibiting Br− pitting corrosion as it is for inhibiting Cl− pitting corrosion. Most of those observations were rationalized based on the effect of anions on pit growth kinetics. Sensitized austenitic stainless steel suffers stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in solutions of all halides, albeit chlorides seem to be the most aggressive. Fluoride SCC is relevant for SCC under insulation of stainless steels, and standards and regulations developed to mitigate this problem consider this ion as aggressive as chloride. For the solubilized stainless steels, aggressiveness toward SCC is in the order Cl− > Br−. The SCC of solubilized stainless steels was not observed in solutions of F− and I−, and the possible reasons for this fact are discussed.


CORROSION ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. BOND ◽  
H. J. DUNDAS

Abstract U-bend and axially loaded tensile-type specimens were used in stress corrosion tests performed in boiling 140 C (284 F) magnesium chloride solution. The experimental ferritic alloys tested contained 17 to 25% chromium, 0 to 4% nickel, 0 to 2% copper, and 0 to 5% molybdenum. Alloys essentially free of nickel and copper did not undergo stress corrosion cracking. (Tests on Types 430 and 434 stainless steels confirmed this behavior.) However, alloys containing more than 1% nickel or 0.5% copper were subject to transgi anular stress corrosion cracking in boiling magnesium chloride solution. Critical concentrations of copper and nickel that produce susceptibility to cracking were determined at various chromium and molybdenum levels. Experiments at controlled potentials indicated that cracking in boiling magnesium chloride was not the result of hydrogen embrittlement.


CORROSION ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. E. Locci ◽  
H. K. Kwon ◽  
R. F. Hehemann ◽  
A. R. Troiano

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document