Analytical possibilities of an atomic absorption apparatus with a ?refractory boat? nonflame atomizer

1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-212
Author(s):  
O. Yu. Begak ◽  
M. P. Vasil'ev
1970 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Smith ◽  
J. R. Johnson ◽  
G. C. Soth

Atomic absorption procedures have been developed for the determination of manganese and silicon in ferromanganese and in silicomanganese, chromium and silicon in three different grades of ferrochromium, silicon in ferrosilicon, vanadium in ferrovanadium, titanium in ferrotitanium, boron in ferroboron, and columbium in ferrocolumbium. In most cases a sample is dissolved by a combination of inorganic acids, including hydrofluoric, and using plastic laboratory ware. A sodium carbonate fusion of the acid insoluble portion of ferroboron is employed. A sodium peroxide fusion is used on the acid insoluble portion of one grade of ferrochromium. No separation of elements or reduction of iron concentration is required. All procedures use a nitrous oxide–acetylene flame and a laminar flow burner with any conventional atomic absorption apparatus. Calibration curves were prepared using either U. S. Bureau of Standards samples or analyzed samples of purchased ferroalloys.


1976 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 653-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Zama ◽  
Yukiko Dokiya ◽  
Motohiro Fukami ◽  
Shiro Aizawa ◽  
Miwako Hamachi ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-202
Author(s):  
Shiro Aizawa ◽  
Etsuro Yoshimura ◽  
Miwako Hamachi ◽  
Hiroki Haraguchi ◽  
Yukiko Dokiya ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert E. Ogilvie

The search for an empirical absorption equation begins with the work of Siegbahn (1) in 1914. At that time Siegbahn showed that the value of (μ/ρ) for a given element could be expressed as a function of the wavelength (λ) of the x-ray photon by the following equationwhere C is a constant for a given material, which will have sudden jumps in value at critial absorption limits. Siegbahn found that n varied from 2.66 to 2.71 for various solids, and from 2.66 to 2.94 for various gases.Bragg and Pierce (2) , at this same time period, showed that their results on materials ranging from Al(13) to Au(79) could be represented by the followingwhere μa is the atomic absorption coefficient, Z the atomic number. Today equation (2) is known as the “Bragg-Pierce” Law. The exponent of 5/2(n) was questioned by many investigators, and that n should be closer to 3. The work of Wingardh (3) showed that the exponent of Z should be much lower, p = 2.95, however, this is much lower than that found by most investigators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document