Determination of the square of the matrix element for the dipole moment of the electronic transition in the first negative system of N 2 +

1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-167
Author(s):  
V. N. Egorov ◽  
L. N. Tunitskii
1974 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-376
Author(s):  
N. E. Kuz'menko ◽  
L. A. Kuznetsova ◽  
Yu. Ya. Kuzyakov ◽  
B. N. Chuev

1970 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. Ya. Kuzyakov ◽  
I. E. Ovcharenko ◽  
N. E. Kuz'menko ◽  
I. N. Kurdyumova

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (31) ◽  
pp. 20497-20503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Toffoletti ◽  
Zhijia Wang ◽  
Jianzhang Zhao ◽  
Matteo Tommasini ◽  
Antonio Barbon

Precise determination, in isotropic samples, of the electronic transition dipole moment orientation in the molecular frame by exploiting magnetophotoselection effects.


2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-393
Author(s):  
O. Yu. Shevchenko ◽  
V. F. Radantsev ◽  
A. M. Yafyasov ◽  
V. B. Bozhevol’nov ◽  
I. M. Ivankiv ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi KIYOKAWA ◽  
Hitoshi YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Ryosuke HASEGAWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Fanciulli ◽  
Hugo Dil

The Eisenbud-Wigner-Smith (EWS) time delay of photoemission depends on the phase term of the matrix element describing the transition. Because of an interference process between partial channels, the photoelectrons acquire a spin polarization which is also related to the phase term. The analytical model for estimating the time delay by measuring the spin polarization is reviewed in this manuscript. In particular, the distinction between scattering EWS and interfering EWS time delay will be introduced, providing an insight in the chronoscopy of photoemission. The method is applied to the recent experimental data for Cu(111) presented in M. Fanciulli et al., PRL 118, 067402 (2017), allowing to give better upper and lower bounds and estimates for the EWS time delays.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radojko Jacimovic ◽  
Trajce Stafilov ◽  
Vekoslava Stibilj ◽  
Milena Taseska ◽  
Petre Makreski

<p>Various trace elements in different types of arsenic (orpiment, As<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>; realgar, As<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>; lorandite, TlAsS<sub>2</sub>), antimony (stibnite, Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>), copper (brochantite, Cu<sub>4</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>(OH)<sub>6</sub>; chalcanthite, CuSO<sub>4</sub>·5H<sub>2</sub>O; chalcopyrite, CuFeS<sub>2</sub>; covellite, CuS; native copper, Cu) and iron based geological materials (hematite, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>; pyrite, FeS<sub>2</sub>; chalcopyrite, CuFeS<sub>2</sub>) were determined using <em>k</em><sub>0</sub>-method of neutron activation analysis (<em>k</em><sub>0</sub>-NAA) in both forms: instrumental (<em>k</em><sub>0</sub>-INAA) and radiochemical (<em>k</em><sub>0</sub>-RNAA). In order to avoid interferences from the matrix element (As, Sb, Cu and Fe), various procedures were applied for its removal. Elimination of the matrix element enabled investigation from 35 to 47 trace elements in the samples using short (up to few minutes) and long (up to 20 hours) irradiations in typical irradiation channels of TRIGA reactor. The minerals were collected from various localities within the Republic of Macedonia, except covellite, which was obtained from Bor, Serbia.</p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunio TAKADA ◽  
Tetsuya ASHINO ◽  
Tsutomu SYOJI ◽  
Toshiko ITAGAKI ◽  
Kazuaki WAGATSUMA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document