scholarly journals Transrectal ultrasound of the prostatic urethra related to urodynamically assessed urethral resistance

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jansen ◽  
R. van Mastrigt ◽  
M. Kranse
2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdem Kisa ◽  
Hüseyin Salih Semiz ◽  
Ülkü Küçük ◽  
Yusuf Özlem İlbey

Introduction: Primary carcinomas of the urethra differ by location and histologic subtype. Primary urethral cancer of the proximal urethra is rare and aggressive tumor with a high propensity for regional and distant metastases. Case description: In this case report, we present primary urothelial carcinoma of the prostatic urethra, diagnosed by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate and having multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis. Metastatic patients were initiated chemotherapy according to the histological type of urethral cancer. Conclusion: Urothelial carcinomas of the urethra are rarely seen, and therefore there is no standard treatment regimen for early-stage or metastatic disease. Gemcitabine-, platinum-, and taxane-based treatments are used in the metastatic stage.


Author(s):  
D Fischerova ◽  
D Cibula ◽  
M Zikan ◽  
P Calda ◽  
H Vondrichova ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (3+4) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki KAMISHIMA ◽  
Mika MISHINA ◽  
Toshifumi WATANABE

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Derek Cool ◽  
Shi Sherebrin ◽  
Jonathan Izawa ◽  
Joseph Chin ◽  
Aaron Fenster

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy (Bx) is currently confined to 2D information to both target and record 3D Bx locations. Accurate placement of Bx needles cannot be verified without 3D information, and recording Bx sites in 2D does not provide sufficient information to accurately guide the high incidence of repeat Bx. We have designed a 3D TRUS prostate Bx system that augments the current 2D TRUS system and provides tools for biopsy-planning, needle guidance, and recording of the biopsy core locations entirely in 3D. Methods: Our Bx system displays a 3D model of the patient’s prostate, which is generated intra-procedure from a collection of 2D TRUS images, representative of the particular prostate shape. Bx targets are selected, needle guidance is facilitated, and 3D Bx sites are recorded within the 3D context of the prostate model. The complete 3D Bx system was validated, in vitro, by performing standard ten-core Bx on anatomical phantoms of two patient’s prostates. The accuracy of the needle-guidance, Bx location recording, and 3D model volume and surface topology were validated against a CT gold standard. Results: The Bx system successfully reconstructed the 3D patient prostate models with a mean volume error of 3.2 ± 7.6%. Using the 3D system, needles were accurately guided to the pre-determined targets with a mean error of 2.26 ± 1.03 mm and the 3D locations of the Bx cores were accurately recorded with a mean distance error of 1.47 ± 0.79 mm. Conclusion: We have successfully developed a 3D TRUS prostate biopsy system and validated the system in vitro. A pilot study has been initiated to apply the system clinically.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document