Configuration interaction methods for improving unrestricted Hartree-Fock spin densities

1979 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Terry Amos ◽  
Donald R. Beck ◽  
Ian L. Cooper
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Nite ◽  
Carlos A. Jimenez-Hoyos

Quantum chemistry methods that describe excited states on the same footing as the ground state are generally scarce. In previous work, Gill et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 13164 (2008)) and later Sundstrom and Head-Gordon (J. Chem. Phys. 140, 114103 (2014)) considered excited states resulting from a non-orthogonal configuration interaction (NOCI) on stationary solutions of the Hartree–Fock equations. We build upon those contributions and present the state-averaged resonating Hartree–Fock (sa-ResHF) method, which differs from NOCI in that spin-projection and orbital relaxation effects are incorporated from the onset. Our results in a set of small molecules (alanine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, formamide, and ethylene) suggest that sa-ResHF excitation energies are a notable improvement over configuration interaction singles (CIS), at a mean-field computational cost. The orbital relaxation in sa-ResHF, in the presence of a spin-projection operator, generally results in excitation energies that are closer to the experimental values than the corresponding NOCI ones.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Nite ◽  
Carlos A. Jimenez-Hoyos

Quantum chemistry methods that describe excited states on the same footing as the ground state are generally scarce. In previous work, Gill et al. (J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 13164 (2008)) and later Sundstrom and Head-Gordon (J. Chem. Phys. 140, 114103 (2014)) considered excited states resulting from a non-orthogonal configuration interaction (NOCI) on stationary solutions of the Hartree–Fock equations. We build upon those contributions and present the state-averaged resonating Hartree–Fock (sa-ResHF) method, which differs from NOCI in that spin-projection and orbital relaxation effects are incorporated from the onset. Our results in a set of small molecules (alanine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, formamide, and ethylene) suggest that sa-ResHF excitation energies are a notable improvement over configuration interaction singles (CIS), at a mean-field computational cost. The orbital relaxation in sa-ResHF, in the presence of a spin-projection operator, generally results in excitation energies that are closer to the experimental values than the corresponding NOCI ones.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betül Karaçoban ◽  
Leyla Özdemir

The transition parameters such as the wavelengths, weighted oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities (or rates) for the nd (n=5−9)−nf (n=4−8), nd (n=5−9)−np (n=6−9), np (n=6−9)−ns (n=6−10), and ng (n=5−8)−nf (n=4−8) electric dipole (E1) transitions of doubly ionized lanthanum (La III, Z=57) have been calculated using the relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method. In this method, configuration interaction and relativistic effects have been included in the computations combined with a least squares fitting of the Hamiltonian eigenvalues to the observed energy levels. We have compared the results obtained from this work with the previously available calculations and experiments in literature. We have also reported new transitions with the weighted transition probabilities greater than or equal to 105.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Moreira de Cerqueira Sobrinho ◽  
Micael Dias de Andrade ◽  
Marco Antônio Chaer Nascimento ◽  
Luiz Augusto Carvalho Malbouisson

In molecular theory the wave function is usually constructed from antisymmetrized products, or ‘Slater determinants’, of one-electron ‘orbitals’. A single determinant of suitably chosen, doubly occupied orbitals is often a fair approximation to a singlet ground state; but when more general products are admitted, as in ‘configuration interaction’ calculations, it is first necessary to resolve a high ‘spin degeneracy’ by constructing spin eigenfunctions (SE’s). In §1, the fundamental basis of recent methods (McWeeny 1954 b ) is clarified by a group theoretical approach. Next, in §2, the energy expression, using as wave function an arbitrary mixture of similar SE’s, is written very simply in terms of the reduced density matrices for one and two particles, and formulae for the calculation of these matrices are given. The remaining problem is to get a ‘best’ wave function, usually with limited configuration interaction, by (i) variation of SE coefficients and (ii) variation of the orbitals appearing in the SE’s; this problem is formally solved in §3. (i) is the usual configuration interaction process; but (ii) is new and leads, when the orbitals are expressed in terms of a standard basic set (e.g. of atomic orbitals), to a complete generalization of the Roothaan 1951) equations. These (matrix) equations are simple in appearance, but their numerical solution calls for new techniques; and it is possible that the Roothaan (i.e. Hartree–Fock) approach, followed by configuration interaction, provides about the best working compromise between (i) and (ii). In §4, some points of contact between one- and many-configuration theories are noted. In particular, certain density matrix elements provide appropriate generalizations of the ‘charges’ and ‘bond orders’ of Coulson and Longuet-Higgins and continue to describe the response of a system to changes in its ‘Coulomb’ and ‘resonance’ integrals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document