Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): behavioral and ecological aspects of recruitment communication

Oecologia ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. A. Traniello
1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 2170-2177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osamu Katano ◽  
Kei'ichiroh Iguchi

We observed 10 categories of behaviour in 133 ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, kept individually in isolated aquaria, and separated three individuality components, aggressiveness, activity, and slow reaction, by factor analysis. We then divided 84 of the fish into 14 groups, each comprising 6 individuals, and released each group into one of four ponds designed to simulate natural streams for a 10-day period to investigate their territory formation and growth rates. Individuals that showed aggression towards an ayu model in the aquaria tended to engage in many aggressive interactions with other individuals in the ponds. Large and active individuals from the aquaria were dominant over other individuals in the ponds. The increase in aggressive interactions and percentage of encounters won increased the territorial period of individual fish. Growth rate was significantly correlated with territorial period, indicating that individual differences were important in social organization and individual foraging success.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin P. Friesen ◽  
Aaron C. Kay ◽  
Richard P. Eibach ◽  
Adam D. Galinsky

Author(s):  
T.I., Abdulganieva ◽  
◽  
Sh.G. Samedov ◽  
S.A., Mamaev ◽  
A.S. Kurbanismailova ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
David MacInnes

The nature of social organization during the Orcadian Neolithic has been the subject of discussion for several decades with much of the debate focused on answering an insightful question posed by Colin Renfrew in 1979. He asked, how was society organised to construct the larger, innovative monuments of the Orcadian Late Neolithic that were centralised in the western Mainland? There are many possible answers to the question but little evidence pointing to a probable solution, so the discussion has continued for many years. This paper takes a new approach by asking a different question: what can be learned about Orcadian Neolithic social organization from the quantitative and qualitative evidence accumulating from excavated domestic structures and settlements?In an attempt to answer this question, quantitative and qualitative data about domestic structures and about settlements was collected from published reports on 15 Orcadian Neolithic excavated sites. The published data is less extensive than hoped but is sufficient to support a provisional answer: a social hierarchy probably did not develop in the Early Neolithic but almost certainly did in the Late Neolithic, for which the data is more comprehensive.While this is only one approach of several possible ways to consider the question, it is by exploring different methods of analysis and comparing them that an understanding of the Orcadian Neolithic can move forward.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document