Voltage- and concentration-dependent effects of lidocaine on cardiac Na channel and Ca channel gating charge movements

1994 ◽  
Vol 428 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 485-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira R. Josephson ◽  
Yong Cui
Keyword(s):  
Channel Gating ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
Ca Channel ◽  
Gating Charge ◽  
Charge Movements

scholarly journals Nonlinear charge movement in mammalian cardiac ventricular cells. Components from Na and Ca channel gating.

1989 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
B P Bean ◽  
E Rios
Keyword(s):  
Channel Gating ◽  
Cell Voltage ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Ca Channel ◽  
Gating Current ◽  
Channel Inactivation ◽  
Gating Charge ◽  
Ventricular Cells ◽  
Extra Charge

Intramembrane charge movement was recorded in rat and rabbit ventricular cells using the whole-cell voltage clamp technique. Na and K currents were eliminated by using tetraethylammonium as the main cation internally and externally, and Ca channel current was blocked by Cd and La. With steps in the range of -110 to -150 used to define linear capacitance, extra charge moves during steps positive to approximately -70 mV. With holding potentials near -100 mV, the extra charge moving outward on depolarization (ON charge) is roughly equal to the extra charge moving inward on repolarization (OFF charge) after 50-100 ms. Both ON and OFF charge saturate above approximately +20 mV; saturating charge movement is approximately 1,100 fC (approximately 11 nC/muF of linear capacitance). When the holding potential is depolarized to -50 mV, ON charge is reduced by approximately 40%, with little change in OFF charge. The reduction of ON charge by holding potential in this range matches inactivation of Na current measured in the same cells, suggesting that this component might arise from Na channel gating. The ON charge remaining at a holding potential of -50 mV has properties expected of Ca channel gating current: it is greatly reduced by application of 10 muM D600 when accompanied by long depolarizations and it is reduced at more positive holding potentials with a voltage dependence similar to that of Ca channel inactivation. However, the D600-sensitive charge movement is much larger than the Ca channel gating current that would be expected if the movement of channel gating charge were always accompanied by complete opening of the channel.

scholarly journals Molecular Action of Lidocaine on the Voltage Sensors of Sodium Channels

2003 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Sheets ◽  
Dorothy A. Hanck
Keyword(s):  
Channel Gating ◽  
Ionic Current ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Charge Movement ◽  
Charge Voltage ◽  
Voltage Sensors ◽  
Gating Charge ◽  
Voltage Dependent ◽  
Domain Iii

Block of sodium ionic current by lidocaine is associated with alteration of the gating charge-voltage (Q-V) relationship characterized by a 38% reduction in maximal gating charge (Qmax) and by the appearance of additional gating charge at negative test potentials. We investigated the molecular basis of the lidocaine-induced reduction in cardiac Na channel–gating charge by sequentially neutralizing basic residues in each of the voltage sensors (S4 segments) in the four domains of the human heart Na channel (hH1a). By determining the relative reduction in the Qmax of each mutant channel modified by lidocaine we identified those S4 segments that contributed to a reduction in gating charge. No interaction of lidocaine was found with the voltage sensors in domains I or II. The largest inhibition of charge movement was found for the S4 of domain III consistent with lidocaine completely inhibiting its movement. Protection experiments with intracellular MTSET (a charged sulfhydryl reagent) in a Na channel with the fourth outermost arginine in the S4 of domain III mutated to a cysteine demonstrated that lidocaine stabilized the S4 in domain III in a depolarized configuration. Lidocaine also partially inhibited movement of the S4 in domain IV, but lidocaine's most dramatic effect was to alter the voltage-dependent charge movement of the S4 in domain IV such that it accounted for the appearance of additional gating charge at potentials near −100 mV. These findings suggest that lidocaine's actions on Na channel gating charge result from allosteric coupling of the binding site(s) of lidocaine to the voltage sensors formed by the S4 segments in domains III and IV.

scholarly journals An Inactivation Stabilizer of the Na+ Channel Acts as an Opportunistic Pore Blocker Modulated by External Na+

2005 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Chin Yang ◽  
Chung-Chin Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Dissociation Constants ◽  
Channel Gating ◽  
Structural Motif ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
Channel Pore ◽  
Conduction Pathway ◽  
Gating Process ◽  
Pore Blocker

The Na+ channel is the primary target of anticonvulsants carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lamotrigine. These drugs modify Na+ channel gating as they have much higher binding affinity to the inactivated state than to the resting state of the channel. It has been proposed that these drugs bind to the Na+ channel pore with a common diphenyl structural motif. Diclofenac is a widely prescribed anti-inflammatory agent that has a similar diphenyl motif in its structure. In this study, we found that diclofenac modifies Na+ channel gating in a way similar to the foregoing anticonvulsants. The dissociation constants of diclofenac binding to the resting, activated, and inactivated Na+ channels are ∼880 μM, ∼88 μM, and ∼7 μM, respectively. The changing affinity well depicts the gradual shaping of a use-dependent receptor along the gating process. Most interestingly, diclofenac does not show the pore-blocking effect of carbamazepine on the Na+ channel when the external solution contains 150 mM Na+, but is turned into an effective Na+ channel pore blocker if the extracellular solution contains no Na+. In contrast, internal Na+ has only negligible effect on the functional consequences of diclofenac binding. Diclofenac thus acts as an “opportunistic” pore blocker modulated by external but not internal Na+, indicating that the diclofenac binding site is located at the junction of a widened part and an acutely narrowed part of the ion conduction pathway, and faces the extracellular rather than the intracellular solution. The diclofenac binding site thus is most likely located at the external pore mouth, and undergoes delicate conformational changes modulated by external Na+ along the gating process of the Na+ channel.

scholarly journals Water molecules in a pore during Na channel gating.

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (supplement) ◽  
pp. S59
Author(s):  
F. Kukita
Keyword(s):  
Channel Gating ◽  
Na Channel ◽  
Water Molecules
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document