On structural completeness of implicational logics

Studia Logica ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Wojtylak
Keyword(s):  
Structural Completeness ◽  
Implicational Logics

On structural completeness of Łukasiewicz's logics

Studia Logica ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Tokarz
Keyword(s):  
Structural Completeness

scholarly journals Structural Completeness in Relevance Logics

Studia Logica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Raftery ◽  
K. Świrydowicz
Keyword(s):  
Relevance Logics ◽  
Structural Completeness

Structural completeness in The War Is Over

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Jakob Isak Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Structural Completeness

Hereditarily structurally complete modal logics

1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 266-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Rybakov
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Modal Logics ◽  
Sufficient Condition ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Condition ◽  
Structural Completeness ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

AbstractWe consider structural completeness in modal logics. The main result is the necessary and sufficient condition for modal logics over K4 to be hereditarily structurally complete: a modal logic λ is hereditarily structurally complete iff λ is not included in any logic from the list of twenty special tabular logics. Hence there are exactly twenty maximal structurally incomplete modal logics above K4 and they are all tabular.

Compositionality, implicational logics, and theories of grammar

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glyn Morrill ◽  
Bob Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Implicational Logics

scholarly journals The Story Model of Judicial Decision-Making and Reasoning With Evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol VI (II) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Nasir Majeed ◽  
Ataullah Khan Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Narrative Theory ◽  
Abductive Reasoning ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Critical Questions ◽  
Story Model ◽  
Structural Completeness ◽  
Probability Approach

The argumentative approach, the probability approach, and the story model are the three normative frameworks to reasoning with judicial evidence. The story model describes that judges reach the final conclusion by going through three different stages. The model also offered certainty principles, including evidential coverage, coherence, consistency, plausibility, and structural completeness to evaluate the stories. Different researchers have criticized the story model by pointing out that the model does not elaborate the meaning of evidential coverage and plausibility. Additionally, the story model has also been charged on the ground that it does not guide how to evaluate evidential coverage or plausibility of a story and how to select the best story when judges make more than one story. The present study demonstrates that these shortcomings may be overcome by using anchored narrative theory, causal abductive reasoning, story schemes, critical questions, and principles of inference to the best explanation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document