Synchronous population fluctuations in voles, small game, owls, and tularemia in northern Sweden

Oecologia ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birger Hörnfeldt
Oikos ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Widén ◽  
Henrik Andrén ◽  
Per Angelstam ◽  
Erik Lindström ◽  
Per Widen ◽  
...  

Oecologia ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hörnfeldt ◽  
O. Löfgren ◽  
B. -G. Carlsson

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2705-2709 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Austin

The Chesapeake Bay, while a significant habitat for fisheries resources, is in actuality an aquatic “bedroom community”, as many of the economically important species are seasonally transient. The pressure on these resources due to their demand for human consumption and recreation, proximity to extensive industrial activity along the shores, and climate scale environmental fluctuations has resulted in stock declines by most important species. Our inability to separate natural population fluctuations from those of anthropogenic origin complicates management efforts. The only way to make these separations, and subsequent informed management decisions is by supporting long-term stock assessment programs (monitoring) in the Bay which allow us to examine trends, cycles and stochastic processes between resource and environment. These programs need to monitor both recruitment and fishing mortality rates of the economically important species, and to identify and monitor the environmentally sensitive “canary” species.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-42
Author(s):  
Flora Mary Bartlett

I examine how tensions between locals, environmentalists, and State politicians in a small town in northern Sweden are reinforced through national discourses of climate change and sustainability. Turbulence emerges across different scales of responsibility and environmental engagement in Arjeplog as politicians are seen by local inhabitants to be engaging more with the global conversation than with the local experience of living in the north. Moreover, many people view the environmentalist discourses from the politicians in the south, whom they deem to be out of touch with rural life, as threatening to the local experience of nature. These discourses pose a threat to their reliance on petrol, essential for travel, and are experienced locally as a continuation of the south’s historical interference in the region. Based on thirteen months of field research, I argue that mistrust of the various messengers of climate change, including politicians and environmentalists, is a crucial part of the scepticism towards the climate change discourse and that we as researchers need to utilise the strengths of anthropology in examining the reception (or refusal) of climate change. The locals’ mistrust of environment discourses had implications for my positionality, as I was associated with these perceived ‘outsider’ sensibilities. While the anthropology of climate change often focusses on physical impacts and resilience, I argue that we need to pay due attention to the local turbulence surrounding the discourses of climate change, which exist alongside the physical phenomena.  


Hereditas ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. BECKMAN ◽  
B. CEDERGREN ◽  
M. RASMUSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document