Isolation of the TYE2 gene reveals its identity to SW13 encoding a general transcription factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna L�hning ◽  
Claudia Rosenbaum ◽  
Michael Ciriacy
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
General Transcription Factor

scholarly journals Molecular Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 6000-6013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Sanders ◽  
Krassimira A. Garbett ◽  
P. Anthony Weil
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Molecular Mass ◽  
Molecular Characterization ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Calculated Molecular Mass ◽  
General Transcription Factor

ABSTRACT We previously defined Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID as a 15-subunit complex comprised of the TATA binding protein (TBP) and 14 distinct TBP-associated factors (TAFs). In this report we give a detailed biochemical characterization of this general transcription factor. We have shown that yeast TFIID efficiently mediates both basal and activator-dependent transcription in vitro and displays TATA box binding activity that is functionally distinct from that of TBP. Analyses of the stoichiometry of TFIID subunits indicated that several TAFs are present at more than 1 copy per TFIID complex. This conclusion was further supported by coimmunoprecipitation experiments with a systematic family of (pseudo)diploid yeast strains that expressed epitope-tagged and untagged alleles of the genes encoding TFIID subunits. Based on these data, we calculated a native molecular mass for monomeric TFIID. Purified TFIID behaved in a fashion consistent with this calculated molecular mass in both gel filtration and rate-zonal sedimentation experiments. Quite surprisingly, although the TAF subunits of TFIID cofractionated as a single complex, TBP did not comigrate with the TAFs during either gel filtration chromatography or rate-zonal sedimentation, suggesting that TBP has the ability to dynamically associate with the TFIID TAFs. The results of direct biochemical exchange experiments confirmed this hypothesis. Together, our results represent a concise molecular characterization of the general transcription factor TFIID from S. cerevisiae.

scholarly journals NuA4-Directed Chromatin Transactions throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (15) ◽  
pp. 5327-5335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Durant ◽  
B. Franklin Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferases ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Preinitiation Complex ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Bromodomain Proteins ◽  
Genomic Scale ◽  
H3 Acetylation

ABSTRACT Two of the major histone acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are NuA4 and SAGA, which acetylate histones H4 and H3, respectively. Acetylated H3 and H4 tails have been implicated in binding bromodomain proteins, including Bdf1. Bdf1 interacts with the general transcription factor TFIID, which might promote preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly. Bdf1 also interacts with the SWR complex (SWR-C). SWR-C is responsible for the deposition of the histone H2A variant H2A.Z. The placement of these interactions into a connected pathway of PIC assembly has not been fully established. Moreover, it is not known how widespread and how variable such a pathway might be on a genomic scale. Here we provide genomic evidence for S. cerevisiae that PIC assembly (TFIID occupancy) and chromatin remodeling (SWR-C and H2A.Z occupancy) are linked in large part to NuA4-directed H4 acetylation and subsequent Bdf1 binding, rather than through SAGA-directed H3 acetylation. Bdf1 and its homolog Bdf2 tend to have distinct locations in the genome. However, the deletion of BDF1 leads to the accumulation of Bdf2 at Bdf1-vacated sites. Thus, while Bdf1 and Bdf2 are at least partially redundant in function, their functions in the genome are geographically distinct.

scholarly journals The Karyopherin Kap122p/Pdr6p Imports Both Subunits of the Transcription Factor Iia into the Nucleus

1999 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton A. Titov ◽  
Günter Blobel
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Recombinant Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Cytoplasmic Localization ◽  
Pleiotropic Drug Resistance ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
General Transcription Factor

We discovered a nuclear import pathway mediated by the product of the previously identified Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene PDR6 (pleiotropic drug resistance). This gene product functions as a karyopherin (Kap) for nuclear import. Consistent with previously proposed nomenclature, we have renamed this gene KAP122. Kap122p was localized both to the cytoplasm and the nucleus. As a prominent import substrate of Kap122p, we identified the complex of the large and small subunit (Toa1p and Toa2p, respectively) of the general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA). Recombinant GST-Kap122p formed a complex with recombinant His6-Toa1p/Toa2p. In wild-type cells, Toa1p and Toa2p were localized to the nucleus. Consistent with Kap122p being the principal Kap for import of the Toa1p–Toa2p complex, we found that deletion of KAP122 results in increased cytoplasmic localization of both Toa1p and Toa2p. Deletion of KAP122 is not lethal, although deletion of TOA1 and TOA2 is. Together these data suggest that Kap122p is the major Kap for the import of Toa1p–Toa2p into the nucleus. Like other substrate–Kap complexes, the Toa1p/Toa2p/Kap122p complex isolated from yeast cytosol or reconstituted from recombinant proteins, was dissociated by RanGTP but not RanGDP. Kap122p bound to nucleoporins, specifically, to the peptide repeat–containing fragments of Nup1p and Nup2p.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Activation in Yeast Cells Lacking Transcription Factor IIA

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1573-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Chou ◽  
Sukalyan Chatterjee ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
General Transcription Factor

Abstract The general transcription factor IIA (TFIIA) forms a complex with TFIID at the TATA promoter element, and it inhibits the function of several negative regulators of the TATA-binding protein (TBP) subunit of TFIID. Biochemical experiments suggest that TFIIA is important in the response to transcriptional activators because activation domains can interact with TFIIA, increase recruitment of TFIID and TFIIA to the promoter, and promote isomerization of the TFIID-TFIIA-TATA complex. Here, we describe a double-shut-off approach to deplete yeast cells of Toa1, the large subunit of TFIIA, to <1% of the wild-type level. Interestingly, such TFIIA-depleted cells are essentially unaffected for activation by heat shock factor, Ace1, and Gal4-VP16. However, depletion of TFIIA causes a general two- to threefold decrease of transcription from most yeast promoters and a specific cell-cycle arrest at the G2-M boundary. These results indicate that transcriptional activation in vivo can occur in the absence of TFIIA.

scholarly journals Purification and interaction properties of the human RNA polymerase B(II) general transcription factor BTF2.

1991 ◽  
Vol 266 (31) ◽  
pp. 20940-20945
Author(s):  
M. Gerard ◽  
L. Fischer ◽  
V. Moncollin ◽  
J.M. Chipoulet ◽  
P. Chambon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
General Transcription Factor

scholarly journals Multicopy FZF1 (SUL1) Suppresses the Sulfite Sensitivity but Not the Glucose Derepression or Aberrant Cell Morphology of a grr1 Mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 511-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorina Avram ◽  
Alan T Bakalinsky
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Glucose Metabolism ◽  
Cell Morphology ◽  
Glucose Repression ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Single Copy ◽  
Aberrant Cell ◽  
Growth Defects ◽  
Putative Transcription Factor

Abstract An ssu2 mutation in Sacccharomyces cermisiae, previously shown to cause sulfite sensitivity, was found to be allelic to GRR1, a gene previously implicated in glucose repression. The suppressor rgt1, which suppresses the growth defects of grr1 strains on glucose, did not fully suppress the sensitivity on glucose or nonglucose carbon sources, indicating that it is not strictly linked to a defect in glucose metabolism. Because the Cln1 protein was previously shown to be elevated in grr1 mutants, the effect of CLN1 overexpression on sulfite sensitivity was investigated. Overexpression in GRR1 cells resulted in sulfite sensitivity, suggesting a connection between CLN1 and sulfite metabolism. Multicopy FZF1, a putative transcription factor, was found to suppress the sulfite sensitive phenotype of grr1 strains, but not the glucose derepression or aberrant cell morphology. Multicopy FZF1 was also found to suppress the sensitivity of a number of other unrelated sulfite-sensitive mutants, but not that of ssu1 or met20, implying that FZF1 may act through Ssulp and Met20p. Disruption of FZF1 resulted in sulfite sensitivity when the construct was introduced in single copy at the FZF1 locus in a GRR1 strain, providing evidence that FZF1 is involved in sulfite metabolism.

scholarly journals Differential activation mechanisms of two isoforms of Gcr1 transcription factor generated from spliced and un-spliced transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seungwoo Cha ◽  
Chang Pyo Hong ◽  
Hyun Ah Kang ◽  
Ji-Sook Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Metabolic Switch ◽  
Differential Activation ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Activation Mechanisms ◽  
In Trans ◽  
Separate Activation

Abstract Gcr1, an important transcription factor for glycolytic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was recently revealed to have two isoforms, Gcr1U and Gcr1S, produced from un-spliced and spliced transcripts, respectively. In this study, by generating strains expressing only Gcr1U or Gcr1S using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we elucidate differential activation mechanisms of these two isoforms. The Gcr1U monomer forms an active complex with its coactivator Gcr2 homodimer, whereas Gcr1S acts as a homodimer without Gcr2. The USS domain, 55 residues at the N-terminus existing only in Gcr1U, inhibits dimerization of Gcr1U and even acts in trans to inhibit Gcr1S dimerization. The Gcr1S monomer inhibits the metabolic switch from fermentation to respiration by directly binding to the ALD4 promoter, which can be restored by overexpression of the ALD4 gene, encoding a mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase required for ethanol utilization. Gcr1U and Gcr1S regulate almost the same target genes, but show unique activities depending on growth phase, suggesting that these isoforms play differential roles through separate activation mechanisms depending on environmental conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document