Retardation of cell cycle progression in yeast cells recovering from DNA damage: A study at the single cell level

1987 ◽  
Vol 207 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 320-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Wintersberger ◽  
Anneliese Karwan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Single Cell Level ◽  
Cell Level ◽  
Cycle Progression

Time‐Lapse Microscopy Approaches to Track Cell Cycle Progression at the Single‐Cell Level

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Errington ◽  
Nuria Marquez ◽  
Sally C. Chappell ◽  
Marie Wiltshire ◽  
Paul J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Single Cell Level ◽  
Cell Level ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse Microscopy

scholarly journals PLEK2 Gene Upregulation Might Independently Predict Shorter Progression-Free Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303382095703
Author(s):  
Wenqian Zhang ◽  
Tong Li ◽  
Bin Hu ◽  
Hui Li
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Single Cell Level ◽  
Cell Level ◽  
Free Survival

Objective: This study aimed to explore PLEK2 expression profile, its prognostic value, and the potential genomic alterations associated with its dysregulation in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Materials and methods: Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Kaplan-Meier plotter were used in combination for bioinformatic analysis. Results: PLEK2 mRNA was significantly upregulated in both LUAD and LUSC compared with their respective normal controls. PLEK2 upregulation showed independent prognostic value in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.169, 95%CI: 1.033 -1.322, p = 0.014). PLEK2 mRNA expression was positively correlated with invasion, cell cycle, DNA damage, and DNA repair of LUAD cells at the single-cell level. Genomic analysis showed that gene-level amplification might not directly lead to increased PLEK2 expression. Methylation profile analysis found 4 CpG sites (cg12199376, cg14437634, cg17641252, and cg06724236) had at least a weakly negative correlation with PLEK2 expression, among which cg12199376, cg14437634 and cg17641252 locate around the first exon of the gene. Conclusions: Increased PLEK2 expression might be a specific prognostic biomarker of poor PFS in LUAD patients. Its expression had significant positive correlations with invasion, cell cycle, DNA damage, and DNA repair of LUAD cells at the single-cell level. Promoter hypomethylation might be a potential mechanism leading to its upregulation.

scholarly journals DNA Damage Checkpoints Inhibit Mitotic Exit by Two Different Mechanisms

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 5067-5078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengshan Liang ◽  
Yanchang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Early Anaphase

ABSTRACT Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) governs cell cycle progression, and its kinase activity fluctuates during the cell cycle. Mitotic exit pathways are responsible for the inactivation of CDK after chromosome segregation by promoting the release of a nucleolus-sequestered phosphatase, Cdc14, which antagonizes CDK. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitotic exit is controlled by the FEAR (for “Cdc-fourteen early anaphase release”) and mitotic exit network (MEN) pathways. In response to DNA damage, two branches of the DNA damage checkpoint, Chk1 and Rad53, are activated in budding yeast to prevent anaphase entry and mitotic exit, allowing cells more time to repair damaged DNA. Here we present evidence indicating that yeast cells negatively regulate mitotic exit through two distinct pathways in response to DNA damage. Rad53 prevents mitotic exit by inhibiting the MEN pathway, whereas the Chk1 pathway prevents FEAR pathway-dependent Cdc14 release in the presence of DNA damage. In contrast to previous data, the Rad53 pathway negatively regulates MEN independently of Cdc5, a Polo-like kinase essential for mitotic exit. Instead, a defective Rad53 pathway alleviates the inhibition of MEN by Bfa1.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals STAU2 protein level is controlled by caspases and the CHK1 pathway and regulates cell cycle progression in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Condé ◽  
Yulemi Gonzalez Quesada ◽  
Florence Bonnet-Magnaval ◽  
Rémy Beaujois ◽  
Luc DesGroseillers
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Cycle Progression

AbstractBackgroundStaufen2 (STAU2) is an RNA binding protein involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In neurons, STAU2 is required to maintain the balance between differentiation and proliferation of neural stem cells through asymmetric cell division. However, the importance of controlling STAU2 expression for cell cycle progression is not clear in non-neuronal dividing cells. We recently showed that STAU2 transcription is inhibited in response to DNA-damage due to E2F1 displacement from theSTAU2gene promoter. We now study the regulation of STAU2 steady-state levels in unstressed cells and its consequence for cell proliferation.ResultsCRISPR/Cas9-mediated and RNAi-dependent STAU2 depletion in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells both facilitate cell proliferation suggesting that STAU2 expression influences pathway(s) linked to cell cycle controls. Such effects are not observed in the CRISPR STAU2-KO cancer HCT116 cells nor in the STAU2-RNAi-depleted HeLa cells. Interestingly, a physiological decrease in the steady-state level of STAU2 is controlled by caspases. This effect of peptidases is counterbalanced by the activity of the CHK1 pathway suggesting that STAU2 partial degradation/stabilization fines tune cell cycle progression in unstressed cells. A large-scale proteomic analysis using STAU2/biotinylase fusion protein identifies known STAU2 interactors involved in RNA translation, localization, splicing, or decay confirming the role of STAU2 in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In addition, several proteins found in the nucleolus, including proteins of the ribosome biogenesis pathway and of the DNA damage response, are found in close proximity to STAU2. Strikingly, many of these proteins are linked to the kinase CHK1 pathway, reinforcing the link between STAU2 functions and the CHK1 pathway. Indeed, inhibition of the CHK1 pathway for 4 h dissociates STAU2 from proteins involved in translation and RNA metabolism.ConclusionsThese results indicate that STAU2 is involved in pathway(s) that control(s) cell proliferation, likely via mechanisms of posttranscriptional regulation, ribonucleoprotein complex assembly, genome integrity and/or checkpoint controls. The mechanism by which STAU2 regulates cell growth likely involves caspases and the kinase CHK1 pathway.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 3130-3139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie E Polo ◽  
Abderrahmane Kaidi ◽  
Linda Baskcomb ◽  
Yaron Galanty ◽  
Stephen P Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Responses

scholarly journals Checkpoint Adaptation Precedes Spontaneous and Damage-Induced Genomic Instability in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Galgoczy ◽  
David P. Toczyski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Checkpoint Adaptation ◽  
Block Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Despite the fact that eukaryotic cells enlist checkpoints to block cell cycle progression when their DNA is damaged, cells still undergo frequent genetic rearrangements, both spontaneously and in response to genotoxic agents. We and others have previously characterized a phenomenon (adaptation) in which yeast cells that are arrested at a DNA damage checkpoint eventually override this arrest and reenter the cell cycle, despite the fact that they have not repaired the DNA damage that elicited the arrest. Here, we use mutants that are defective in checkpoint adaptation to show that adaptation is important for achieving the highest possible viability after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, but it also acts as an entrée into some forms of genomic instability. Specifically, the spontaneous and X-ray-induced frequencies of chromosome loss, translocations, and a repair process called break-induced replication occur at significantly reduced rates in adaptation-defective mutants. This indicates that these events occur after a cell has first arrested at the checkpoint and then adapted to that arrest. Because malignant progression frequently involves loss of genes that function in DNA repair, adaptation may promote tumorigenesis by allowing genomic instability to occur in the absence of repair.

scholarly journals Human POLD1 modulates cell cycle progression and DNA damage repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Song ◽  
Ping Hong ◽  
Chengeng Liu ◽  
Yueqi Zhang ◽  
Jinling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Damage Repair

scholarly journals The tail that wags the dog: p12, the smallest subunit of DNA polymerase δ, is degraded by ubiquitin ligases in response to DNA damage and during cell cycle progression

Cell Cycle ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marietta Y.W.T. Lee ◽  
Sufang Zhang ◽  
Szu Hua Lin ◽  
Xiaoxiao Wang ◽  
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Polymerase Δ
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document