Chloroplast DNA diversity within and among populations of Trifolium pratense

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brook G. Milligan
1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuo Mikami ◽  
Yuji Kishima ◽  
Masahiro Sugiura ◽  
Toshiro Kinoshita

2007 ◽  
Vol 243 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Li ◽  
X.J. Ge ◽  
H.L. Cao ◽  
W.H. Ye

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1193-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. FORCIOLI ◽  
P. SAUMITOU-LAPRADE ◽  
M. VALERO ◽  
P. VERNET ◽  
J. CUGUEN

1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick P. Moore

The relationships among raspberry (Rubus spp.) clones were investigated using southern hybridization. Total DNA from 22 clones were digested with Bam III and Eco RI and hybridized with two sequences from a Pst I tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) chloroplast library. A total of 40 different restriction fragments were distinguished for the four enzyme probe combinations. These fragments distinguished seven groups of clones with members of each group having identical fragment patterns. Clones with R. idaeus L. maternal ancestry were distinct from those with R. occident&s L. or R. parvifolius L. ancestry. Differences were detected between R. idaeus vulgatus Arrhen. and R. idaeus strigosus (Michx.). No commercial cultivars had chloroplast DNA patterns that were the same as an accession of the R. idaeus strigosus subspecies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Trewick ◽  
Mary Morgan-Richards ◽  
Hazel M. Chapman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document