Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with depressed left ventricular function: Operative results and long-term follow-up

Surgery Today ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-304
Author(s):  
Satoshi Sekine ◽  
Ryosei Kuribayashi ◽  
Toru Sakurada ◽  
Hiroaki Aida ◽  
Hiroyuki Atsumi ◽  
...  
CHEST Journal ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1593-1597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itzhak Shapira ◽  
Aharon Isakov ◽  
Israel Heller ◽  
Marcel Topilsky ◽  
Amos Pines

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-456.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Iuliana Rufa ◽  
Adrian Ursulescu ◽  
Ragi Nagib ◽  
Selvaraj Shanmuganathan ◽  
Marc Albert ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Agrifoglio ◽  
Fabio Barili ◽  
Alessandro Parolari ◽  
Eleonora Penza ◽  
Matteo Trezzi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shahzad G. Raja ◽  
Umberto Benedetto ◽  
Dimple Chudasama ◽  
Siobhan Daley ◽  
Mubassher Husain ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carlo Bassano ◽  
Paolo Nardi ◽  
Dario Buioni ◽  
Laura Asta ◽  
Calogera Pisano ◽  
...  

Study objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (C-OPCAB) compared with conventional on-pump double clamping coronary artery bypass grafting (C-CABG). Methods: From October 2006 to December 2011, 366 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. After propensity score matching of preoperative variables, 143 pairs were selected who received C-OPCAB with the use of device-assisted PAS-Port proximal venous graft anastomoses or C-CABG, performed by the same surgeon experienced in both techniques. Data of the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed up to 14 years of follow-up. Results: As compared with C-OPCAB, in the C-CABG patients, the performed number of grafts per patient was higher (2.9 ± 0.5 vs. 2.6 ± 0.6, p-value 0.0001). At 14 years, overall survival, including in-hospital death, was 64 ± 4.7% for the C-OPCAB vs. 55 ± 5.5% for the C-CABG, freedom from overall MACCEs 51 ± 6.2% vs. 41 ± 7.7%, and from late cardiac death 94 ± 2.4% vs. 96 ± 2.2% (p-value not significant, for all comparisons). No significant statistical differences were observed in the actual rates of adverse events during follow-up. Independent predictors of survival were advanced age at operation (p-value 0.001) and a lower mean value of preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p-value 0.015). Conclusions: Our single-center study analysis suggests that clampless OPCAB using device-assisted proximal anastomoses proved to be not inferior to double-clamping CABG in the long-term follow-up, provided that involved surgeons are familiar with both techniques. These conclusions are supported by a large and long-term follow-up period, eliminating potential bias, i.e., by means of the propensity score matching and analyzing single-surgeon experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document