The use of 1JC?H? coupling constants as a probe for protein backbone conformation

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
GeertenW. Vuister ◽  
Frank Delaglio ◽  
Ad Bax
PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. e0186215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iyanar Vetrivel ◽  
Swapnil Mahajan ◽  
Manoj Tyagi ◽  
Lionel Hoffmann ◽  
Yves-Henri Sanejouand ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 221 (3) ◽  
pp. 961-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne J. Rooman ◽  
Jean-Pierre A. Kocher ◽  
Shoshana J. Wodak

Amino Acids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1065-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierrick Craveur ◽  
Tarun J. Narwani ◽  
Joseph Rebehmed ◽  
Alexandre G. de Brevern

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel W. Moriarty ◽  
Dale E. Tronrud ◽  
Paul D. Adams ◽  
P. Andrew Karplus

Chemical restraints are a fundamental part of crystallographic protein structure refinement. In response to mounting evidence that conventional restraints have shortcomings, it has previously been documented that using backbone restraints that depend on the protein backbone conformation helps to address these shortcomings and improves the performance of refinements [Moriartyet al.(2014),FEBS J.281, 4061–4071]. It is important that these improvements be made available to all in the protein crystallography community. Toward this end, a change in the default geometry library used byPhenixis described here. Tests are presented showing that this change will not generate increased numbers of outliers during validation, or deposition in the Protein Data Bank, during the transition period in which some validation tools still use the conventional restraint libraries.


1999 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde H. Lerche ◽  
Axel Meissner ◽  
Flemming M. Poulsen ◽  
Ole Winneche Sørensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document