Feeding habits of harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) during early summer and autumn in the northern Barents Sea

Polar Biology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.T. Nilssen ◽  
T. Haug ◽  
V. Potelov ◽  
Y.K. Timoshenko
1991 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 2180-2183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lydersen ◽  
Lars Anker Angantyr ◽  
Øystein Wiig ◽  
Torger Øritsland

Stomachs from 58 harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) from the northern part of the Barents Sea were collected between August 20 and September 5, 1987. Fifty-six of the stomachs contained identifiable remains. The amphipod Parathemisto libellula was the most common food item, found in 98% of the seal stomachs and constituting 57.9% of the total volume. Fish were the second most important prey group, with Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) as the dominant species followed by Nybelin's sculpin (Triglops nybelini) and Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides). Decapods, mainly Pandalus borealis, were also common as prey of harp seals. No sex- or age-related differences in choice of food were found. From knowledge of the depths at locations where seals were collected and the presence of fresh benthic fishes in the seal stomachs, it is assumed that harp seals could forage at depths below 300 m.


2000 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Potelev ◽  
Kjell Tormod Nilssen ◽  
Vladislav Svetochev ◽  
Tore Haug

Diet data were collected in the Greenland Sea pack ice (the West Ice) from March to June from harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) in 1987, 1990-1992 and 1997, and from hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) in 1992 and 1994, during Soviet Russian commercial sealing and on Norwegian scientific expeditions. The majority of both harp and hooded seal stomachs were empty but intestinal contents were found in most of the seals. The harp seal diet was totally dominated by the amphipods Parathemisto sp. and Gammarus sp., but krlll (Thysanoessa sp.) and polar cod (Boreogadus saida) were also eaten quite frequently. Hooded seals had been feeding mainly on the squid Gonatus fabricii, which was found most frequently in the intestines, but which also dominated in the few stomachs with contents. Polar cod also occurred quite frequently in the hooded seal diet, while crustaceans, such as amphipods and krill, occurred only sporadically.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Schmidt ◽  
Geslin Emmanuelle ◽  
Bernhard Joan M. ◽  
LeKieffre Charlotte ◽  
Roberge Helene ◽  
...  

<p>Foraminifera on the seafloor are known to have species-specific feeding habits. Among those are deposit feeders, eating organic detritus and bacteria. Little is known about the feeding habits of foraminifera from Arctic seep environments. That is, in particular, of interest as variable δ<sup>13</sup>C values in the tests of foraminifera have been suggested to be partly linked with a diet rich in bacteria, themselves lighter in δ<sup>13</sup>C values. As there is little information on the ecology of the foraminifer <em>Nonionellina labradorica</em> (Dawson, 1860), this study examined feeding habits on bacteria and compared them to in situ collected specimens, using Transmission Electron microscopy (TEM). As bacterial food, the marine methane-oxidizing bacterium <em>Methyloprofundus sedimenti</em> was chosen, which is an important representative of methanotrophs in the marine environment near methane seeps. Sediment samples containing living N. labradorica specimens collected in close vicinity(approx. 5 m) from an active methane seep in Storfjordrenna, Barents Sea (382-m water depth).  We performed a feeding experiment on <em>N. labradorica </em>(n=17 specimen), which were incubated in the dark at in situ temperature. Specimens were fed at the beginning of the experiment, except the un-fed controls, and incubations terminated after 4, 8 and 20 h. After fixation in epoxy resin the ultrastructure of all specimens and their food vacuoles was observed and compared using a TEM. All examined specimens were living at the time of fixation, based on observation of intact mitochondrial membranes. In all specimens, inorganic detritus was preserved inside food vacuoles. Closer observation of food vacuoles also revealed that in addition to inorganic debris, such as clay, occasionally bacteria were visible. This led us to conclude that our <em>N. labradorica </em>can  generally be classified as a deposit feeder, which is rather a generalist than a specialist. Regarding uptake of <em>M. sedimenti</em>, the timing of the experimentation seemed to be critical. We did not observe methanotrophs preserved in the resin at the 4 and 8 h incubations, but found two putative methanotrophs near the apertural region after the 20-h incubation. After closer observation, we could identify one of those two putative specimen as the menthanothroph <em>M. sedimenti</em> near the foraminiferal aperture, based on presence of a typical type I stacked intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) and storage granules (SC). We concluded that <em>N. labradorica</em> may ingest <em>M. sedimenti</em> via “untargeted grazing” in seeps. Further studies must examine the exact relationship between diet and δ<sup>13</sup>C in foraminiferal test on several different paleo-oceanographically relevant species.</p>


1991 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Haug ◽  
A. B. Kroyer ◽  
K. T. Nilssen ◽  
K. I. Ugland ◽  
P. E. Aspholm

Oryx ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Harry R. Lillie

Around the seas of the far northern Atlantic coming under the influence of Arctic conditions lives, frequently on the wander, one of the most delightful of creatures, the harp seal or saddleback, Phoca groenlandica. Large communities migrate in the Newfoundland, Labrador, Baffin Land, Greenland sector; others through the area of Jan Mayen Island towards Spitzbergen. Gregarious for much of the time, they share their world of ice with the occasional bearded seal and ringed seal, walrus, and polar bear. The White Sea in northern European Russia is a great harp seal nursery, for an eastern community in the area of the Barents Sea.


1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tore Haug ◽  
Kjell Tormod Nilssen ◽  
Nils Øien ◽  
Vladimir Potelov

1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1025-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Bédard

The feeding habits of three plankton-feeding Alcidae, the least, crested, and parakeet auklets were studied on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, between 1964 and 1966. The crested and the least auklets (Aethia cristatella, A. pusilla) exhibit similar patterns of dependence upon the food resources: both have, during early summer, a diversified diet consisting of mysids, hyperiids, gammarids, etc., but restrict themselves largely to one principal prey during the chick-rearing period. Then, A. pusilla eats mostly Calanus sp. while A. cristatella eats Thysanoessa spp. In all years, hatching coincided closely with the appearance of these prey items (copepods and euphausids) in the environment and it is argued that the timing of the auklets' breeding season has been adjusted to their cyclical abundance. Cyclorrhynchus psittacula, the parakeet auklet, maintains a diversified diet throughout the summer: Parathemisto libellula, a pelagic amphipod, is the dominant prey in its diet.The three species are found feeding together and are presumed to use the same depth range. Segregation in feeding between A. cristatella and A. pusilla is achieved by difference in bill size. This difference is sufficient to impose obligatory feeding upon different resources. Segregation between two possible competitors, A. cristatella and Cyclorrhynchus, seems to rest upon innate preferences for different prey types, minor structural differences in the feeding apparatus, and differences in foraging habits: the relative importance of each of these factors remains to be established.As a whole, the amount of overlap in feeding between the three species studied is very small.


2021 ◽  
pp. 531-547
Author(s):  
I.A. Nemirovskaya ◽  
◽  
A.M. Titova ◽  
A.V. Khramtsova ◽  
◽  
...  

Hydrocarbons in water, suspended matter and bottom sediments of the Barents Sea were studied based on materials from expeditions to the RV Akademik Mstislav Keldysh in 2016–2019. It is shown that at present there is no oil pollution in open areas of the Barents Sea. With the transition from early summer (2019) to autumn (2016), there was a decrease in hydrocarbon concentrations in surface waters, caused by a change in the biochemical composition of organic matter (possibly due to a decrease in the area of ice). With depth, the HC content decreased mainly. An exception was observed in the area of gutters and deposits, where in the bottom nepheloid layers there was an increase in the concentration of hydrocarbons in suspension and in the surface layer of bottom sediments, and in the thickness of the sediments there was no dependence on their distribution and organic carbon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document