Preferred direction of movement as an element in the organization of cat visual cortex

1981 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Tolhurst ◽  
A.F. Dean ◽  
I.D. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex ◽  
Direction Of Movement

Are neurons in cat posteromedial lateral suprasylvian visual cortex orientation sensitive? Tests with bars and gratings

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Danilov ◽  
Rodney J. Moore ◽  
Von R. King ◽  
Peter D. Spear
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Orientation Sensitivity ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Response Measures ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Quantitative Response

AbstractThere is controversy in the literature concerning whether or not neurons in the cat's posteromedial lateral suprasylvian (PMLS) visual cortex are orientation selective. Previous studies that have tested cells with simple bar stimuli have found that few, if any, PMLS cells are orientation selective. Conversely, studies that have used repetitive stimuli such as gratings have found that most or all PMLS cells are orientation selective. It is not known whether this difference in results is due to the stimuli used or the laboratories using them. The present experiments were designed to answer this question by testing individual PMLS neurons for orientation sensitivity with both bar and grating stimuli. Using quantitative response measures, we found that most PMLS neurons respond well enough to stationary flashed stimuli to use such stimuli to test for orientation sensitivity. On the basis of these tests, we found that about 85% of the cells with well-defined receptive fields are orientation sensitive to flashed gratings, and a similar percentage are orientation sensitive to flashed bars. About 80% of the cells were orientation sensitive to both types of stimuli. The preferred orientations typically were similar for the two tests, and they were orthogonal to the preferred direction of movement. The strength of the orientation sensitivity (measured as the ratio of discharge to the preferred and nonpreferred orientations) was similar to both types of stimuli. However, the width of the orientation tuning curves was systematically broader to bars than to gratings. Several hypotheses are considered as to why previous studies using bars failed to find evidence for orientation sensitivity. In addition, a mechanism for the difference in orientation tuning to bars and gratings is suggested.

Temporal-frequency tuning of direction selectivity in cat visual cortex

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. Saul ◽  
Allen L. Humphrey
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Half Cycle ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex ◽  
Cortical Responses ◽  
Areas 17 And 18

AbstractResponses of 71 cells in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex were recorded extracellularly while stimulating with gratings drifting in each direction across the receptive field at a series of temporal frequencies. Direction selectivity was most prominent at temporal frequencies of 1–2 Hz. In about 20% of the total population, the response in the nonpreferred direction increased at temporal frequencies of around 4 Hz and direction selectivity was diminished or lost. In a few cells the preferred direction reversed.One consequence of this behavior was a tendency for the preferred direction to have lower optimal temporal frequencies than the nonpreferred direction. Across the population, the preferred direction was tuned almost an octave lower. In spite of this, temporal resolution was similar in the two directions. It appeared that responses in the nonpreferred direction were suppressed at low frequencies, then recovered at higher frequencies.This phenomenon might reflect the convergence in visual cortex of lagged and nonlagged inputs from the lateral geniculate nucleus. These afferents fire about a quarter-cycle apart (i.e. are in temporal quadrature) at low temporal frequencies, but their phase difference increases to a half-cycle by about 4 Hz. Such timing differences could underlie the prevalence of direction-selective cortical responses at 1 and 2 Hz and the loss of direction selectivity in many cells by 4 or 8 Hz.

scholarly journals Prediction of Orientation Selectivity from Receptive Field Architecture in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex

Neuron ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan Lampl ◽  
Jeffrey S. Anderson ◽  
Deda C. Gillespie ◽  
David Ferster
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Orientation Selectivity ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex

Development of Specificity in the Cat Visual Cortex

1975 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Pérez ◽  
Leon Glass ◽  
Robert Shlaer
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex

scholarly journals Synchrony between orientation-selective neurons is modulated during adaptation-induced plasticity in cat visual cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narcis Ghisovan ◽  
Abdellatif Nemri ◽  
Svetlana Shumikhina ◽  
Stephane Molotchnikoff
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Cat Visual Cortex

Receptive-field properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area (MT) of owl monkeys

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Felleman ◽  
J. H. Kaas
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Visual Area ◽  
Area Mt ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Owl Monkeys ◽  
Visual Area Mt

Response properties of single neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of anesthetized owl monkeys were determined and quantified for flashed and moving bars of light under computer control for position, orientation, direction of movement, and speed. Receptive-field sizes, ranging from 4 to 25 degrees in width, were considerably larger than receptive fields with corresponding eccentricities in the striate cortex. Neurons were highly binocular with most cells equally or nearly equally activated by either eye. Neurons varied in selectivity for axis and direction of moving bars. Some neurons demonstrated little or no selectivity, others were bidirectional on a single axis, while the largest group was highly selective for direction with little or no response to bar movement opposite to the preferred direction. Over 70% of neurons were classified as highly selective and 90% showed some preference for direction and/or axis of stimulus movement. Neurons typically responded to bar movement only over a restricted range of velocities. The majority of neurons responded best to a particular velocity within the 5-60 degrees/s range, with marked attenuation of the response for velocities greater or less than the preferred. Some neurons failed to show significant response attenuation even at the lowest tested velocity, while other neurons preferred velocities of 100 degrees/s or more and failed to attenuate to the highest velocities. Response magnitude varied with stimulus dimensions. Increasing the length of the moving bar typically increased the magnitude of the response slightly until the stimulus exceeded the receptive-field borders. Other neurons responded less to increases in bar length within the excitatory receptive field. Neurons preferred narrow bars less than 1 degree in width, and marked reductions in responses characteristically occurred with wider stimuli. Moving patterns of randomly placed small dots were often as effective as or more effective than single bars in activating neurons. Selectivity for direction of movement remained for the dot pattern. for the dot pattern. Poststimulus time (PST) histograms of responses to bars flashed at a series of 21 different positions across the receptive field, in the "response-plane" format, indicated a spatially and temporally homogeneous receptive-field structure for nearly all neurons. Cells characteristically showed transient excitation at both stimulus onset and offset for all effective stimulus locations. Some cells responded mainly at bright stimulus onset or offset.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document