Eye movement related activity and morphology of second order vestibular neurons terminating in the cat abducens nucleus

1980 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. McCrea ◽  
K. Yoshida ◽  
A. Berthoz ◽  
R. Baker
1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2538-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiju Chen-Huang ◽  
Robert A. McCrea

Effects of viewing distance on the responses of vestibular neurons to combined angular and linear vestibular stimulation. The firing behavior of 59 horizontal canal–related secondary vestibular neurons was studied in alert squirrel monkeys during the combined angular and linear vestibuloocular reflex (CVOR). The CVOR was evoked by positioning the animal’s head 20 cm in front of, or behind, the axis of rotation during whole body rotation (0.7, 1.9, and 4.0 Hz). The effect of viewing distance was studied by having the monkeys fixate small targets that were either near (10 cm) or far (1.3–1.7 m) from the eyes. Most units (50/59) were sensitive to eye movements and were monosynaptically activated after electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve (51/56 tested). The responses of eye movement–related units were significantly affected by viewing distance. The viewing distance–related change in response gain of many eye-head-velocity and burst-position units was comparable with the change in eye movement gain. On the other hand, position-vestibular-pause units were approximately half as sensitive to changes in viewing distance as were eye movements. The sensitivity of units to the linear vestibuloocular reflex (LVOR) was estimated by subtraction of angular vestibuloocular reflex (AVOR)–related responses recorded with the head in the center of the axis of rotation from CVOR responses. During far target viewing, unit sensitivity to linear translation was small, but during near target viewing the firing rate of many units was strongly modulated. The LVOR responses and viewing distance–related LVOR responses of most units were nearly in phase with linear head velocity. The signals generated by secondary vestibular units during voluntary cancellation of the AVOR and CVOR were comparable. However, unit sensitivity to linear translation and angular rotation were not well correlated either during far or near target viewing. Unit LVOR responses were also not well correlated with their sensitivity to smooth pursuit eye movements or their sensitivity to viewing distance during the AVOR. On the other hand there was a significant correlation between static eye position sensitivity and sensitivity to viewing distance. We conclude that secondary horizontal canal–related vestibuloocular pathways are an important part of the premotor neural substrate that produces the LVOR. The otolith sensory signals that appear on these pathways have been spatially and temporally transformed to match the angular eye movement commands required to stabilize images at different distances. We suggest that this transformation may be performed by the circuits related to temporal integration of the LVOR.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Straka ◽  
S. Biesdorf ◽  
N. Dieringer

Straka, H., S. Biesdorf, and N. Dieringer. Canal-specific excitation and inhibition of frog second-order vestibular neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 1363–1372, 1997. Second-order vestibular neurons (2°VNs) were identified in the in vitro frog brain by their monosynaptic excitation following electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral VIIIth nerve. Ipsilateral disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were revealed by bath application of the glycine antagonist strychnine or of the γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) antagonist bicuculline. Ipsilateral disynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were analyzed as well. The functional organization of convergent monosynaptic and disynaptic excitatory and inhibitory inputs onto 2°VNs was studied by separate electrical stimulation of individual semicircular canal nerves on the ipsilateral side. Most 2°VNs (88%) received a monosynaptic EPSP exclusively from one of the three semicircular canal nerves; fewer 2°VNs (10%) were monosynaptically excited from two semicircular canal nerves; and even fewer 2°VNs (2%) were monosynaptically excited from each of the three semicircular canal nerves. Disynaptic EPSPs were present in the majority of 2°VNs (68%) and originated from the same (homonymous) semicircular canal nerve that activated a monosynaptic EPSP in a given neuron (22%), from one or both of the other two (heteronymous) canal nerves (18%), or from all three canal nerves (28%). Homonymous activation of disynaptic EPSPs prevailed (74%) among those 2°VNs that exhibited disynaptic EPSPs. Disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) were mediated in 90% of the tested 2°VNs by glycine, in 76% by GABA, and in 62% by GABA as well as by glycine. These IPSPs were activated almost exclusively from the same semicircular canal nerve that evoked the monosynaptic EPSP in a given 2°VN. Our results demonstrate a canal-specific, modular organization of vestibular nerve afferent fiber inputs onto 2°VNs that consists of a monosynaptic excitation from one semicircular canal nerve followed by disynaptic excitatory and inhibitory inputs originating from the homonymous canal nerve. Excitatory and inhibitory second-order (2°) vestibular interneurons are envisaged to form side loops that mediate spatially similar but dynamically different signals to 2° vestibular projection neurons. These feedforward side loops are suited to adjust the dynamic response properties of 2° vestibular projection neurons by facilitating or disfacilitating phasic and tonic input components.


1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 2678-2683 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Cullen ◽  
D. Guitton ◽  
C. G. Rey ◽  
W. Jiang

1. Previous studies in the cat have demonstrated that output neurons of the superior collicular as well as brain stem omnipause neurons have discharges that are best correlated, not with the trajectory of the eye in the head but, with the trajectory of the visual axis in space (gaze = eye-in-head + head-in-space) during rapid orienting coordinated eye and head movements. In this study, we describe the gaze-related activity of cat premotor “inhibitory burst neurons”(IBNs) identified on the basis of their position relative to the abducens nucleus. 2. The firing behavior of IBNs was studied during 1) saccades made with the head stationary, 2) active orienting combined eye-head gaze shifts, and 3) passive movements of the head on the body. IBN discharges were well correlated with the duration and amplitude of saccades made when the head was stationary. In both head-free paradigms, the behavior of cat IBNs differed from that of previously described primate “saccade bursters”. The duration of their burst was better correlated with gaze than saccade duration, and the total number of spikes in a burst was well correlated with gaze amplitude and generally poorly correlated with saccade amplitude. The behavior of cat IBNs also differed from that of previously described primate “gaze bursters”. The slope of the relationship between the total number of spikes and gaze amplitude observed during head-free gaze shifts was significantly lower than that observed during head-fixed saccades. 3. These studies suggest that cat IBNs do not fit into the categories of gaze-bursters or saccade-bursters that have been described in primate studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3501-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Straka ◽  
Stefan Holler ◽  
Fumiyuki Goto ◽  
Florian P. Kolb ◽  
Edwin Gilland

Activation maps of pre- and postsynaptic field potential components evoked by separate electrical stimulation of utricular, lagenar, and saccular nerve branches in the isolated frog hindbrain were recorded within a stereotactic outline of the vestibular nuclei. Utricular and lagenar nerve-evoked activation maps overlapped strongly in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei, whereas lagenar amplitudes were greater in the superior vestibular nucleus. In contrast, the saccular nerve-evoked activation map coincided largely with the dorsal nucleus and the adjacent dorsal part of the lateral vestibular nucleus, corroborating a major auditory and lesser vestibular function of the frog saccule. The stereotactic position of individual second-order otolith neurons matched the distribution of the corresponding otolith nerve-evoked activation maps. Furthermore, particular types of second-order utricular and lagenar neurons were clustered with particular types of second-order canal neurons in a topology that anatomically mirrored the preferred convergence pattern of afferent otolith and canal signals in second-order vestibular neurons. Similarities in the spatial organization of functionally equivalent types of second-order otolith and canal neurons between frog and other vertebrates indicated conservation of a common topographical organization principle. However, the absence of a precise afferent sensory topography combined with the presence of spatially segregated groups of particular second-order vestibular neurons suggests that the vestibular circuitry is organized as a premotor map rather than an organotypical sensory map. Moreover, the conserved segmental location of individual vestibular neuronal phenotypes shows linkage of individual components of vestibulomotor pathways with the underlying genetically specified rhombomeric framework.


1997 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S188
Author(s):  
Sohei Chimoto ◽  
Takahisa Yano ◽  
Yoshiki Iwamoto ◽  
Kaoru Yoshida

1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jai H. Ryu ◽  
Richard W. Babin ◽  
Chan Liu ◽  
Brian F. McCabe

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (9) ◽  
pp. 2509-2523 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Stahl ◽  
Zachary C. Thumser

The mechanics of the eyeball and orbital tissues (the “ocular motor plant”) are a fundamental determinant of ocular motor signal processing. The mouse is used increasingly in ocular motor physiology, but little is known about its plant mechanics. One way to characterize the mechanics is to determine relationships between extraocular motoneuron firing and eye movement. We recorded abducens nucleus neurons in mice executing compensatory eye movements during 0.1- to 1.6-Hz oscillation in the light. We analyzed firing rates to extract eye position and eye velocity sensitivities, from which we determined time constants of a viscoelastic model of the plant. The majority of abducens neurons were already active with the eye in its central rest position, with only 6% recruited at more abducted positions. Firing rates exhibited largely linear relationships to eye movement, although there was a nonlinearity consisting of increasing modulation in proportion to eye movement as eye amplitudes became small (due to reduced stimulus amplitude or reduced alertness). Eye position and velocity sensitivities changed with stimulus frequency as expected for an ocular motor plant dominated by cascaded viscoelasticities. Transfer function poles lay at approximately 0.1 and 0.9 s. Compared with previously studied animal species, the mouse plant is stiffer than the rabbit but laxer than cat and rhesus. Differences between mouse and rabbit can be explained by scaling for eye size (allometry). Differences between the mouse and cat or rhesus can be explained by differing ocular motor repertoires of animals with and without a fovea or area centralis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi R Sato ◽  
Takahide Itokazu ◽  
Hironobu Osaki ◽  
Makoto Ohtake ◽  
Tetsuya Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document