Integration in trigeminal premotor interneurones in the cat

1991 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-G. Westberg ◽  
K.�. Olsson
1989 ◽  
Vol 505 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshinori Hongo ◽  
Shigeru Kitazawa ◽  
Yukari Ohki ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Sasaki ◽  
Ming-Chu Xi

1986 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jellies ◽  
J. L. Larimer

The premotor interneurones that produce coordinated abdominal movements in crayfish (Procambarus) when stimulated directly, are also ‘sensorimotor’. Sets of these interneurones respond in predictable ways to touching the body surface. One set of interneurones (type I) is activated to spiking by touch, while another (type II) receives only subthreshold influences. Several of these interneurones have overlapping receptive fields on the body surface. Touching areas of overlap activates groups of interneurones which discharge at low to moderate frequencies, rather than producing a high-frequency discharge of a single cell. No single positioning interneurone has been identified which is solely responsible for a “voluntary” (spontaneous) motor programme. When active, the positioning interneurones contribute to the production of the behaviour as a member of a constellation of such cells. The results show that this motor system comprises interneurones with sensory as well as motor properties. Although single cells can produce coordinated movements when stimulated at high frequencies, these positioning interneurones appear to function as ‘command elements’ within a large ‘command system’ and not as individual units.


1995 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
K-G. Westberg ◽  
G. Sandstr�m ◽  
K.�. Olsson

2008 ◽  
Vol 586 (2) ◽  
pp. 557-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Stecina ◽  
E. Jankowska ◽  
A. Cabaj ◽  
L.-G. Pettersson ◽  
B. A. Bannatyne ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 141 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-239
Author(s):  
H. REICHERT ◽  
C. H. F. ROWELL

Simultaneous intracellular recordings were made in locusts from (a) flight motor neurones and (b) output interneurones of the flight oscillator. The insects were mounted with the head at the centre of rotation of an artificial horizon. During fictive flight, these animals responded to simulated deviations from course with the changes in motor output appropriate to course-correction manoeuvres, as previously described. In the motor neurone of depressor muscle MN98 (mesothoracic second basalar) these changes take the form of systematic variation in amplitude in the cyclical depolarization seen in the neurone in flight which, in turn, leads to variation in the number of action potentials per cycle (from 0–3) and in the latency of the first spike (up to 19 ms difference). These changes are closely related to the perceived movement of the horizon. The oscillator output, as recorded in metathoracic interneurone 511, shows, in contrast, very little change. The fraction of its variation which is correlated with horizon movement is vanishingly small (e.g. for number of action potentials per burst r2 = 0.008). The exteroceptive sensory inputs which modify motor output during steering do not, therefore, affect the oscillator appreciably. Thus, by exclusion, the motor patterns of compensatory steering are due exclusively to summation of the oscillator drive with the sensory inputs. This takes place in the motor neurones and especially in the premotor interneurones, as previously described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document