Why do female pied flycatchers mate with already mated males: deception or restricted mate sampling?

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tore Slagsvold ◽  
Svein Dale
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 166 (6) ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
Byers ◽  
Wiseman ◽  
Jones ◽  
Roffe
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 166 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Byers ◽  
Patryce A. Wiseman ◽  
Lee Jones ◽  
Thomas J. Roffe
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 179 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Cats Myhre ◽  
Karen de Jong ◽  
Elisabet Forsgren ◽  
Trond Amundsen

1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pekka T. Rintamäki ◽  
Rauno V Alatalo ◽  
Jacob Höglund ◽  
Arne Lundberg

Ethology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 623-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Wikelski ◽  
Chris Carbone ◽  
Peter A. Bednekoff ◽  
Sharmila Choudhury ◽  
Sabine Tebbich

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerlind U. C. Lehmann

Mate choice is a common phenomenon in animals and several factors have been proposed as being involved in the acceptance or rejection of a partner. I investigated the effect of population density on the mate-sampling behaviour of female Xederra charactus (bushcrickets). In my study, female bushcrickets adjusted the tactic of sequential mate sampling in response to mate density, visiting a series of up to five different males per night. Under low-density conditions, females visited fewer males in a night and were less likely to reject a copulation attempt than females under high-density conditions. Rejection of a male occurred during 29% of copulations in areas of high population density, but during only 8% in areas of low population density. Moreover, at low densities, females were less likely to reject mates later in the night, which can be interpreted as a reaction to the time constraints of a finite nightly mating period. Females in high-density populations also more often chose males with a higher mass of the spermatophore-producing accessory glands. Due to such choice, females might receive a larger nuptial gift at mating. These results are consistent with tactical models of search behaviour in which females adjust their behaviour to the number of potential mates and the length of the mating period.


2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1765) ◽  
pp. 20130983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Lindström ◽  
Topi K. Lehtonen
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Gil G. Rosenthal

This chapter focuses on mate sampling and on how choosers decide among sampled mates. The thinking in this regard has largely focused on the fitness consequences for courters and choosers. For courters, how does mate sampling affect choosiness and therefore variance in courter fitness, and how do courters exploit sampling and decision mechanisms? For choosers, how does fitness depend on different putative sampling schemes and decision algorithms? Much of this literature flows back to an influential paper that explored the fitness consequences of several hypothetical sampling schemes. The chapter describes what we know about the heuristic rules that animals use to evaluate finite pools of courters, and about the cognitive constraints underlying mate assessment and comparisons among mates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document