Determining priorities and investment levels in scientific research and development

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. S. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Scientific Research

Scientific research and development Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology – MVA by K. I. Skryabin

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
L. A. Gnezdilova ◽  
◽  
E. A. Tinaeva ◽  
M. V. Selina ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Veterinary Medicine ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Project Financing ◽  
Further Development

The article shows the importance of the grant activities of the teaching staff and young scientists in the development of the Academy. An analysis of project financing at the expense of grants won in 2020 is presented and ways of further development of grant activities are proposed.

Knowledge Transfer for Emerging Work Paradigms

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Sturdivant ◽  
Earl Carnes
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Nuclear Weapons ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Individual Experience ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Collective Experience ◽  
Environmental Legacy

Abstract Department of Energy (DOE) missions include scientific research and development, nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship, and cleanup of the environmental legacy from weapons production. Since the cold war’s end, changes in mission focus have placed considerable attention on the standards for performing work. For activities where risk is understood, the work force’s collective experience is codified in standards. For activities with unconventional risks, good practices and individual experience communicate what is known at the edge of technology and consensus Standards. This paper describes the basis for a Procedures standard, a principles-based enterprise approach for knowledge transfer that supports the unique missions of DOE.

Once again about experts, independent expertise, and expert councils

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
MAXIM SAFONOV ◽  
◽  
MARAT BIKTIMIROV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Technical Expertise ◽  
State Support ◽  
The Status ◽  
Scientific Technical ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article examines the recent active public debate concerning the organization of expert activity in Russia. Along with terminological ambiguity in this area, there are significant issues related to the status of the expert, expert’s independence, and the general devaluation of expert opinion. The activity of expert councils formed under the executive authorities is subject to particular criticism both from the citizens and the state. At the same time, special attention is paid to the participation of the scientific community in the independent expertise of programs, projects, and decisions. In this connection, according to the results of the meeting of the Council on education and science, the list of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation provides for the introduction of amendments into the legislation concerning the concept “scientific (scientific-technical) expertise”. It is necessary to establish the criteria and mechanisms for this expertise, as well as the rules for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of budgetary allocations for state support of scientific research and development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document