Self-reported use of antidepressants or benzodiazepine tranquilizers and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: evidence from two combined case-control studies (Massachusetts, United States)

1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard L. Harlow ◽  
Daniel W. Cramer
2016 ◽  
Vol 184 (8) ◽  
pp. 555-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merlise A. Clyde ◽  
Rachel Palmieri Weber ◽  
Edwin S. Iversen ◽  
Elizabeth M. Poole ◽  
Jennifer A. Doherty ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1025-1042
Author(s):  
Francesmary Modugno ◽  
Zhuxuan Fu ◽  
Susan J. Jordan ◽  
AOCS Group ◽  
Jenny Chang-Claude ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lauren C Peres ◽  
Traci N Bethea ◽  
Tareq F Camacho ◽  
Elisa V Bandera ◽  
Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The causes of racial disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) incidence remain unclear. Differences in the prevalence of ovarian cancer risk factors may explain disparities in EOC incidence among African American (AA) and White women. Methods We used data from four case-control studies and three case-control studies nested within prospective cohorts in the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry Consortium to estimate race-specific associations of ten known or suspected EOC risk factors using logistic regression. Using the Bruzzi method, race-specific population attributable risks (PAR) were estimated for each risk factor individually and collectively, including groupings of exposures (reproductive factors and modifiable factors). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Among 3,244 White EOC cases and 9,638 controls and 1,052 AA EOC cases and 2,410 controls, AA women had a statistically significantly higher PAR (false discovery rate (FDR) P < .001) for first-degree family history of breast cancer (PAR = 10.1%, 95% CI = 6.5% to 13.7%) compared to White women (PAR = 2.6%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 4.4%). After multiple test correction, AA women had a higher PAR than White women when evaluating all risk factors collectively (PAR = 61.6%, 95% CI = 48.6% to 71.3% vs. PAR = 43.0%, 95% CI = 32.8% to 51.4%, respectively; FDR P = .06) and for modifiable exposures, including BMI, oral contraceptives, aspirin, and body powder (PAR = 36.0%, 95% CI = 21.0% to 48.8% vs. PAR = 13.8%, 95% CI = 4.5% to 21.8%, respectively; FDR P = .04). Conclusions Collectively, the selected risk factors accounted for slightly more of the risk among AA than White women, and interventions to reduce EOC incidence that are focused on multiple modifiable risk factors may be slightly more beneficial to AA women than White women at risk for EOC.


1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Negri ◽  
Silvia Franceschi ◽  
Anastasia Tzonou ◽  
Margaret Booth ◽  
Carlo La Vecchia ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Franceschi ◽  
Fabio Parazzini ◽  
Eva Negri ◽  
Margaret Booth ◽  
Carlo La Vecchia ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Hartge ◽  
Mark H. Schiffman ◽  
Robert Hoover ◽  
Larry McGowan ◽  
Linda Lesher ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Præstegaard ◽  
Susanne K. Kjaer ◽  
Thor S.S. Nielsen ◽  
Signe M. Jensen ◽  
Penelope M. Webb ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document