Reproductive effort and phenology of seed production of savanna grasses with different growth form and life history

Vegetatio ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Veenendaal ◽  
W. H. O. Ernst ◽  
G. S. Modise
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Seed Production ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Growth Form

Colonizing ability in the Echinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyard grass). I. Variation in life history

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1844-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spencer C. H. Barrett ◽  
Blake F. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Seed Production ◽  
Life History Traits ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Nutrient Stress ◽  
Reproductive Phenology ◽  
Total Biomass ◽  
Barnyard Grass ◽  
Vegetative Biomass ◽  
Colonizing Ability

A comparison of life history traits in four taxa of the Echinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyard grass) which differ in colonizing ability and weediness was made under various environmental conditions. The taxa were the alien var. crus-galli, a cosmopolitan weed; var. oryzicola, a crop-mimic restricted to rice fields; var. frumentacea, a crop domesticate; and E. muricata, a native of wetland habitats. Populations studied were from the Central Valley of California where the four taxa are sympatric but ecologically differentiated. All comparisons were made under uniform glasshouse conditions to isolate the genetic component of life history variation. Measurements of the patterns of dry weight allocation, time to flowering, reproductive effort, and seed production were made on individuals grown during different periods of the year under "stress" and "nonstress" conditions utilizing randomized multi-harvest designs.Developmental plasticity in allocation patterns and reproductive phenology occurred in all taxa in response to seasonality and nutrient stress although there were significant differences among taxa in the form of the response. Individuals germinating in August yielded less total biomass and allocated a smaller proportion to roots and a larger proportion to secondary tillers and seed than individuals germinating in April. In all taxa, except E. crus-galli var. frumentacea, a delay in flowering under long days resulted in larger vegetative biomass, lower reproductive effort, and where nutrients were limiting, inhibition of secondary tillers. Nutrient stress resulted in a delay in flowering, increased senescence rates, and a reduction in total biomass and reproductive effort. Although each taxon displayed a wide range of tactics, certain differences in life history strategy among the taxa were maintained. In all regimes E. crus-galli var. crus-galli flowered earlier, and exhibited a greater seed production and reproductive effort than var. oryzicola. In general, E. crus-galli var. frumentacea and E. muricata were intermediate in behaviour.Interpopulation variability in the life history traits of E. crus-galli var. crus-galli and E. muricata was measured in a single-harvest, completely randomized design using 10 populations of each taxon. Significant interpopulation variation was recorded within taxa in tiller height and number, aboveground vegetative biomass, time to anthesis, reproductive biomass, harvest index, seed production, and seed weight. Averaged over 10 populations, E. crus-galli var. crus-galli was taller during vegetative growth, flowered more rapidly, allocated a greater proportion of aboveground biomass to reproduction, and produced a greater number of seeds than E. muricata.Variation in life history parameters among barnyard grass taxa may explain differences in colonizing potential. In particular, the failure of E. muricata and E. crus-galli var. oryzicola to colonize open, seasonally moist sites in California where E. crus-galli var. crus-galli flourishes, may be due to their inability to reach reproductive maturity before the onset of summer drought.

Meristem allocation and life-history evolution in herbaceous plants

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Bonser ◽  
Lonnie W. Aarssen
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Apical Dominance ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Life History Evolution ◽  
Meristem Development ◽  
Vegetative Traits ◽  
History Evolution ◽  
Meristem Allocation ◽  
Branching Intensity ◽  
Iteroparous Species

Generalisations of life histories in plants are often framed in terms of allocation to reproduction. For example, relative allocation to reproduction is commonly found to be higher in semelparous than in iteroparous plant species. However, the association between vegetative traits and life history has been largely unexplored. In higher plants, reproductive and vegetative function can be measured in terms of meristem allocation. Under this approach, two vegetative traits (apical dominance (the suppression of axillary meristem development) and branching intensity (the commitment of axillary meristems to branches)) can be measured as well as one reproductive trait (reproductive effort). We used phylogenetically independent contrasts to compare reproductive and vegetative function in annual semelparous and perennial iteroparous species. Twenty congeneric species pairs (each species pair represented by one semelparous and one iteroparous species) across nine families were selected based on availability of herbarium specimens. Semelparous life-history evolution was associated with higher reproductive effort. Conversely, iteroparous life-history evolution was associated with higher apical dominance. Branching intensity was not associated with life history. An evolutionary association between life history and apical dominance but not branching intensity suggests a complex relationship between allocation to vegetative traits and the evolution of plant strategies across environments.

A Primer of Life Histories

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Hutchings
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Life Histories ◽  
Life History Theory ◽  
Life History Traits ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Academic Experience ◽  
Sustainable Exploitation ◽  
Evolution Of Life ◽  
Opportune Time

Life histories describe how genotypes schedule their reproductive effort throughout life in response to factors that affect their survival and fecundity. Life histories are solutions that selection has produced to solve the problem of how to persist in a given environment. These solutions differ tremendously within and among species. Some organisms mature within months of attaining life, others within decades; some produce few, large offspring as opposed to numerous, small offspring; some reproduce many times throughout their lives while others die after reproducing just once. The exponential pace of life-history research provides an opportune time to engage and re-engage new generations of students and researchers on the fundamentals and applications of life-history theory. Chapters 1 through 4 describe the fundamentals of life-history theory. Chapters 5 through 8 focus on the evolution of life-history traits. Chapters 9 and 10 summarize how life-history theory and prediction has been applied within the contexts of conservation and sustainable exploitation. This primer offers an effective means of rendering the topic accessible to readers from a broad range of academic experience and research expertise.

Serotiny and life history of Pinus contorta var. latifolia

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 938-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia S. Muir ◽  
James E. Lotan
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Gene Flow ◽  
Pinus Contorta ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Western Montana ◽  
Tree Age ◽  
Selective Pressures ◽  
Area Growth ◽  
History Of

Mature serotinous and nonserotinous trees of Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm. in the Bitterroot Watershed of western Montana do not differ in most life-history characteristics (reproductive or vegetative). No differences between trees of the two cone types were found in height, basal area, basal area growth rates over the lives of the trees, or crown ratio. Cone number, weights of individual cones and seeds, and estimates of reproductive effort were similar in serotinous and non-serotinous trees. Reproductive characteristics were either independent of tree age, or related similarly in trees of the two cone types. Nonserotinous trees may, however, have more seeds per cone than serotinous trees. This difference in seed numbers may be adaptive if serotinous trees invest relatively heavily in cone materials to protect seeds (which are retained in cones for many years), while nonserotinous trees (which shed seeds each year) invest relatively heavily in seeds. Trees of the two cone types differ mainly in the particular types of disturbance favoring their regeneration, but they often grow in the same stands where there are similar selective pressures on most aspects of their biology. Gene flow between them probably homogenizes all but those differences maintained by strong selective pressures.

Life histories of North American game birds: a reanalysis

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1906-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd W. Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
North American ◽  
Life Histories ◽  
Life History Traits ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Cost Of Reproduction ◽  
Reproductive Value ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Game Birds ◽  
The Cost

Recently, Zammuto (R. M. Zammuto. 1986. Can. J. Zool. 64: 2739–2749) suggested that North American game birds exhibited survival–fecundity trade-offs consistent with the "cost of reproduction" hypothesis. However, there were four serious problems with the data and the analyses that Zammuto used: (i) the species chosen for analysis ("game birds") showed little taxonomic or ecological uniformity, (ii) the measures of future reproductive value (maximum longevity) were severely biased by unequal sample sizes of band recoveries, (iii) the measures of current reproductive effort (clutch sizes) were inappropriate given that most of the birds analyzed produce self-feeding precocial offspring, and (iv) the statistical units used in the majority of analyses (species) were not statistically independent with respect to higher level taxonomy. After correcting these problems, I found little evidence of survival–fecundity trade-offs among precocial game birds, and I attribute most of the explainable variation in life-history traits of these birds to allometry, phylogeny, and geography.

Intraspecific variation in reproductive effort by female Parapediasia teterrella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its relation to body size

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Life History ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Egg Production ◽  
Egg Size ◽  
Reproductive Effort ◽  
Life History Evolution ◽  
Reproductive Parameters ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Egg Number ◽  
Lepidoptera Pyralidae

Daily egg production of the moth Parapediasia teterrella declined over the life-span of the female but egg size remained constant. The absence of water resulted in lower fecundity and early mortality. Egg size and lifetime fecundity showed considerable inter-individual variation and large females produced more and larger eggs than their smaller counterparts. Large females expended greater reproductive effort than small females. Hatching success was negatively related to egg size. In spite of this, large females laying large eggs had higher fitness than small females. I postulate that multiple reproductive strategies within a species, resulting from differences in reproductive effort expended, may explain why expected trade-offs in reproductive parameters (e.g., egg size versus egg number) were not found in this species. Furthermore, I argue that the prevalent interpretation of life-history evolution (that body size is the important determining parameter of life-history parameters) may reflect correlation of body size with reproductive effort, and reproductive effort may be more important in determining the nature of trade-offs between reproductive parameters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document