Microhabitat use by two small benthic stream fish in a 2nd order stream

Hydrobiologia ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 303 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 125-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Zweimüller
Keyword(s):  
Stream Fish ◽  
Microhabitat Use ◽  
Order Stream ◽  
Benthic Stream

Microhabitat use in a stream fish assemblage

1987 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Grossman ◽  
Mary C. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Fish Assemblage ◽  
Stream Fish ◽  
Microhabitat Use

Shape variation in a benthic stream fish across flow regimes

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 738 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Meyers ◽  
Mark C. Belk
Keyword(s):  
Flow Regimes ◽  
Stream Fish ◽  
Shape Variation ◽  
Benthic Stream

Comparison of visual survey and seining methods for estimating abundance of an endangered, benthic stream fish

2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Jordan ◽  
Howard L. Jelks ◽  
Stephen A. Bortone ◽  
Robert M. Dorazio
Keyword(s):  
Stream Fish ◽  
Visual Survey ◽  
Benthic Stream

Friends in Low Places: Responses of a Benthic Stream Fish to Intra-Prey-Guild Alarm Cues

Ethology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 954-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey A. Anderson ◽  
Alicia Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Stream Fish ◽  
Alarm Cues ◽  
Benthic Stream

Morphology and microhabitat use in stream fish

1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 1487-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Wood ◽  
Mark B. Bain
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Fish Species ◽  
Morphological Variation ◽  
Stream Fish ◽  
Microhabitat Use ◽  
Stream Fishes ◽  
Species Comparison ◽  
Body Morphology ◽  
Specialist Species ◽  
Morphological Differences

Microhabitat use and body morphology were compared among 15 warmwater stream fishes from the Alabama River (Alabama, U.S.A.) watershed. Morphological variation among separate populations of a species was detected in 14 of the 15 species, indicating that populations should be separated in analyses among species. Comparison of morphological variation between microhabitat generalist and specialist species suggested that all species may vary in morphology relative to their environment. Regression analysis showed that within two families, Cyprinidae and Percidae, morphology was related to specific microhabitat variables. In the Centrarchidae, morphology was not related to any microhabitat variables. Morphological differences among the species occurred along gradients that were similar to gradients of habitat utilization, indicating that within a family, species widely separated in microhabitat use were morphologically different and species using similar microhabitats were similar in morphology. Our results suggest that patterns of morphological variation correspond to properties of the available habitat for warmwater stream fish species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document