Morphometric variations among larval Anisakis simplex (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) from fishes of the North Atlantic and their use as biological indicators of host stocks

1977 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beverley-Burton ◽  
John H. C. Pippy
1997 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Siles ◽  
C. Cuéllar ◽  
M.J. Perteguer

AbstractRAPD technique was used to differentiate individuals of Anisakis simplex obtained from Merluccius merluccius, Phycis blennoides, Conger conger and Lepidorhombus boscii, from the North Atlantic Ocean. The amplification patterns of the host DNA controls were markedly different from those obtained for the parasitic material. No variation within the same host was detected. The amplification patterns for larvae obtained from fish of the same genus were somewhat different. The amplification patterns of A. simplex isolates from M. merluccius, P. blennoides, C. conger and L. boscii, were different. These results suggest the possible existence of two populations with a considerable high genetic variability and a different adaptation to different host species.


1977 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beverley-Burton ◽  
O. L. Nyman ◽  
John H. C. Pippy

The morphology of larval Anisakis simplex in a subsample taken from Atlantic herring, Clupea harengus harengus, in the North Sea (and used in previous in vitro culture experiments) is described, with particular reference to the excretory system.The morphological similarities of these larvae from C. harengus harengus and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, taken in widely separated locations in the North Atlantic suggests that Anisakis larvae Type 1 is A. simplex. These findings are substantiated by studies on acid phosphatase polymorphism of the larvae and the known geographic ranges of related species. Frequencies of the acid phosphatase phenotypes varied in different sampling areas, suggesting that different populations of larval A. simplex occur in fish in the North Atlantic.


1892 ◽  
Vol 34 (872supp) ◽  
pp. 13940-13941
Author(s):  
Richard Beynon

2019 ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Oleh Poshedin

The purpose of the article is to describe the changes NATO undergoing in response to the challenges of our time. Today NATO, as a key element of European and Euro-Atlantic security, is adapting to changes in the modern security environment by increasing its readiness and ability to respond to any threat. Adaptation measures include the components required to ensure that the Alliance can fully address the security challenges it might face. Responsiveness NATO Response Force enhanced by developing force packages that are able to move rapidly and respond to potential challenges and threats. As part of it, was established a Very High Readiness Joint Task Force, a new Allied joint force that deploy within a few days to respond to challenges that arise, particularly at the periphery of NATO’s territory. NATO emphasizes, that cyber defence is part of NATO’s core task of collective defence. A decision as to when a cyber attack would lead to the invocation of Article 5 would be taken by the North Atlantic Council on a case-by-case basis. Cooperation with NATO already contributes to the implementation of national security and defense in state policy. At the same time, taking into account that all decision-making in NATO based on consensus, Ukraine’s membership in the Alliance quite vague perspective. In such circumstances, in Ukraine you often can hear the idea of announcement of a neutral status. It is worth reminding that non-aligned status did not save Ukraine from Russian aggression. Neutral status will not accomplish it either. All talks about neutrality and the impossibility of Ukraine joining NATO are nothing but manipulations, as well as recognition of the Ukrainian territory as Russian Federation area of influence (this country seeks to sabotage the Euro-Atlantic movement of Ukraine). Think about it, Moldova’s Neutrality is enshrined in the country’s Constitution since 1994. However, this did not help Moldova to restore its territorial integrity and to force Russia to withdraw its troops and armaments from Transnistria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 601 ◽  
pp. 109-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
N McGinty ◽  
AD Barton ◽  
NR Record ◽  
ZV Finkel ◽  
AJ Irwin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document