Transcription Factors Controlling Innate Lymphoid Cell Fate Decisions

2014 ◽  
pp. 215-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph S. N. Klose ◽  
Andreas Diefenbach
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Lymphoid Cell ◽  
Innate Lymphoid Cell ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

scholarly journals Posttranscriptional regulation of T helper cell fate decisions

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (8) ◽  
pp. 2615-2631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai P. Hoefig ◽  
Vigo Heissmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
T Helper Cell ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Helper Cell ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
T Helper ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions

T helper cell subsets orchestrate context- and pathogen-specific responses of the immune system. They mostly do so by secreting specific cytokines that attract or induce activation and differentiation of other immune or nonimmune cells. The differentiation of T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, T follicular helper, Th17, and induced regulatory T cell subsets from naive T cells depends on the activation of intracellular signal transduction cascades. These cascades originate from T cell receptor and costimulatory receptor engagement and also receive critical input from cytokine receptors that sample the cytokine milieu within secondary lymphoid organs. Signal transduction then leads to the expression of subset-specifying transcription factors that, in concert with other transcription factors, up-regulate downstream signature genes. Although regulation of transcription is important, recent research has shown that posttranscriptional and posttranslational regulation can critically shape or even determine the outcome of Th cell differentiation. In this review, we describe how specific microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, and ubiquitin-modifying enzymes regulate their targets to skew cell fate decisions.

Regulation of cell survival and proliferation by the FOXO (Forkhead box, class O) subfamily of Forkhead transcription factors

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 292-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.U. Birkenkamp ◽  
P.J. Coffer
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Acute Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Forkhead Transcription Factors ◽  
Forkhead Box

Recently, the FOXO (Forkhead box, class O) subfamily of Forkhead transcription factors has been identified as direct targets of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-mediated signal transduction. The AFX (acute-lymphocytic-leukaemia-1 fused gene from chromosome X), FKHR (Forkhead in rhabdomyosarcoma) and FKHR-L1 (FKHR-like 1) transcription factors are directly phosphorylated by protein kinase B, resulting in nuclear export and inhibition of transcription. This signalling pathway was first identified in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, where it has a role in regulation of the life span of the organism. Studies have shown that this evolutionarily conserved signalling module has a role in regulation of both cell-cycle progression and cell survival in higher eukaryotes. These effects are co-ordinated by FOXO-mediated induction of a variety of specific target genes that are only now beginning to be identified. Interestingly, FOXO transcription factors appear to be able to regulate transcription through both DNA-binding-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Our understanding of the regulation of FOXO activity, and defining specific transcriptional targets, may provide clues to the molecular mechanisms controlling cell fate decisions to divide, differentiate or die.

scholarly journals Activity of the β-catenin phosphodestruction complex at cell–cell contacts is enhanced by cadherin-based adhesion

2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan T. Maher ◽  
Annette S. Flozak ◽  
Adam M. Stocker ◽  
Anjen Chenn ◽  
Cara J. Gottardi
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Contacts ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
T Cell Factor ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Gsk 3Β ◽  
Canonical Wnt ◽  
Cell Cell

It is well established that cadherin protein levels impact canonical Wnt signaling through binding and sequestering β-catenin (β-cat) from T-cell factor family transcription factors. Whether changes in intercellular adhesion can affect β-cat signaling and the mechanism through which this occurs has remained unresolved. We show that axin, APC2, GSK-3β and N-terminally phosphorylated forms of β-cat can localize to cell–cell contacts in a complex that is molecularly distinct from the cadherin–catenin adhesive complex. Nonetheless, cadherins can promote the N-terminal phosphorylation of β-cat, and cell–cell adhesion increases the turnover of cytosolic β-cat. Together, these data suggest that cadherin-based cell–cell adhesion limits Wnt signals by promoting the activity of a junction-localized β-cat phosphodestruction complex, which may be relevant to tissue morphogenesis and cell fate decisions during development.

Epigenetic regulation in stem cell development, cell fate conversion, and reprogramming

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Ohbo ◽  
Shin-ichi Tomizawa
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Micro Rnas ◽  
Stem Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Fate Conversion

AbstractStem cells are identified classically by an in vivo transplantation assay plus additional characterization, such as marker analysis, linage-tracing and in vitro/ex vivo differentiation assays. Stem cell lines have been derived, in vitro, from adult tissues, the inner cell mass (ICM), epiblast, and male germ stem cells, providing intriguing insight into stem cell biology, plasticity, heterogeneity, metastable state, and the pivotal point at which stem cells irreversibly differentiate to non-stem cells. During the past decade, strategies for manipulating cell fate have revolutionized our understanding about the basic concept of cell differentiation: stem cell lines can be established by introducing transcription factors, as with the case for iPSCs, revealing some of the molecular interplay of key factors during the course of phenotypic changes. In addition to de-differentiation approaches for establishing stem cells, another method has been developed whereby induced expression of certain transcription factors and/or micro RNAs artificially converts differentiated cells from one committed lineage to another; notably, these cells need not transit through a stem/progenitor state. The molecular cues guiding such cell fate conversion and reprogramming remain largely unknown. As differentiation and de-differentiation are directly linked to epigenetic changes, we overview cell fate decisions, and associated gene and epigenetic regulations.

scholarly journals Endogenous fluctuations of OCT4 and SOX2 bias pluripotent cell fate decisions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Strebinger ◽  
Cédric Deluz ◽  
Elias T. Friman ◽  
Subashika Govindan ◽  
Andrea B. Alber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Directed Differentiation ◽  
Es Cell ◽  
Endogenous Fluctuations ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Oct4 Protein

AbstractSOX2 and OCT4 are pioneer transcription factors playing a key role in embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal and differentiation. However, how temporal fluctuations in their expression levels bias lineage commitment is unknown. Here we generated knock-in reporter fusion ES cell lines allowing to monitor endogenous SOX2 and OCT4 protein fluctuations in living cells and to determine their impact on mesendodermal and neuroectodermal commitment. We found that small differences in SOX2 and OCT4 levels impact cell fate commitment in G1 but not in S phase. Elevated SOX2 levels modestly increased neuroectodermal commitment and decreased mesendodermal commitment upon directed differentiation. In contrast, elevated OCT4 levels strongly biased ES cell towards both neuroectodermal and mesendodermal fates. Using ATAC-seq on ES cells gated for different endogenous SOX2 and OCT4 levels, we found that high OCT4 levels increased chromatin accessibility at differentiation-associated enhancers. This suggests that small endogenous fluctuations of pioneer transcription factors can bias cell fate decisions by concentration-dependent priming of differentiation-associated enhancers.

scholarly journals Quantifying the Stability of Coupled Genetic and Epigenetic Switches With Variational Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amogh Sood ◽  
Bin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Histone Modifications ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Variational Principles ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
The Impact

The Waddington landscape provides an intuitive metaphor to view development as a ball rolling down the hill, with distinct phenotypes as basins and differentiation pathways as valleys. Since, at a molecular level, cell differentiation arises from interactions among the genes, a mathematical definition for the Waddington landscape can, in principle, be obtained by studying the gene regulatory networks. For eukaryotes, gene regulation is inextricably and intimately linked to histone modifications. However, the impact of such modifications on both landscape topography and stability of attractor states is not fully understood. In this work, we introduced a minimal kinetic model for gene regulation that combines the impact of both histone modifications and transcription factors. We further developed an approximation scheme based on variational principles to solve the corresponding master equation in a second quantized framework. By analyzing the steady-state solutions at various parameter regimes, we found that histone modification kinetics can significantly alter the behavior of a genetic network, resulting in qualitative changes in gene expression profiles. The emerging epigenetic landscape captures the delicate interplay between transcription factors and histone modifications in driving cell-fate decisions.

scholarly journals The Role of TOX in the Development of Innate Lymphoid Cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey R. Seehus ◽  
Jonathan Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Natural Killer ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Lymphoid Cell ◽  
Adaptive Immune System ◽  
Innate Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Innate Lymphoid Cell

TOX, an evolutionarily conserved member of the HMG-box family of proteins, is essential for the development of various cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system. TOX is required for the development of CD4+T lineage cells in the thymus, including natural killer T and T regulatory cells, as well as development of natural killer cells and fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells, the latter required for lymph node organogenesis. Recently, we have identified a broader role for TOX in the innate immune system, demonstrating that this nuclear protein is required for generation of bone marrow progenitors that have potential to give rise to all innate lymphoid cells. Innate lymphoid cells, classified according to transcription factor expression and cytokine secretion profiles, derive from common lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow and require Notch signals for their development. We discuss here the role of TOX in specifying CLP toward an innate lymphoid cell fate and hypothesize a possible role for TOX in regulating Notch gene targets during innate lymphoid cell development.

scholarly journals Development and differentiation of early innate lymphoid progenitors

2017 ◽  
Vol 215 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Harly ◽  
Maggie Cam ◽  
Jonathan Kaye ◽  
Avinash Bhandoola
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Lymphoid Cell ◽  
Innate Lymphoid Cell ◽  
Adult Bone Marrow ◽  
Lymphoid Progenitors ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Adult Bone

Early innate lymphoid progenitors (EILPs) have recently been identified in mouse adult bone marrow as a multipotential progenitor population specified toward innate lymphoid cell (ILC) lineages, but their relationship with other described ILC progenitors is still unclear. In this study, we examine the progenitor–successor relationships between EILPs, all-lymphoid progenitors (ALPs), and ILC precursors (ILCps). Functional, bioinformatic, phenotypical, and genetic approaches collectively establish EILPs as an intermediate progenitor between ALPs and ILCps. Our work additionally provides new candidate regulators of ILC development and clearly defines the stage of requirement of transcription factors key for early ILC development.

Notch1 inhibits differentiation of hematopoietic cells by sustaining GATA-2 expression

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 3283-3289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiki Kumano ◽  
Shigeru Chiba ◽  
Kiyoshi Shimizu ◽  
Tetsuya Yamagata ◽  
Noriko Hosoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Hematopoietic Cells ◽  
Erythroid Differentiation ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Granulocytic Differentiation ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Delayed Differentiation

Abstract Notch signaling is involved in cell fate decisions in many systems including hematopoiesis. It has been shown that expression of an activated form of Notch1 (aNotch1) in 32D mouse myeloid progenitor cells inhibits the granulocytic differentiation induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Results of the current study show that aNotch1, when expressed in F5-5 mouse erythroleukemia cells, also inhibits erythroid differentiation. Comparison of the expression levels of several transcription factors after stimulation for myeloid and erythroid differentiation, in the presence or absence of aNotch1, revealed that aNotch1 did not change its regulation pattern with any of the transcription factors examined, except for GATA-2, despite its inhibitory effect on differentiation. GATA-2 was down-regulated when the parental 32D and F5-5 were induced to differentiate into granulocytic and erythroid lineages, respectively. In these induction procedures, however, the level of GATA-2 expression was sustained when aNotch1 was expressed. To ascertain whether maintenance of GATA-2 is required for the Notch-induced inhibition of differentiation, the dominant-negative form of GATA-3 (DN-GATA), which acted also against GATA-2, or transcription factor PU.1, which was recently shown to be the repressor of GATA-2, was introduced into aNotch1-expressing 32D (32D/aNotch1) cells that do not express GATA family proteins other than GATA2. Both DN-GATA and PU.1 reversed the phenotype of 32D/aNotch1 inducing its differentiation when G-CSF was added. Furthermore, enforced expression of HES-1, which is involved in Notch signaling, delayed differentiation of 32D, and again this phenotype was neutralized by DN-GATA. These results indicate that GATA-2 activity is necessary for the Notch signaling in hematopoietic cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document