scholarly journals Biasing Allocations of Attention via Selective Weighting of Saliency Signals: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence for the Dimension-Weighting Account

Author(s):  
Heinrich René Liesefeld ◽  
Anna M. Liesefeld ◽  
Stefan Pollmann ◽  
Hermann J. Müller
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (4-8) ◽  
pp. 490-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermann J. Müller ◽  
Joseph Krummenacher
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stefan Pollmann

Abstract. In a series of event-related functional magnetic resonance studies, we consistently found activation in anterior prefrontal cortex related to visual dimension changes in singleton search tasks. I review these data and discuss possible contributions of anterior prefrontal cortex to attention control in visual search. It is proposed that anterior prefrontal cortex may detect task-relevant stimulus changes when the target is ambiguously defined. This process may occur in the absence of awareness and may support visual dimension weighting by inhibition of the old relevant dimension in favor of the new dimension.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takatsune Kumada ◽  
Yuko Hibi

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (4-8) ◽  
pp. 877-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Pollmann ◽  
Ralph Weidner ◽  
Hermann J. Müller ◽  
D. Yves von Cramon

Author(s):  
Katy Varner ◽  
Stephen Dopkins ◽  
Darin Hoyer

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1653-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Töllner ◽  
Klaus Gramann ◽  
Hermann J. Müller ◽  
Martin Eimer

Processing of a given target is facilitated when it is defined within the same (e.g., visual–visual), compared to a different (e.g., tactile–visual), perceptual modality as on the previous trial [Spence, C., Nicholls, M., & Driver, J. The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330–336, 2001]. The present study was designed to identify electrocortical (EEG) correlates underlying this “modality shift effect.” Participants had to discriminate (via foot pedal responses) the modality of the target stimulus, visual versus tactile (Experiment 1), or respond based on the target-defining features (Experiment 2). Thus, modality changes were associated with response changes in Experiment 1, but dissociated in Experiment 2. Both experiments confirmed previous behavioral findings with slower discrimination times for modality change, relative to repetition, trials. Independently of the target-defining modality, spatial stimulus characteristics, and the motor response, this effect was mirrored by enhanced amplitudes of the anterior N1 component. These findings are explained in terms of a generalized “modality-weighting” account, which extends the “dimension-weighting” account proposed by Found and Müller [Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88–101, 1996] for the visual modality. On this account, the anterior N1 enhancement is assumed to reflect the detection of a modality change and initiation of the readjustment of attentional weight-setting from the old to the new target-defining modality in order to optimize target detection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document