Optimizing Management of Heart Failure by Using Echo and Natriuretic Peptides in the Outpatient Unit

Author(s):  
Frank Lloyd Dini ◽  
Gani Bajraktari ◽  
Cornelia Zara ◽  
Nicola Mumoli ◽  
Gian Marco Rosa
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Kenneth McDonald ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
◽  

Heart failure (HF) is characterised by non-specific symptoms and unremarkable physical examination; therefore, the need exists for an available objective marker of HF status. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are a marker that can aid the dilemmas in present-day HF management. More effective screening for clinical deterioration would include changes in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Normal values for BNP, <50–100 pg/ml, have excellent negative predictive value (NPV) in excluding HF as a diagnosis. BNP values that are significantly elevated, e.g. >500 pg/ml, make the diagnosis of HF more likely. There are now established and emerging uses for NPs in managing HF in the community. These include the role of NPs at the time of possible new presentation of HF, its role in prognostication and, finally, the increasing interest in using NPs to guide therapy in the outpatient setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4397
Author(s):  
Michael Lichtenauer ◽  
Peter Jirak ◽  
Vera Paar ◽  
Brigitte Sipos ◽  
Kristen Kopp ◽  
...  

Heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a synergistic effect on cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in patients with established CV disease (CVD). The aim of this review is to summarize the knowledge regarding the discriminative abilities of conventional and novel biomarkers in T2DM patients with established HF or at higher risk of developing HF. While conventional biomarkers, such as natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity troponins demonstrate high predictive ability in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), this is not the case for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF is a heterogeneous disease with a high variability of CVD and conventional risk factors including T2DM, hypertension, renal disease, older age, and female sex; therefore, the extrapolation of predictive abilities of traditional biomarkers on this population is constrained. New biomarker-based approaches are disputed to be sufficient for improving risk stratification and the prediction of poor clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. Novel biomarkers of biomechanical stress, fibrosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and collagen turn-over have shown potential benefits in determining prognosis in T2DM patients with HF regardless of natriuretic peptides, but their role in point-to-care and in routine practice requires elucidation in large clinical trials.


Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Goudot ◽  
Sonia Msadek ◽  
Tanissia Boukertouta ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Schischmanoff ◽  
Christophe Meune

Background: Natriuretic peptides (NPs) have broad indications during heart failure (HF) and the detection of left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk patients. They can also be used for the diagnosis/management of other cardiac diseases. However, very little is known regarding their use in routine practice. Methods: We examined all biological tests performed from February 2010 to August 2015 in two districts from the French Brittany, covering 13,653 km2 and including 22,265 physicians. We report the settings and conditions of N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements (the only locally NP available). Results: From a total of 3,606,432 tests requested in 557,650 adult (older than 20 years) patients, only 56,653 (1.6%) included at least one NT-proBNP measurement. NT-proBNP measurements gradually increased, from 9,188 in 2011 to 12,938 in 2014 (p<0.001). Most NT-proBNP tests were measured in urban laboratories (72.7%) and in private (62.9%) non-hospital/clinics laboratories, they were mostly ordered by general practitioners (66% compared with 11% by cardiologists). The number of NT-proBNP measurements increased with age up to 80-90 years, and 70.3% of tests were measured in ≥75y patients. Creatinine and electrolytes were not associated with NT-proBNP in 15.8% and 19.7% of tests, respectively. Conclusion: Among a very large cohort, we observed that NPs remain largely undermeasured. NT-proBNP is mostly measured in elderly patients, and its interpretation may be hazardous in up to 16% of all individuals because no measurement of creatinine was associated to NT-proBNP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document