Factors that Control Mitotic Spindle Dynamics

2016 ◽  
pp. 89-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Dynamics

scholarly journals Swe1 and Mih1 regulate mitotic spindle dynamics in budding yeast via Bik1

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (17) ◽  
pp. jcs213520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Raspelli ◽  
Silvia Facchinetti ◽  
Roberta Fraschini
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Dynamics

scholarly journals Modeling reveals cortical dynein-dependent oscillations in bipolar spindle length

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayna Mercadante ◽  
Amity Manning ◽  
Sarah Olson
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Force Generation ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Computational Framework ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Force Components ◽  
Over Time

AbstractProper formation and maintenance of the mitotic spindle is required for faithful cell division. While much work has been done to understand the roles of the key force components of the mitotic spindle, identifying the consequences of force perturbations in the spindle remains a challenge. We develop a computational framework accounting for the minimal force requirements of mitotic progression. To reflect early spindle formation, we account for microtubule dynamics and interactions with major force-generating motors, excluding chromosome interactions that dominate later in mitosis. We directly integrate our experimental data to define and validate the model, and then use simulations to analyze individual force components over time and their relationship to spindle dynamics, making it distinct from previously published models. Rather than achieving and maintaining a constant bipolar spindle length, oscillations in pole to pole distance occur that coincide with microtubule binding and force generation by cortical dynein. In the context of high kinesin-14 (HSET) activity, we identify the requirement of high cortical dynein activity for bipolar spindle formation.

A highly conserved centrosomal kinase, AIR-1, is required for accurate cell cycle progression and segregation of developmental factors in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (22) ◽  
pp. 4391-4402 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Schumacher ◽  
N. Ashcroft ◽  
P.J. Donovan ◽  
A. Golden
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Centrosomal Protein ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Developmental Factors ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

S. cerevisiae Ipl1, Drosophila Aurora, and the mammalian centrosomal protein IAK-1 define a new subfamily of serine/threonine kinases that regulate chromosome segregation and mitotic spindle dynamics. Mutations in ipl1 and aurora result in the generation of severely aneuploid cells and, in the case of aurora, monopolar spindles arising from a failure in centrosome separation. Here we show that a related, essential protein from C. elegans, AIR-1 (Aurora/Ipl1 related), is localized to mitotic centrosomes. Disruption of AIR-1 protein expression in C. elegans embryos results in severe aneuploidy and embryonic lethality. Unlike aurora mutants, this aneuploidy does not arise from a failure in centrosome separation. Bipolar spindles are formed in the absence of AIR-1, but they appear to be disorganized and are nucleated by abnormal-looking centrosomes. In addition to its requirement during mitosis, AIR-1 may regulate microtubule-based developmental processes as well. Our data suggests AIR-1 plays a role in P-granule segregation and the association of the germline factor PIE-1 with centrosomes.

scholarly journals HURP controls spindle dynamics to promote proper interkinetochore tension and efficient kinetochore capture

2006 ◽  
Vol 173 (6) ◽  
pp. 879-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Wong ◽  
Guowei Fang
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Specific Mechanism ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Spindle Stability

Through a functional genomic screen for mitotic regulators, we identified hepatoma up-regulated protein (HURP) as a protein that is required for chromosome congression and alignment. In HURP-depleted cells, the persistence of unaligned chromosomes and the reduction of tension across sister kinetochores on aligned chromosomes resulted in the activation of the spindle checkpoint. Although these defects transiently delayed mitotic progression, HeLa cells initiated anaphase without resolution of these deficiencies. This bypass of the checkpoint arrest provides a tumor-specific mechanism for chromosome missegregation and genomic instability. Mechanistically, HURP colocalized with the mitotic spindle in a concentration gradient increasing toward the chromosomes. HURP binds directly to microtubules in vitro and enhances their polymerization. In vivo, HURP stabilizes mitotic microtubules, promotes microtubule polymerization and bipolar spindle formation, and decreases the turnover rate of the mitotic spindle. Thus, HURP controls spindle stability and dynamics to achieve efficient kinetochore capture at prometaphase, timely chromosome congression to the metaphase plate, and proper interkinetochore tension for anaphase initiation.

scholarly journals DDA3 and Mdp3 modulate Kif2a recruitment onto the mitotic spindle to control minus-end spindle dynamics

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (14) ◽  
pp. 2719-2725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Jin Kwon ◽  
Ji Eun Park ◽  
Haiyu Song ◽  
Chang-Young Jang
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Dynamics

scholarly journals Stoichiometric interactions explain spindle dynamics and scaling across 100 million years of nematode evolution

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Farhadifar ◽  
Che-Hang Yu ◽  
Gunar Fabig ◽  
Hai-Yin Wu ◽  
David B Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Genetics ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mechanistic Explanation ◽  
Nematode Species ◽  
Spindle Positioning ◽  
Spindle Dynamics ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Final Length ◽  
Force Generator ◽  
Rule Out

The spindle shows remarkable diversity, and changes in an integrated fashion, as cells vary over evolution. Here, we provide a mechanistic explanation for variations in the first mitotic spindle in nematodes. We used a combination of quantitative genetics and biophysics to rule out broad classes of models of the regulation of spindle length and dynamics, and to establish the importance of a balance of cortical pulling forces acting in different directions. These experiments led us to construct a model of cortical pulling forces in which the stoichiometric interactions of microtubules and force generators (each force generator can bind only one microtubule), is key to explaining the dynamics of spindle positioning and elongation, and spindle final length and scaling with cell size. This model accounts for variations in all the spindle traits we studied here, both within species and across nematode species spanning over 100 million years of evolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document