Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Author(s):  
Fatemeh Saheb Sharif-Askari ◽  
Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman ◽  
Narjes Saheb Sharif-Askari
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M Andreu Cayuelas ◽  
S Raposeiras-Roubin ◽  
E Fortuny Frau ◽  
A Garcia Del Egido ◽  
J Seller-Moya ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, so the decision of antithrombotic therapy is a challenge. Purpose To analyze mortality, embolic and bleeding events in patients with advanced CKD and AF. Methods Multicentric retrospective registry on patients with AF and advanced CKD (CKD-EPI <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). For death, multivariable Cox regression analysis was developed. For embolic and bleeding events, competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray's proportional subhazards model was performed, being death the competing event Results We analysed 405 patients with advanced CKD and newly diagnosed AF. 57 patients were not treated with antithrombotic therapy (14.1%), 80 only with antiplatelet/s (19.8%), 211 only with anticoagulation (52.1%), and 57 with anticoagulant plus antiplatelet/s (14.1%). During a follow-up of 4.6±2.5 years, 205 died (50.6%), 34 had embolic events (8.4%) and 85 had bleeding outcomes (21.0%). Bleeding event rate was significantly lower in patients without antithrombotic therapy (Figure). After multivariate analysis, anticoagulant treatment was associated with higher bleeding rates, without differences in mortality or embolic events (Table). Conclusion Anticoagulation therapy was associated with a significant increase in bleeding events in patients with advanced CKD and newly diagnosed AF. None of the antithrombotic therapy regimens resulted in lower embolic events rate neither benefit in mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by an unconditional grant from BMS-Pfizer


2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (11) ◽  
pp. 2026-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Detlef Albrecht ◽  
Mintu Turakhia ◽  
Daniel Ries ◽  
Thomas Marbury ◽  
William Smith ◽  
...  

AbstractChronic kidney disease (CKD) complicates warfarin anticoagulation partially through its effect on CYP2C9 activity. Tecarfarin, a novel vitamin K antagonist, is not metabolized by CYP2C9. To evaluate the effect of CKD on their metabolism, we measured PK parameters of warfarin and tecarfarin in subjects with and without CKD. CKD subjects with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min not on dialysis (n = 13) were matched to healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 10). Each subject was randomized to either warfarin 10 mg or tecarfarin 30 mg and was later crossed over to the other drug. PK parameters were measured following each drug. Mean plasma concentrations of (S)-warfarin and (R,S)-warfarin were higher (44 and 27%, respectively) in the subjects with CKD than in the healthy subjects. Both of these values fell outside of the 90% confidence interval of equivalence. For tecarfarin, the difference was less than 15% higher. Elimination half-life (t 1/2) increased by 20% for (S)-warfarin and by 8% for (R,S)-warfarin and decreased by 8% for tecarfarin. The mean plasma concentration for tecarfarin's inactive metabolite ATI-5900 increased by approximately eightfold. CKD increased the effect of CYP2C9 genetic variation on (S)-warfarin and (R,S)-warfarin metabolism. Tecarfarin exposure was similar between the HVs and the CKD subjects regardless of CYP2C9 genotype. There were neither serious adverse events (SAEs) nor treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for any subject in the study. CKD inhibits metabolism of (S)-warfarin and (R,S)-warfarin, but not tecarfarin. The safety of repeated dosing of tecarfarin in CKD patients remains unknown. However, if the PK findings of this single-dose study are present with repeated dosing, tecarfarin may lead to dosing that is more predictable than warfarin in CKD patients who require anticoagulation therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Nishimoto ◽  
Y Yamashita ◽  
K Kim ◽  
T Morimoto ◽  
S Saga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) are at a high risk for recurrent VTEs and are recommended to receive prolonged anticoagulation therapy if they are at a low risk for bleeding. However, there are no established risk factors for bleeding during prolonged anticoagulation therapy. Purpose We aimed to identify the risk factors for major bleeding during prolonged anticoagulation therapy in cancer-associated VTE patients. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry is a multicenter retrospective registry enrolling 3027 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTEs among 29 Japanese centers between January 2010 and August 2014. After excluding those without active cancer (N=2332), patients with major bleeding (N=15), death (N=17), and lost to follow-up (N=10) within 10 days after the diagnosis, and those without anticoagulation therapy beyond 10 days after the diagnosis (N=61), the present study population consisted of 592 cancer-associated VTE patients with anticoagulation therapy beyond 10 days after the diagnosis. The outcome measurement was International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy beyond 10 days, which occurred before the first discontinuation of the anticoagulation therapy. We constructed a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the potential risk factors for major bleeding. As a sensitivity analysis, we used Fine and Gray's method to estimate the HR and 95% CI, taking into account the competing risk of all-cause death. Results During a median follow-up period of 199 days, major bleeding occurred in 72 patients (31 patients within 3 months; 41 beyond 3 months). The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 5.8% at 3-months, 13.8% at 1-year, 17.5% at 2-year, and 28.1% at 5-years. The most frequent major bleeding site was gastrointestinal (47%), followed by intracranial (17%) and genitourinary (11%). Major bleeding tended to occur from the sites of the cancer, however, the sites of the cancer and sites of major bleeding were not necessarily concordant. The multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated that terminal cancer (adjusted HR, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.22–7.85, P&lt;0.001), chronic kidney disease (adjusted HR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.06–3.37, P=0.031), and gastrointestinal cancer (adjusted HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.04–3.04, P=0.037) were independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. After taking into account the competing risk of all-cause death, the multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated almost consistent results with the main analysis. Conclusions Major bleeding events were common during prolonged anticoagulation therapy in real-world cancer-associated VTE patients. Terminal cancer, chronic kidney disease, and gastrointestinal cancer were the independent risk factors for major bleeding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Research Institute for Production Development, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 422
Author(s):  
Mihai Ciprian Stoica ◽  
Zsolt Gáll ◽  
Mirela Liana Gliga ◽  
Carmen Denise Căldăraru ◽  
Orsolya Székely

Over the past few decades, a series of innovative medicines have been developed in order to optimize anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). As a result, a number of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) that directly target the enzymatic activity of factor II and factor Xa have been successfully licensed providing a more predictable effect and better safety profile compared to conventional anticoagulants (heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)). However, comparative efficacy and safety data is limited in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (i.e., CKD stage 4/5 and end stage renal disease) because patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were actively excluded from landmark trials, thus representing a major clinical limitation for the currently available agents. However, the renal function of AF patients can be altered over time. On the other hand, patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing AF. This review article will provide an overview of current concepts and recent evidence guiding the clinical use of NOACs in patients with CKD requiring chronic anticoagulation, and the associated risks and benefits of treatment in this specific patient population.


Cor et Vasa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-605
Author(s):  
Terézia Švarcová ◽  
Jiří Veselý

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Fortuny Frau ◽  
S Raposeiras-Roubin ◽  
J.M Andreu-Cayuelas ◽  
A Garcia-Egido ◽  
C Ortiz-Cortes ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, advanced age and chronic kidney disease (CKD) raise the thrombotic and bleeding rates, making the decision of antithrombotic therapy a challenge. Therefore, we conducted an analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy in this population (AF patients ≥80 years) in comparison with younger AF patients (&lt;80 years). Methods For these results we have analyzed data from FIBRA, a multicentric Spanish retrospective registry on patients with CKD-EPI &lt;30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and newly diagnosed NVAF. For death, multivariable Cox regression analysis was developed. For embolic and bleeding events, competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray's proportional subhazards model was performed, being death the competing event Results We analyzed 405 patients with CKD-EPI &lt;30 ml/min/1.73 m2. 232 were ≥80 years-old (57.3%). Median of CHA2DS2-VASC and HASBLED scores were 5 and 3 in patients ≥80 years, respectively, and 3 and 2 in patients &lt;80 years, respectively. The prescription of antithrombotic therapies in elderly versus younger patients is shown in Figure 1. During a follow-up of 4.6±2.5 years, 205 died (50.6%), 34 had embolic events (8.4%) and 85 had bleeding outcomes (21.0%). After multivariate analysis, no benefit of anticoagulation therapy was found for mortality in both, older and younger patients. In patients ≥80, anticoagulation was associated with higher rates of bleeding events without a decrease in embolic outcomes. Conclusion In our registry, anticoagulation has not shown benefit in NVAF patients ≥80 years with glomerular filtrate rate &lt;30 ml/min/1.73 m2, increasing the risk of bleeding events without reducing embolic outcomes. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): BMS-Pfizer alliance unconditional grant


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
MohammadAli Shafiee ◽  
SayyidehForough Hosseini ◽  
Mojgan Mortazavi ◽  
Anahita Emami ◽  
Mahtab Mojtahed Zadeh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Antonio Bellasi ◽  
Marco Valerio Mariani ◽  
Maria Fusaro ◽  
Maura Ravera ◽  
...  

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are strictly related; several independent risk factors of AF are often frequent in CKD patients. AF prevalence is very common among these patients, ranging between 15% and 20% in advanced stages of CKD. Moreover, the results of several studies showed that AF patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher mortality rate than patients with preserved renal function due to an increased incidence of stroke and an unpredicted elevated hemorrhagic risk. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently contraindicated in patients with ESRD and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), remaining the only drugs allowed, although they show numerous critical issues such as a narrow therapeutic window, increased tissue calcification and an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio with low stroke prevention effect and augmented risk of major bleeding. The purpose of this review is to shed light on the applications of DOAC therapy in CKD patients, especially in ESRD patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document