Complications of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Malnutrition and Aspiration Pneumonia

2018 ◽  
pp. 823-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Carrión ◽  
Alicia Costa ◽  
Omar Ortega ◽  
Eric Verin ◽  
Pere Clavé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

scholarly journals Oropharyngeal dysphagia as dominant and life-threatening symptom in dermatomyositis

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 671-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zorana Djakovic ◽  
Sonja Vesic ◽  
Maja Tomovic ◽  
Jelena Vukovic
Keyword(s):  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
Inflammatory Myopathies ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Endoscopic Gastrostomy ◽  
Nutritional Deficit ◽  
Swallowing Pain ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Proximal Myopathy

Background. Dysphagia can be a serious problem in patients with inflammatory myopathies. It may be associated with nutritional deficit, aspiration pneumonia, and poor prognosis. Case report. We presented a 60-year-old male, suffering from difficulty in swallowing, pain and weaknes in the proximal parts of his extremities, and skin manifestation. Laboratory findings showed increased creatine kinase and aldolase. Antinuclear antibodies to HEP-2 subtrate revealed titer of 1:40. Electromyoneurography demonstrated evidence of a proximal myopathy. A muscle biopsy revealed myositis. The baruim swallow test was remarkable for regurgitation, and nasal emerging of barium. Nuclear magnetic resonance images of cranium was normal. Tumor markers CEA, and Ca 19-9 were increased. A dose of 1 mg daily prednisolone was administered and percutaneous enteral feeding was performed. Two months later, the patient developed febrile state, aspiration pneumonia, and died due to respiratory failure. Conclusion. In cases of dermatomyositis with the serious dysphagia, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy should be performed as soon as possible. Owerall survival rate is low, even with an adequate therapy administration. Inflammatory myopathies should be considered in any patient with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

scholarly journals Implementing oral care to reduce aspiration pneumonia amongst patients with dysphagia in a South African setting

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaishika Seedat ◽  
Claire Penn
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Free Water ◽  
Government Hospital ◽  
Thickened Liquids ◽  
Care Protocol ◽  
Water Provision ◽  
Patient Prognosis

Oral care is a crucial routine for patients with dysphagia that, when completed routinely, can prevent the development of aspiration pneumonia. There is no standardised protocol for oral care within government hospitals in South Africa. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of an oral care protocol. Participants were patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, with either stroke or traumatic brain injury as the underlying medical pathology, and nurses. All participants were recruited from one tertiary level government hospital in Gauteng, South Africa. 139 nurses participated in the study and received training on the oral care protocol. There were two groups of participants with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Group one (study group, n = 23) was recruited by consecutive sampling, received regular oral care and were not restricted from drinking water; however, all other liquids were restricted. Group two (comparison group, n = 23) was recruited via a retrospective record review, received inconsistent oral care and were placed on thickened liquids or liquid restricted diets. Results showed that a regimen of regular oral care and free water provision when combined with dysphagia intervention did prevent aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. The article highlights two key findings: that regular and routine oral care is manageable within an acute government hospital context and a strict routine of oral care can reduce aspiration pneumonia in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. An implication from these findings is confirmation that teamwork in acute care settings in developing contexts must be prioritised to improve dysphagia management and patient prognosis.

scholarly journals Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Aspiration Pneumonia Following Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Case Report

Dysphagia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichiro Aoyagi ◽  
Miho Ohashi ◽  
Reisuke Funahashi ◽  
Yohei Otaka ◽  
Eiichi Saitoh
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

scholarly journals Dysphagia Screening for Pneumonia Prevention in a Cancer Hospital: Results of a Quality/Safety Initiative

2019 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-229
Author(s):  
Barbara Ebersole ◽  
Miriam Lango ◽  
John Ridge ◽  
Elizabeth Handorf ◽  
Jeffrey Farma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Cancer Hospital ◽  
Screening Protocol ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
The Impact

Objective Hospital-acquired aspiration pneumonia remains a rare but potentially devastating problem. The best means by which to prevent aspiration in a cancer hospital population has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dysphagia screening on aspiration pneumonia rates in an acute care oncology hospital. Methods A prospective single-institution quality improvement dysphagia screening protocol at a comprehensive cancer center. Effect of dysphagia screening implemented in 2016 on hospital-acquired aspiration pneumonia rates coded “aspiration pneumonitis due to food/vomitus” was compared with rates from 2014 to 2015 prior to implementation. Screening compliance, screening outcomes, patient demographics, and medical data were reviewed as part of a post hoc analysis. Results Of 12,392 admissions in 2014 to 2016, 97 patients developed aspiration pneumonia during their hospitalization. No significant change in aspiration pneumonia rate was seen during the dysphagia screening year when compared to prior years (baseline, 7.36; screening year, 8.78 per 1000 discharges; P = .33). Sixty-eight of the cases (66%) were associated with emesis/gastrointestinal obstruction or perioperative aspiration and only 15 (15%) with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Multivariate analysis found that patients admitted to gastrointestinal surgery had an aspiration risk equivalent to patients admitted to head and neck, thoracic, and pulmonary services (odds ratio, 0.65; P = .2). Discussion Nursing-initiated dysphagia screening did not decrease aspiration pneumonia rates. The causes of aspiration-associated pneumonia were heterogeneous. Aspiration of intestinal contents is a more common source of hospital-acquired pneumonia than oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Swallowing Disorders and Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Howell ◽  
Briana Vamosi
Keyword(s):  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Swallowing Disorders ◽  
Barium Swallow ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Transnasal Esophagoscopy ◽  
Neurologic Disorders ◽  
Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction

A functional swallow involves the neuromuscular coordination of ingestion and digestion of food.  Dysphagia is the term for abnormal swallowing, a discoordination of respiration, phonation, and digestion. Swallowing disorders can describe a simple abnormal sensation of swallow or a complex disorder leading to aspiration pneumonia. The most common cause of mortality and morbidity in dysphagia patients is aspiration pneumonia. Additional complications include malnutrition and dehydration. The prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia is up to 40% in adults over 65 and increases to 60% in institutionalized elderly. Oropharyngeal dysphagia is common after stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and other neurologic disorders. Patients in high-risk groups and patients with signs and symptoms of dysphagia should be diagnosed appropriately to determine underlying cause and aspiration risk. This chapter will focus on dysphagia due to pharyngeal phase disorders and their diagnosis and treatments.  This review contains 6 figures, 4 videos, 5 tables and 49 references. Key Words: dysphagia, swallowing, Zenker diverticulum, modified barium swallow, videofluoroscopic swallowing study, FEES, transnasal esophagoscopy, esophagram 

Complications of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Malnutrition and Aspiration Pneumonia

2011 ◽  
pp. 575-599
Author(s):  
Silvia Carrión ◽  
Eric Verin ◽  
Pere Clavé ◽  
Alessandro Laviano
Keyword(s):  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Lingual Strengthening: Success in an Outpatient Setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Ali Meier
Keyword(s):  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Oral Performance ◽  
Exercise Protocol ◽  
Anterior Position ◽  
Tongue Position ◽  
Bolus Propulsion ◽  
Posterior Position

In the last decade or more, dysphagia research has investigated the effect of lingual strengthening on oropharyngeal dysphagia with promising results. Much of this research has utilized strengthening devices such as the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) or the Madison Oral Strengthening Therapeutic (MOST) Device. Patients are often given a device to use, and are able to complete an exercise protocol daily or multiple times per day. This case study was completed to determine the effectiveness of using the IOPI in an outpatient clinic where therapy was conducted two to three times per week. The patient was seen post tongue resection due to oropharyngeal cancer. From initiation of IOPI use to patient discharge, the patient demonstrated a 71% increase in lingual strength at the anterior position, a 61% increase at the posterior position, and a 314% increase at the base of tongue position. His diet advanced from NPO to general based on gains in lingual strength and bolus propulsion.

Research Consumerism 101: Evaluating External Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
James L. Coyle
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Professional Services ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Professional Judgment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intervention Selection ◽  
Published Research

Abstract The modern clinician is a research consumer. Rehabilitation of oropharyngeal impairments, and prevention of the adverse outcomes of dysphagia, requires the clinician to select interventions for which evidence of a reasonable likelihood of a successful, important outcome exists. The purpose of this paper is to provide strategies for evaluation of published research regarding treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This article utilizes tutorial and examples to inform and educate practitioners in methods of appraising published research. It provides and encourages the use of methods of efficiently evaluating the validity and clinical importance of published research. Additionally, it discusses the importance of the ethical obligation we, as practitioners, have to use evidence-based treatment selection methods and measurement of patient performance during therapy. The reader is provided with tactics for evaluating treatment studies to establish a study's validity and, thereby, objectively select interventions. The importance of avoiding subjective or unsubstantiated claims and using objective methods of generating empirical clinical evidence is emphasized. The ability to evaluate the quality of research provides clinicians with objective intervention selection as an important, essential component of evidence-based clinical practice. ASHA Code of Ethics (2003): Principle I, Rule F: “Individuals shall fully inform the persons they serve of the nature and possible effects of services rendered and products dispensed…” (p. 2) Principle I, Rule G: “Individuals shall evaluate the effectiveness of services rendered and of products dispensed and shall provide services or dispense products only when benefit can reasonably be expected.” (p. 2) Principle IV, Rule G: “Individuals shall not provide professional services without exercising independent professional judgment, regardless of referral source or prescription.” (p. 4)

Hearing and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Young Infants with Parechovirus-A and Enterovirus Meningitis: Cohort Study in Singapore Children and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elis Yuexian Lee ◽  
Jessica Hui Yin Tan ◽  
Chew Thye Choong ◽  
Nancy Wen Sim Tee ◽  
Chia Yin Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Delay ◽  
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Developmental Outcomes ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Cortical Blindness ◽  
Speech Delay ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Young Infants

Abstract Parechovirus-A (PeV-A) and Enterovirus (EV) commonly cause childhood aseptic meningitis. Bacterial meningitis in children has been associated with devastating long-term sequelae. However, developmental outcomes are unclear in Parechovirus meningitis. This study aims to review the clinical findings and developmental outcomes of infants with PeV-A and EV meningitis. We performed a retrospective study of infants aged 90 days or younger being admitted to our hospital with PeV-A meningitis between November 2015 and July 2017, with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PeV-A PCR and negative blood and CSF bacterial cultures. Hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared with a previous cohort of infants aged 90 days or younger with EV meningitis admitted from January 2015 to December 2015. A total of 161 infants were included in our study, of which 68 infants (42.2%) had PeV-A meningitis and 93 infants (57.8%) had EV meningitis. We assessed their developmental outcome at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-meningitis. At 2 years post-meningitis, three infants with PeV-A meningitis had developmental delay (5.5%), whereas none with EV meningitis had developmental delay. One patient had speech delay and autism spectrum disorder, while two had mild speech delay. When compared with our cohort of EV meningitis ≤90 days old, children with PeV-A meningitis ≤90 days old were more likely to have developmental delay 2 years post-meningitis (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 2.0–3.0, p = 0.043). None of the patients with PeV-A or EV meningitis had sensorineural hearing loss or neurological sequelae, such as cortical blindness, oropharyngeal dysphagia, hydrocephalus, epilepsy, or cerebral palsy. Infants with PeV-A meningitis had a significant risk of developmental delay 2 years post-meningitis compared with those with EV meningitis. It is important to follow-up the developmental milestones of infants diagnosed with PeV-A meningitis for at least 2 years; and when they develop developmental delay, to ensure that they receive appropriate intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document