Improvement of the Perfect Recall Rate of Block Splitting Type Morphological Associative Memory Using a Majority Logic Approach

2006 ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Saeki ◽  
Tsutomu Miki
Keyword(s):  
Associative Memory ◽  
Recall Rate ◽  
Perfect Recall ◽  
Majority Logic ◽  
Logic Approach ◽  
Splitting Type

scholarly journals Associative Models for Storing and Retrieving Concept Lattices

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Elena Acevedo ◽  
Cornelio Yáñez-Márquez ◽  
Marco Antonio Acevedo
Keyword(s):  
Associative Memory ◽  
Concept Lattice ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Associative Memories ◽  
Associative Model ◽  
Bidirectional Associative Memory ◽  
Perfect Recall ◽  
Concept Lattices ◽  
Alpha Beta ◽  
Associative Models

Alpha-beta bidirectional associative memories are implemented for storing concept lattices. We use Lindig's algorithm to construct a concept lattice of a particular context; this structure is stored into an associative memory just as a human being does, namely, associating patterns. Bidirectionality and perfect recall of Alpha-Beta associative model make it a great tool to store a concept lattice. In the learning phase, objects and attributes obtained from Lindig's algorithm are associated by Alpha-Beta bidirectional associative memory; in this phase the data is stored. In the recalling phase, the associative model allows to retrieve objects from attributes or vice versa. Our model assures the recalling of every learnt concept.

The “How” of Animacy Effects in Episodic Memory

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bonin ◽  
Margaux Gelin ◽  
Betty Laroche ◽  
Alain Méot ◽  
Aurélia Bugaiska
Keyword(s):  
Memory Load ◽  
Recall Performance ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Human Memory ◽  
Recall Rate ◽  
Interactive Imagery ◽  
Ultimate Explanation ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Observation Results

Abstract. Animates are better remembered than inanimates. According to the adaptive view of human memory ( Nairne, 2010 ; Nairne & Pandeirada, 2010a , 2010b ), this observation results from the fact that animates are more important for survival than inanimates. This ultimate explanation of animacy effects has to be complemented by proximate explanations. Moreover, animacy currently represents an uncontrolled word characteristic in most cognitive research ( VanArsdall, Nairne, Pandeirada, & Cogdill, 2015 ). In four studies, we therefore investigated the “how” of animacy effects. Study 1 revealed that words denoting animates were recalled better than those referring to inanimates in an intentional memory task. Study 2 revealed that adding a concurrent memory load when processing words for the animacy dimension did not impede the animacy effect on recall rates. Study 3A was an exact replication of Study 2 and Study 3B used a higher concurrent memory load. In these two follow-up studies, animacy effects on recall performance were again not altered by a concurrent memory load. Finally, Study 4 showed that using interactive imagery to encode animate and inanimate words did not alter the recall rate of animate words but did increase the recall of inanimate words. Taken together, the findings suggest that imagery processes contribute to these effects.

Associative memory in English-Spanish bilinguals

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Wakeford ◽  
Michael T. Carlin ◽  
Michael P. Toglia
Keyword(s):  
Associative Memory ◽  
Spanish Bilinguals
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document