scholarly journals Improved Sensitivity Estimate for the H 2 Estimation Problem

2006 ◽  
pp. 697-703
Author(s):  
N. D. Christov ◽  
M. Najim ◽  
E. Grivel
Keyword(s):  
Estimation Problem ◽  
Sensitivity Estimate

scholarly journals An Effective Adaptive Combination Strategy for Distributed Learning Network

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5723
Author(s):  
Chundong Xu ◽  
Qinglin Li ◽  
Dongwen Ying
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Variance ◽  
Iteration Scheme ◽  
Estimation Problem ◽  
Lms Algorithm ◽  
Unbiased Estimation ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Least Mean Square ◽  
Combination Strategy ◽  
Adaptive Combination ◽  
Diffusion Networks

In this paper, we develop a modified adaptive combination strategy for the distributed estimation problem over diffusion networks. We still consider the online adaptive combiners estimation problem from the perspective of minimum variance unbiased estimation. In contrast with the classic adaptive combination strategy which exploits orthogonal projection technology, we formulate a non-constrained mean-square deviation (MSD) cost function by introducing Lagrange multipliers. Based on the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions, we derive the fixed-point iteration scheme of adaptive combiners. Illustrative simulations validate the improved transient and steady-state performance of the diffusion least-mean-square LMS algorithm incorporated with the proposed adaptive combination strategy.

scholarly journals Data rate limits for the remote state estimation problem

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 4955-4960
Author(s):  
C. Kawan ◽  
A. Matveev ◽  
A. Pogromsky
Keyword(s):  
State Estimation ◽  
Data Rate ◽  
Estimation Problem ◽  
Remote State Estimation

scholarly journals Technical Note: Comparison of ensemble Kalman filter and variational approaches for CO<sub>2</sub> data assimilation

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 11643-11660 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chatterjee ◽  
A. M. Michalak
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Inverse Modeling ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Co2 Flux ◽  
Estimation Problem ◽  
Square Root ◽  
Flux Estimation ◽  
Source Sink ◽  
Operational Constraints ◽  
Square Root Filter

Abstract. Data assimilation (DA) approaches, including variational and the ensemble Kalman filter methods, provide a computationally efficient framework for solving the CO2 source–sink estimation problem. Unlike DA applications for weather prediction and constituent assimilation, however, the advantages and disadvantages of DA approaches for CO2 flux estimation have not been extensively explored. In this study, we compare and assess estimates from two advanced DA approaches (an ensemble square root filter and a variational technique) using a batch inverse modeling setup as a benchmark, within the context of a simple one-dimensional advection–diffusion prototypical inverse problem that has been designed to capture the nuances of a real CO2 flux estimation problem. Experiments are designed to identify the impact of the observational density, heterogeneity, and uncertainty, as well as operational constraints (i.e., ensemble size, number of descent iterations) on the DA estimates relative to the estimates from a batch inverse modeling scheme. No dynamical model is explicitly specified for the DA approaches to keep the problem setup analogous to a typical real CO2 flux estimation problem. Results demonstrate that the performance of the DA approaches depends on a complex interplay between the measurement network and the operational constraints. Overall, the variational approach (contingent on the availability of an adjoint transport model) more reliably captures the large-scale source–sink patterns. Conversely, the ensemble square root filter provides more realistic uncertainty estimates. Selection of one approach over the other must therefore be guided by the carbon science questions being asked and the operational constraints under which the approaches are being applied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document