Optimizing Relative Weights of Alternatives with Fuzzy Comparative Judgment

2006 ◽  
pp. 649-658
Author(s):  
Chung-Hsing Yeh ◽  
Yu-Hern Chang
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Judgment

Perceptual Quality Assessment of Compressed Vibrotactile Signals through Comparative Judgment

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Evelyn Muschter ◽  
Andreas Noll ◽  
Jinting Zhao ◽  
Rania Hassen ◽  
Matti Strese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Comparative Judgment ◽  
Perceptual Quality

Improving Self-Reflection Assessment Practices: Comparative Judgment as an Alternative to Rubrics

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Liesje Coertjens ◽  
Marije Lesterhuis ◽  
Benedicte Y. De Winter ◽  
Maarten Goossens ◽  
Sven De Maeyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Judgment ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Self Reflection

The Effect of Judgment Context on Assessments of Age Groups

1989 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. Knox ◽  
W.L. Gekoski
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
Semantic Differential ◽  
Age Effect ◽  
Comparative Judgment ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Evaluative Dimension ◽  
Judgment Condition

ABSTRACTIt has been suggested that an exaggeration of the target age effect is obtained when the same respondents judge multiple age groups rather than only one age group. In the present study each of 1200 undergraduates rated a young, middle-aged, or old target on the 32 bipolar adjective pairs of the Aging Semantic Differential (ASD; Rosencranz & McNevin, 1969). An additional 200 undergraduates rated all three target age groups on the ASD. The ASD was scored in terms of the three dimensions reported by its authors. In the isolated judgment condition young targets were rated highest on the Instrumental-Ineffective and Personal Acceptability-Unacceptability dimensions followed, in both cases, by middle-aged and then by old targets; on the Autonomous-Dependent dimension, middle-aged targets were rated higher than both young and old targets. The hypothesized exaggeration of the target age effect in the comparative judgment condition was obtained for the descriptive dimensions (Instrumental-Ineffective and Autonomous-Dependent) but not for the evaluative dimension (Personal Acceptability-Unacceptability) of the ASD. Possible explanations for why judgment context might affect descriptive but not evaluative assessments of target age groups are discussed.

Informing engineering design through adaptive comparative judgment

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg J. Strimel ◽  
Scott R. Bartholomew ◽  
Senay Purzer ◽  
Liwei Zhang ◽  
Emily Yoshikawa Ruesch
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Comparative Judgment ◽  
Adaptive Comparative Judgment

Measuring Discrimination of Complex Musical Events

1977 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren F. Prince
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Judgment ◽  
University Student ◽  
Perceptual Judgment ◽  
Reasonable Accuracy ◽  
Musical Compositions ◽  
Large Complex ◽  
Musical Works ◽  
Reliable Instrument ◽  
Acceptable Reliability ◽  
Reliability Coefficients

This study describes the development of a reliable instrument to measure perceptual judgment in listening to large, complex musical compositions. Paired excerpts from existing compositions in a diversity of historical styles were taped and played to a panel of “expert” listeners. Some pairs were identical, some highly similar, some slightly similar, and some extremely different. The panel's codings were sorted for high and low consensus; the revised instrument was administered to university student samples, producing acceptable reliability coefficients. The study concludes that perception, memory, and comparative judgment in listening to complex musical works can be measured with reasonable accuracy by the instrument.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document