Quantitative Evaluation of Distributed Algorithms Using the Neko Framework: The NekoStat Extension

2005 ◽  
pp. 35-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Falai ◽  
Andrea Bondavalli ◽  
Felicita Di Giandomenico
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Distributed Algorithms

Quantitative evaluation of -ray spectra from scintillation measurements

Physica ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1147-1150
Author(s):  
D MAEDER ◽  
V WINTERSTEIGER
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Evaluation

Qualitative-Quantitative Evaluation of Depressive Symptomatology

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Serra ◽  
Andrea Spoto ◽  
Marta Ghisi ◽  
Giulio Vidotto
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Depressive Symptomatology

Quantitative evaluation of post-bone marrow transplant engraftment status using fluorescent-labeled variable number of tandem repeats

2000 ◽  
Vol 05 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
Robert A. Luhm ◽  
Daniel B. Bellissimo ◽  
Arejas J. Uzgiris ◽  
William R. Drobyski ◽  
Martin J. Hessner
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Marrow Transplant ◽  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Variable Number

Quantitative Evaluation of Myocardial Stress/Rest 201TISPECT: Results of a ROI-Based Method in 108 Patients with CHD

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stirner ◽  
J. Dahl ◽  
R. Uebis ◽  
E. Kleinhans ◽  
M. Biedermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Myocardial Infarctions ◽  
Myocardial Spect ◽  
Luminal Diameter ◽  
Myocardial Stress ◽  
Threshold Criterion ◽  
Combined Evaluation ◽  
Severity Of The Disease

ROI-based polar maps (33 ROIs) were employed to evaluate quantitatively stress/rest myocardial 201TI SPECT in 108 patients with angiographically proven coronary heart disease (CHD) in comparison with 30 controls. Sensitivity in detecting a CHD with stenoses of > 50% of luminal diameter was determined versus normal regional values (± 2.5 SD) employing vitality (VI) and wash-out corrected redistribution (RD). The method was evaluated referring to the severity of the disease, to the number of ROIs displaying changes [(a) 1 ROI, (b) >2 ROIs], to validity of VI, RD or a combination thereof, and for specificity. Wash-out values were found to depend on degree of stress individually achieved and thus were not used as a threshold criterion. Sensitivity in supply areas with old myocardial infarctions was 95% (a) and 86% (b), resp. With no infarction, it was 96% (a) and 79% (b), resp. VI in stenosis > 75% was more sensitive than RD. However, combined evaluation of VI and RD yielded sensitivities from 91-100% (a) and 77-94% (b), resp. for different main supply areas. In stenosis < 50% with normal VI, RD was positive in 18-31 %. Specificity turned out to be 91 % (a) and 97% (b), resp. We conclude that the method presented is reliable to quantify numerically 201TI kinetics in myocardial SPECT, aimed at detecting and describing CHD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document