scholarly journals Motivated Behaviour for Goal Adoption

1998 ◽  
pp. 58-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Luck ◽  
Mark d’Inverno
Keyword(s):  
Goal Adoption

Antecedents and Practices of External Goal Adoption: The Case of Social Ventures and the UN SDGs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 14360
Author(s):  
Nicole Siebold ◽  
Franziska Günzel-Jensen ◽  
Steffen Korsgaard
Keyword(s):  
Social Ventures ◽  
Goal Adoption

scholarly journals Antecedents of Approach-Avoidance Achievement Goal Adoption in Physical Education: A Longitudinal Perspective

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria E. Warburton ◽  
Christopher M. Spray
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Achievement Goals ◽  
Implicit Theories ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
Perceived Competence ◽  
Achievement Goal ◽  
Approach Avoidance ◽  
Goal Adoption ◽  
Mastery Avoidance ◽  
Avoidance Goals

The purpose of this study was to examine the temporal pattern of pupils’ approach-avoidance achievement goal adoption in physical education across Key Stage 3 of secondary school. Moreover, we determined the predictive utility of implicit theories of ability and perceived competence in explaining change in achievement goals, along with the moderating influence of pupils’ year group. On four occasions, over a 9-month period, 511 pupils in Years 7, 8, and 9 completed measures of perceived competence, incremental and entity beliefs, and approach-avoidance goals. Mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, and performance-avoidance goals exhibited a linear decline over time, whereas performance-approach goals showed no significant change. Theoretical propositions regarding the antecedents of approach-avoidance goal adoption were supported. Year group was found to moderate a number of these antecedent-goal relationships. Results suggest that Year 7 is a critical time for adolescents’ motivation in school physical education.

scholarly journals Remarks on Giovanni Sartor's Paper, The Logic of Proportionality: Reasoning with Non-Numerical Magnitudes

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1457-1461
Author(s):  
Wojciech Załuski
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Main Part ◽  
Strict Sense ◽  
Teleological Reasoning ◽  
The Third ◽  
Numerical Magnitudes ◽  
Goal Adoption ◽  
Constituent Elements ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Special Case

In his brilliant paper The Logic of Proportionality: Reasoning with Non-Numerical Magnitudes, Professor Sartor provides a multi-layered analysis of proportionality based on a model of teleological reasoning governed by value-norms, arguing that this kind of reasoning is quantitative but non-numerical, i.e., operates on magnitudes to which no symbolic numerals are assigned. The analysis pursued by Professor Sartor can be divided into three parts. In the first part, drawing on the theory of bounded rationality, Professor Sartor develops a model of teleological reasoning (of which proportionality reasoning is a special case) distinguishing its four stages: Value-adoption, goal-adoption, plan-adoption, and action-adoption. In the second part, he introduces and develops in great and illuminating detail a distinction between value-norms and action-norms. In the third—main—part, Professor Sartor makes the basic claim of his paper that proportionality reasoning (i.e., reasoning aimed at establishing whether a given legislative norm interfering with some constitutionally protected right is “proportional”), involving the assessment of the impact of choices upon relevant values, is quantitative but not based on numerical magnitudes, and develops a conceptual framework for reconstructing this reasoning and explicating its constituent elements (suitability, necessity, and balancing in the strict sense). Each of these parts abounds with valuable analyses and precious insights and would deserve a separate commentary, yet I shall confine myself mainly to the analysis of the third part, in which he develops his basic claim. I shall focus in the first place on two interpretive problems my reading of Professor Sartor's paper has given rise to, though some of my remarks will concern also more technical matters.

The enduring impact of positive affect during explicit goal adoption

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Adams ◽  
Sarah Rodenkirch ◽  
Jordan Ludwig ◽  
Courtney Hittepole ◽  
R. Brian Giesler
Keyword(s):  
Positive Affect ◽  
Goal Adoption

Social comparison information, performance expectancy, and performance goal adoption.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Elliot ◽  
David L. Weissman ◽  
Emily Hangen ◽  
Christopher A. Thorstenson
Keyword(s):  
Social Comparison ◽  
Performance Goal ◽  
Performance Expectancy ◽  
Goal Adoption ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Comparison Information
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document